Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers A (대한기계학회논문집A)

The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers (대한기계학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Response Surface Approximation for Fatigue Life Prediction and Its Application to Multi-Criteria Optimization With a Priori Preference Information

피로수명예측을 위한 반응표면근사화와 순위선호정보를 가진 다기준최적설계에의 응용

  • 백석흠 (동아대학교 대학원 기계공학과) ;
  • 조석수 (강원대학교 삼척캠퍼스 기계자동차공학부) ;
  • 주원식 (동아대학교 기계공학과)
  • Published : 2009.02.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this paper, a versatile multi-criteria optimization concept for fatigue life prediction is introduced. Multi-criteria decision making in engineering design refers to obtaining a preferred optimal solution in the context of conflicting design objectives. Compromise decision support problems are used to model engineering decisions involving multiple trade-offs. These methods typically rely on a summation of weighted attributes to accomplish trade-offs among competing objectives. This paper gives an interpretation of the decision parameters as governing both the relative importance of the attributes and the degree of compensation between them. The approach utilizes a response surface model, the compromise decision support problem, which is a multi-objective formulation based on goal programming. Examples illustrate the concepts and demonstrate their applicability.

Keywords

References

  1. El-Sayed, M. E. M. and Lund, E. H., 1990, "Structural Optimization with Fatigue Life Constraints," Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 1149-1156 https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(90)90057-N
  2. Kwak, B. M. and Kim, J. H., 2002, "Concept of Allowable Load Set and Its Application for Evaluation of Structural Integrity," Mech. Struct. Mach., Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 213-247 https://doi.org/10.1081/SME-120003017
  3. Yu, Y. G. and Kwak, B. M., 2003 "Development of a CAD-based General Purpose Optimal Design and Its Application to Structural Shape for Fatigue Life," Proceeding of the KSME 2003 Autumn Annual Meeting, Korea (in Korean), pp. 1340-1345
  4. Merkel, M. and Schumacher, A., 2003, "An Automated Optimization Process for a CAE Driven Product Development," ASME J. Mech. Des., Vol. 125, No. 4, pp. 694-700 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1631570
  5. Wang, H., Kim, N. H. and Kim, Y. J., 2006, "Safety Envelope for Load Tolerance and Its Application to Fatigue Reliability Design," ASME J. Mech. Des., Vol. 128, No. 4, pp. 919-927 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2204971
  6. Mrzyglod, M. and Zielinski, A. P., 2007, "Parametric Structural Optimization with Respect to the Multiaxial High-cycle Fatigue Criterion," Struct. Multidisc. Optim., Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 161-171 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-006-0045-7
  7. Matsuishi, M. and Endo, T., 1968, "Fatigue of Metals Subjected to Varying Stress-Fatigue Lives Under Random Loading," Proceedings of the Kyushu District Meeting, JSEM, Fukuoka, Japan, 37-40
  8. Downing, S. D. and Socie, D. F., 1982, "Simplified Rainflow Cycle Counting Algorithms," Int. J. Fatigue, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 31-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-1123(82)90018-4
  9. Fatemi, A. and Yang, L., 1998, "Cumulative Fatigue Damage and Life Prediction Theories: A survey of the state of the art for homogeneous materials," Int. J. Fatigue, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 9-34 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00081-9
  10. Baek, S. H., Lee, K. Y., Mun, S. J., Cho, S. S. and Joo, W. S., 2005, "Fatigue Cumulative Damage and Life Prediction of Uncovered Freight Car Under Service Load using Rainflow Counting Method," Trans. of the KSAE (in Korean), Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 1-9
