Korean Public Administration Review (한국행정학보)

The Korean Association for Public Administration (한국행정학회)
권호 표지

Coauthorship Patterns in Korean Public Administrative Review(1989-2008)

학술논문 공동저술 유형 분석: 한국행정학보(1989-2008) 기고논문을 중심으로

Choi, Young-Hoon;Lee, Kang-Choon
최영훈;이강춘

  • Published : 20090900
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

본 연구는 학술논문의 공동저술 증가현상 속에서 공동저술에 대한 ‘합리적인’ 관점이 아닌 사회적 관점에서 공동저술활동에 내재되어 있는 사회적 관계성을 파악하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 본 연구는 한국행정학분야의 대표적 학술지인 한국행정학보에 1989년 제23권 제1호부터 2008년 42권4호까지 20년간에 걸쳐 게재된 논문으로서 저자가 2인 이상인 공동저술 논문 중 일반 연구논문 294편을 대상으로 분석하였다. 본 연구를 위해 표집된 일반논문 또는 연구논문들을 연구분야, 성별, 소속기관, 지역, 기관유형, 지도관계 등의 변수에 따라 분류하였다. 본연구의 주된 결과는 몇가지로 요약된다. 첫째, 공동저술은 소속을 달리하는 저자들 사이에서 주로 이루어지나, 소속을 달리 하는 경우라도 공저자들의 소재지역이 동일 지역인 경우가 대부분이고 특히 서울지역이 주를 이루고 있다는 점이다. 둘째, 대학교수들 간의 공동 저술이 지배적이다. 셋째, 사제지간에 공동저술이 증가하고 있다는 점이다. 넷째, 전체적으로 저술활동이 남성들에 의해 지배되고 있는 한편으로 여성들 사이에서 공동저술경향이 매우 높게 나타나고 있다는점이다. 이러한 결과를 통해 보면, 성별, 지도관계, 소속기관의 소재지, 소속기관의 유형 등은 공동저술의 ‘유유상종’ 모형을 반영하고 있는 한편, 소속기관 자체는 공동저술의 ‘이종연횡’ 모형을 반영하고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. 권경득. (1996). 한국행정학의 연구경향에 관한 분석: 한국행정학보 기고논문의 연구영역과 연구방법을 중심으로(1967-1995). '한국행정학회 기획세미나 발표논문집': 1-29
  2. 김상구. (2004). 지방정부에 관한 연구경향: 지방정부연구에 게재된 논문을 중심으로. '한국행정학회 추계학술대회 발표논문집': 837-851
  3. 신무섭. (1996). 한국행정학의 연구경향과 과제: 한국행정학보를 중심으로. '한국행정학회 기획세미나 발표논문집': 57-79
  4. 이병렬.박기관. (2002). 한국 지방자치학 분야의 연구경향 분석: 한국지방자치학회보 기고논문(1989-2001)의 내용분석을 중심으로. '한국지방자치학회보', 14(1): 23-42
  5. 이재은. (2002). 한국의 조직이론 연구경향 분석. '한국행정학회 하계학술대회 발표논문집': 199-217
  6. 주상현. (2002). 한국 행정학 연구경향의 실증적 분석: 최근 7년(1995-2001)간 한국행정학보 기고논문을 중심으로. '한국행정학보', 36(3): 39-55
  7. 최성욱. (2004). 거버넌스 개념에 대한 비판적 고찰: 한국행정학계의 거버넌스 연구경향분석. '정부학연구', 10(1): 239-261
  8. 최영훈. (2005). 이공계대학 연구비관리체제의 주요 쟁점 및 개선방안. '한국정책분석평가학회 춘계학술대회 발표논문집'
  9. 최영훈.이강춘.백종윤.김의석. (2008). 공기업 기술혁신 모형 개발에 관한 연구. '한국공공관리학보', 22(4): 207-241
  10. 하태권. (1995). 한국인사행정의 실증적 연구에 대한 고찰: 연구경향과 연구결과를 중심으로. '한국행정학보', 29(4): 1463-1483
  11. 한인숙. (1985). 한국 지방자치행정의 연구경향. '한국행정학보', 19(1): 1-11
  12. Acedo, F. J., C. Barroso, C. Casanueva, J. L. Galan. (2006). Co-Authorship in Management and Organizational Studies: An Empirical and Network Analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5): 957-983 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x
  13. Allen, Thomas J. (1977). Managing the Flow of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  14. Ballard, W. (2005). Editor's Page: Determining Authorship. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 33(3): 801 https://doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[801:DA]2.0.CO;2
  15. Barnett, A. H., R. W. Ault, D. L. Kaserman. (1988). The Rising Incidence of Co-authorship in Economics: Further Evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(3): 539-543 https://doi.org/10.2307/1926798
  16. Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its study): Past, Present, and Future. Scientometrics, 52(3): 365-377 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014254214337
  17. Beaver, D. D. (2004). Does Collaborative Research Have Greater Epistemic Authority? Scientometrics, 60(3): 399-408 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034382.85360.cd
