DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Structural Optimization of a Control Arm with Consideration of Durability Criteria

내구기준을 고려한 컨트롤 암의 구조최적설계

  • Published : 2009.11.01

Abstract

This study suggests a structural design process for the upper control arm installed at a vehicle. Static strength and durability are the most important responses in the structural design of a control arm. This study considers the static strength in the optimization process. The inertia relief method for FE analysis is utilized to simulate the static loading conditions. According to the classification of structural optimization, the structural design of a control arm is included in the category of shape optimization. In this study, the metamodel technique using the kriging method is adopted to obtain the minimum weight satisfying the strength constraint. Then, the final design is suggested by considering the durability criteria. The durability assessment is obtained by the index of fatigue durability called the SWT (Smith-Watson-Topper) index. The final optimum shape has been proposed by trial and error method.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee, K. H. and Kang, D. H., 2007, 'Structural Optimization of an Automotive Door Using the Kriging Interpolation Method,' Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, Vol. 221, No. 12, pp. 1524-1534 https://doi.org/10.1243/09544070JAUTO403
  2. Song, B. C., Park, Y. C., Kang, S. W. and Lee, K. H., 2009, 'Structural Optimization Of An Upper Control Arm, Considering the Strength,' Proceedings IMechE Part D : Journal of Automobile Engineering Vol. 223, pp. 727-735 https://doi.org/10.1243/09544070JAUTO1090
  3. Song, B. S., Park, H. S., Kwon, Y. M., Kim, S. H., Park, Y. C. and Lee, K. H., 2009, ' Structural Design of an Upper Control Arm, Considering Static Strength,' Transaction of KSAE, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp.190-196
  4. Lee, D. C. and Lee, J. I., 2003, 'Structural Optimization Concept for the Design of an Aluminium Control Arm,' Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, Vol. 217, No. 8, pp.647-656 https://doi.org/10.1243/09544070360692041
  5. Kim, M. S., Lee, C. W., Son, S. H., Lim, H. J. and Heo, S. J., 2003, 'Shape Optimization for Improving Fatigue Life of a Lower Control Arm Using the Experimental Design,' Transactions of KSAE, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 161-166
  6. Kim, Y.S., Son, H. S., Park, J. Y., Choi, S. G. and Yang, S. H., 2006, 'Finite Element Analysis to Design and Optimized Forming Conditions for Lower Control Arm,' Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, Vol. 37A, pp. 2539-2547 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02586226
  7. Ahn, P. S., Baeck, S. M., Lee, H. D., Kim, D. U. and Kim, W. J., 2006, 'Development of Aluminum Automotive Control Arm Using Squeeze Casting Process,' Proc. JSAE Annual Congress, Vol. 18-06, pp. 9-12
  8. Sacks, J., Welch, W. J., Mitchell, T. J. and Wynn, H. P., 1989, 'Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments,' Statistical Science, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 409-435 https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177012413
  9. Guinta, A. and Watson., L., 1998, 'A Comparison of Approximation Modeling Techniques: Polynomial versus Interpolating Models,' Proceedings of the 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis, Mo, AIAA, Vol. 2, pp. 392-440
  10. Bessert, N. and Frederich, O., 2005, 'Nonlinear Airship Aeroelasticity,' Journal of Fluids and Structures, Vol. 21, No. 8, pp. 731-742 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2005.09.005
  11. DNDE, 2006, ANSYS WORKBENCH-Simulation Introduction Release 10.0, Busan, Korea
  12. MSC Software Corporation, 2004, MSC.NASTRAN 2004 Design Sensitivity and Optimization User's Guide, Santa Ana, California
  13. VR & D, Inc., 2000, GENESIS Version 6.0 User's Manual, Colorado Springs, Colorado