  11. Baek, S. H., Kim, J. K., Kang, D. H., Kong, H. G., Cho, S. S., Kang, J. H., Park, Y. C. and Joo, W. S., 2007, "Fatigue Damage Approach for Life Prediction of Freight Car Using Rainflow Cycle Counting Method," Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 347, pp. 723-728
  12. Baek, S. H., Cho, S. S. and Joo, W. S., 2008, "Fatigue Life Prediction Based on the Rainflow Cycle Counting Method for Brake End Beam," Int. J. Automotive Technology, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 95-101 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-008-0012-y
  13. Giunta, A. A., Dudley, J. M., Narducci, R., Crossman, B., Haftka, R. T., Mason, W. H. and Watson, L. T., 1994, "Noisy Aerodynamic Response and Smooth Approximations in HSCT Design," Proceedings of the 5th AIAA Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Symposium, Panama City, Florida, Paper No. 94-4376
  14. Van Houten, M. H., Schoofs, A. J. G. and Van Campen, D. H., 1995, "Response Surface Techniques in Structural Optimization," First World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization (WCSMO1), Gosler, Germany, pp. 89-94
  15. Mistree, F., Patel, B. and Vadde, S., 1994, "On Modeling Multiple Objectives and Multi-Level Decisions in Concurrent Design," Advances in Design Automation, pp. 151-162
  16. Gautschi, W., 1996, Orthogonal Polynomials: Applications and Computations, Acta Numerica, Cambrige University Press
  17. Yu, Q, Koizumi, N., Yajima, H. and Shiratori, M., 2001, "Optimum Design of Vehicle Frontal Structure and Occupant Restraint System for Crashworthiness (A Multilevel Approach Using SDSS)", JSME Int. J. Ser A, Solid Mech Mater Eng, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 594-601 https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmea.44.594
  18. Baek, S. H., Hong, S. H., Cho, S. S. and Joo, W. S., 2004, "Multi-objective Optimization in Discrete Design Space using RSM-Based Approximation Method," The Third China-Japan-Korea Joint Symposium on Optimization of Structural and Mechanical Systems (CJK-OSM3), Japan, pp. 125-130
  19. Baek, S. H., Cho, S. S., Kim, H. S. and Joo, W. S., 2006, "Tarde-off Analysis in Multi-objective Optimization Using Chebyshev Orthogonal Polynomials," Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 366-375 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02917519
  20. Yao, W., Xia, K. and Gu, Y., 1995, "On the Fatigue Notch Factor ," Int. J. Fatigue, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 245-251 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-1123(95)93538-D
  21. Norton, R. L., 1999, Machine Design: An Integrated Approach, Prentice Hill, Inc.
  22. Keeney, R. L. and Raifa, H., 1976, Decisions with multiple objective: preferences and value tradeoff, John Wiley and Sons, New York
  23. Steuer, R. E., 1986, Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application, John Wiley & Sons, New York
  24. Stadler, W., 1988, Multicriteria Optimization in Engineering and in the Sciences, Plenum Press, New York
  25. Yu, P. L., 1974, "Cone Convexity, Cone Extreme Points and Nondominated Solutions in Decision Problems With Multiobjectives," J. Optim. Theory Appl., Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 319-377 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00932614
  26. Engau, A. and Wiecek, M. M., 2007, "2D Decision-making for Multicriteria Design Optimization," Struct. Multidisc. Optim., Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 301-315 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-006-0078-y
  27. Hunt, B. J., Blouin, V. Y. and Wiecek, M. M., 2007, "Modeling Relative Importance of Design Criteria With a Modified Pareto Preference," ASME J. Mech. Des., Vol. 129, No. 9, pp. 907-914 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2747634
  28. See, T. K. and Lewis, K., 2006, "A Formal Approach to Handling Conflicts in Multiattribute Group Decision Making," ASME J. Mech. Des., Vol. 128, No. 4, pp. 678-688 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2197836
  29. Mourelatos, Z. P. and Liang, J., 2006, "A Methodology for Trading-Off Performance and Robustness Under Uncertainty," ASME J. Mech. Des., Vol. 128, No. 4, pp. 856-863 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2202883
