DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characterization, detection and identification of transgenic chili pepper harboring coat protein gene that enhances resistance to cucumber mosaic virus

  • Seo, Sang-Gyu (Department of Environmental Horticulture, The University of Seoul) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Seong (Department of Environmental Horticulture, The University of Seoul) ;
  • Jeon, Seo-Bum (Department of Environmental Horticulture, The University of Seoul) ;
  • Shin, Mi-Rae (Department of Environmental Horticulture, The University of Seoul) ;
  • Kang, Seung-Won (Department of Applied Plant Science, College of Industrial Science, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Lee, Gung-Pyo (Department of Applied Plant Science, College of Industrial Science, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Hong, Jin-Sung (Plant Virus Bank, Division of Environmental and Life Science, Seoul Women's University) ;
  • Harn, Chee-Hark (Biotechnology Institute, Nongwoo Bio Co., Ltd) ;
  • Ryu, Ki-Hyun (Plant Virus Bank, Division of Environmental and Life Science, Seoul Women's University) ;
  • Park, Tae-Sung (Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Sun-Hyung (Department of Environmental Horticulture, The University of Seoul)
  • Published : 2009.12.31

Abstract

Previously, two events (H15 and B20) of transgenic pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) that enhanced resistance to Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) by the introduction of CMV coat protein (CP) gene were constructed. Presently, a single copy number of the CP gene was revealed in H15 and B20 by Southern blot. To predict possible unintended effects due to transgene insertion in an endogenous gene, we carried out sequencing of the 5'-flanking region of the CP gene and a Blastbased search. The results revealed that insertion of the transgene into genes encoding putative proteins may occur in the H15 and B20 transgenic event. Mutiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for simultaneous detection and identification of transgenic pepper was conducted with a set of nine primers. Both transgenic event were differentiated from non-transgenic event by the presence of 267 bp and 430 bp PCR products indicative of CP gene specific primer pairs and primer pairs targeting the CP gene and 35S promoter. H15 and B20 uniquely possessed a 390 bp and 596 bp PCR product, respectively. The presence of a 1115 bp product corresponding to intrinsic pepper actin gene confirmed the use of pepper DNA as the PCR template. The primer set and PCR conditions used presently may allow the accurate and simple identification of CMV resistant transgenic pepper.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmed FE (2002) Detection of genetically modified organisms in foods. Trends in Biotech 20:215-223 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(01)01920-5
  2. Ezequiel M, Reggiardo, Vallejos RH, Permingeat HR (2006) Detection of BT transgenic maize in foodstuffs. Food Res Inter 39:250-255 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2005.07.013
  3. Germini A, Zanetti A, Salati C, Rossi S, Forreä C, Schmid S, Marchelli R (2004) Development of a seven-target multiplex PCR for the simultaneous detection of transgenic soybean and maize in feeds and foods. J Agric Food Chem 52:3275-3280 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf035052x
  4. Hamill JD, Rounsley S, Spencer A, Todd G, Rhodes MJ (1991) The use of polymerase chain reaction in the plant transformation studies. Plant Cell Rep 10:221-224 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232562
  5. Henegariu O, Heerema NA, Dlouhy SR, Vance GH, Vogt PH (1997) Multiplex PCR: critical parameters and step-by-step protocol. BioTech 23:504-511
  6. James C (2005) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops. ISAAA Briefs NO 34 ISAAA Ithaca NY
  7. James D, Schmidt AM, Wall E, Green M, Masri S (2003) Reliable detection and identification of genetically modified maize, soybean, and canola by multiplex PCR analysis. J Agric Food Chem 51:5829-5834 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0341159
  8. Kim SH, Hamada T (2005) Rapid and reliable method of extracting DNA and RNA from sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. Biotech Lett 27:1841-1845 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-005-3891-2
  9. Krysan PJ, Young JC, Sussman MR (1999) T-DNA as an insertional mutagen in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 11:2283–2290 https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.11.12.2283
  10. Kuiper HA, Kleter GA, Noteborn HPJM, Kok EJ (2001) Assessment of the food safety issues related to genetically modified foods. Plant J 6:503-528 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1994.6040503.x
  11. Lee YH, Jung M, Shin SH, LeeJH, Choi SH, Her NH, Lee JH, Ryu KH, Paek KY, Harn CH (2009) Transgenic peppers that are highly tolerant to a new CMV pathotype. Plant Cell Rep 28:223-232 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-008-0637-3
  12. Mannerli$\ddot{o}$f M, Tenning P (1997) Screening of transgenic plants by multiplex. Plant Mol Biol. Rep. 15: 38-45 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02772111
  13. Matsuoka T, Kuribara H, Akiyama H, Miura H, Goda Y, Kusakabe Y, Isshiki K,Toyoda M, Hino A (2001) A multiplex PCR method of detecting recombinant DNAs from five lines of genetically modified maize. J Food Hyg Soc Jpn 42:24-32 https://doi.org/10.3358/shokueishi.42.24
  14. Yamaguchi H, Sasaki K, Umetsu H, Kamada H (2003) Two detection methods of genetically modified maize and the state of its import into Japan. Food Control 14:201-206 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-7135(02)00062-2

Cited by

  1. Identification of Introduced Gene and Its Expression and Gene Stability Assessment for Event Selection of Genetically Modified Plant toward Approval: Cucumber Mosaic Virus Resistant Hot Pepper vol.30, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7235/hort.2012.12001