  30. Besharati, B., Luo, L., Azarm, S. and Kannan, P. K., 2006, "Multi-Objective Single Product Robust Optimization: An Integrated Design and Marketing Approach," ASME J. Mech. Des., Vol. 128, No. 4, pp. 884-892 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2202889
  31. Mistree, F., Hughes, O. F. and Bras, B. A., 1993, "The Compromise Decision Support Problem and the Adaptive Linear Programming Algorithm," Structural Optimization: Status and Promise, Kamat, M. P., ed., AIAA, Washington, D.C., pp. 247–289
  32. Vadde, S., Allen, J. K. and Mistree, F., 1994, "The Bayesian Compromise Decision Support Problem for Multilevel Design Involving Uncertainty," ASME J. Mech. Des., Vol. 116, No. 2, pp. 388-395 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2919391
  33. Chen, W., Allen, J. K., Mistree, F. and Tsui, K. L., 1995, "Integration of Response Surface Methods with the Compromise Decision Support Problem in Developing a General Robust Design Procedure," ASME Design Automation Conference (Azarm, S., et al., ed.), Boston, Massachusetts, ASME, New York, DE-Vol. 82-2, pp. 485-492
  34. Athan, T. W. and Papalambros, P. Y., 1996, "A Note on Weighted Criteria Methods for Compromise Solutions in Multi-objective Optimization, Engineering Optimization, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 155-176 https://doi.org/10.1080/03052159608941404
  35. Chen, W., Wiecek, M. M., Zhang, J., 1999, "Quality Utility-A Compromise Programming Approach to Robust Design," ASME J. Mech. Des., Vol. 121, No. 2, pp. 179-187 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2829440
  36. Hernandez, G., Allen, J. K., Simpson, T. W., Bascaran, E., Avila, L. F. and Salinas, F., 2001, "Robust Design of Families of Products With Production Modeling and Evaluation," ASME J. Mech. Des., Vol. 123, No. 2, pp. 183-190 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1359786
  37. Tappeta, R. V. and Renaud, J. E., 2001, "Interactive Multiobjective Optimization Design Strategy for Decision Based Design," ASME J. Mech. Des., Vol. 123, No. 2, pp. 205-215 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1358302
  38. McAllister, C. D. and Simpson, T. W., 2003, "Multidisciplinary Robust Design Optimization of an Internal Combustion Engine," ASME J. Mech. Des., Vol. 125, No. 1, pp. 124-130 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1543978
  39. Marler, R. T. and Arora, J. S., 2004, "Survey of Multi-objective Optimization Methods for Engineering," Struct. Multidisc. Optim., Vol. 26, No. 6, pp. 369-395 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-003-0368-6
  40. Rolander, N., Rambo, J., Joshi, Y., Allen, J. K. and Mistree, F., 2006, "An Approach to Robust Design of Turbulent Convective Systems," ASME J. Mech. Des., Vol. 128, No. 4, pp. 844-855 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2202882
  41. Park, S. H., 1996, Robust Design and Analysis for Quality Engineering, Chapman & Hall
  42. Peterson, R. E., 1974, Stress Concentration Factors, John Willey & Sons, New York
  43. Murty, A. S. R., Gupta, U. C. and Krishna, R., 1995 "A New Approach to Fatigue Strength Distribution for Fatigue Reliability Evaluation," Int. J. Fatigue, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 85-89 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-1123(95)95886-L
  44. Zheng, X. and Wei, J., 2005 "On the Prediction of P-S-N Curves of 45 Steel Notched Elements and Probability Distribution of Fatigue Life Under Variable Amplitude Loading from Tensile Properties," Int. J. Fatigue, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 601-609 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.01.001
  45. Baek, S. H., Jeon, J. H., Lee, K. Y., Cho, S. S. and Joo, W. S., 2005, "Reliability Analysis and Preventive Maintenance for Fatigue Life of End Beam for Uncovered Freight Car," Trans. of the KSME (A) (in Korean), Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 495-502 https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-A.2005.29.3.495
  46. ANSYS, 2004, Release 9.0 Documentation, SAS IP, Inc.
  47. Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) E4207, 1984, Truck Frames for Railway Rolling Stock-General Rules for Design, Japanese Standards Association
  48. Baek, S. H., Lee, K. Y., Cho, S. S. and Joo, W. S., 2007, "Reliability-based Optimization for Fatigue Maintenance Planning of Freight Car," 10th International Conference on the Mechanical Behavior of Materials, The Mechanical Behavior of Materials X: Session 14, Korea, pp. 1369-1372
  49. Du, X., Sudjianto, A. and Chen, W., 2004, "An Integrated Framework for Optimization Under Uncertainty Using Inverse Reliability Strategy," ASME J. Mech. Des., Vol. 126, No. 4, pp. 562-570 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1759358
  50. Mourelatos, Z. P. and Liang, J., 2006, "A Methodology for Trading-Off Performance and Robustness Under Uncertainty," ASME J. Mech. Des., Vol. 128, No. 4, pp. 856-863 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2202883
  51. Song, J. D. and Yang, B. S., 2006, "Development of Pareto Artificial Life Optimization Algorithm," Trans. of the KSME (A) (in Korean), Vol. 30, No. 11, pp. 1358-1368 https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-A.2006.30.11.1358
  52. Acar, E., Haftka, R. T. and Johnson, T. F., 2007, "Tradeoff of Uncertainty Reduction Mechanisms for Reducing Weight of Composite Laminates," ASME J. Mech. Des., Vol. 129, No. 3, pp. 266-274 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2406097
  53. Pareto V, 1896, Cours d'Economise Politique, Rouge, Lausanne, Switzerland
  54. Kasprzak, E. M. and Lewis, K. E. 2001, "Pareto Analysis in Multiobjective Optimization using the Collinearity Theorem and Scaling Method," Struct. Multidisc. Optim., Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 208-211 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001580100138
  55. Shan, S. and Wang, G. G., 2005, "An Efficient Pareto Set Identification Approach for Multiobjective Optimization on Black-Box Functions," ASME J. Mech. Des., Vol. 127, No. 5, pp. 866-874 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1904639
  56. Shimizu, E., Isogai, K. and Obayashi, S., 2008, "Multiobjective Design Study of a Flapping Wing Power Generator," ASME J. Fluids Eng., Vol. 130, No. 2, pp. 021104-1-8 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2829580
  57. Farhang-Mehr, A. and Azarm, S., 2003, "An Information-Theoretic Entropy Metric for Assessing Multi-Objective Optimization Solution Set Quality," ASME J. Mech. Des., Vol. 125, No. 4, pp. 655-663 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1623186
  58. Jensen, H. A. and Sepulveda, A. E., 1998, "A Preference Aggregation Rule Approach for Structural Optimization," Struct. Multidisc. Optim., Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 246-257 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01271431

Cited by

  1. Multiobjective optimization strategy based on kriging metamodel and its application to design of axial piston pumps vol.37, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5916/jkosme.2013.37.8.893
  2. A Sequential Optimization Algorithm Using Metamodel-Based Multilevel Analysis vol.33, pp.9, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-A.2009.33.9.892
  3. TOPSIS-Based Multi-Objective Shape Optimization for a CRT Funnel vol.35, pp.7, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-A.2011.35.7.729
  4. Structural Optimization of Variable Swash Plate for Automotive Compressor Using Orthogonal Polynomials vol.35, pp.10, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-A.2011.35.10.1273
  5. Optimization Techniques for the Inverse Analysis of Service Boundary Conditions in a Porous Catalyst Substrate with Fluid-Structure Interaction Problems vol.35, pp.10, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-A.2011.35.10.1161
  6. Shape Optimization of Impeller Blades for Bidirectional Axial Flow Pump vol.36, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-B.2012.36.12.1141