  18. Ben-David, Joseph; Teresa A. Sullivan (1975). Sociology of Science. Annual Review of Sociology, 1: 203–222 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.01.080175.001223
  19. Bird, J. E. (1997). Authorship Patterns in Marine Mammal Science, 1985-1993. Scientometrics, 39(1): 99-105 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457432
  20. Bozeman, B., J. Rogers. (2002). A Churn Model of Scientific Knowledge Value: Internet Researchers as a Knowledge Value Collective. Research Policy, 31: 769-794 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00146-9
  21. Bozeman, B., V. Mangematin. (2004). Editor's Introduction: Building and Deploying Scientific and Technical Human Capital. Research Policy, 33: 565-568 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.004
  22. Brass, D. J. (1995). A Social Network Perspective on Human Resources Management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13: 39-79
  23. Crase, D., & F. D. Rosato. (1992). Single versus Multiple Authorship in Professional Journals. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 63(7): 28-31 https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1992.10609913
  24. Cronin, B. (1996). Rates of Return of Citation. Journal of Documentation, 52(2): 188-197 https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026967
  25. De Haan, J. (1997). Authorship Patterns in Dutch Sociology. Scientometrics, 39(2): 197-208 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457448
  26. Follette, L. (1992). Stealing into Print. Berkeley, CA: The Unviersity of California Press
  27. Friere, P. (1985). The Politics of Education. South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey
  28. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1361-1380
  29. Gray, B. (2004). Strong Opposition: Frame-based Resistance to Collaboration. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14: 166-176 https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.773
  30. Hamermesh, D. S., G. E. Johnson, & B. A. Weisbrod. (1982). Scholarship, Citation and Salaries: Economic Reward in Economic. Southern Economic Journal, 49: 472-481 https://doi.org/10.2307/1058497
  31. Hamermesh, Daniel S., & Sharon M. Oster. (2002). Tools or Toys? The Impact of High Technology on Scholarly Productivity. Economic Inquiry, 40(4): 539-555 https://doi.org/10.1093/ei/40.4.539
  32. Hara, N., Paul Solomon, Seung-Lye Kim, & Diane H. Sonnenwald. (2003). An Emerging View of Scientific Collaboration: Scientists’ Perspectives on Collaboration and Factors that Impact Collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(10): 952-965 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10291
  33. Houston, David J., & Sybil M. Delevan. (1990). Public Administration Research: An Assessment of Journal Publications. Public Administration Review, 50(6): 674-681 https://doi.org/10.2307/976978
  34. Hudson, J. (1996). Trends in Multi-Authored Papers in Economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(3): 153-158 https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.10.3.153
  35. Kanter, R. M. (1994). Collaborative Advantage: Successful Partnerships Manage the Relationship, not Just the Deal. Harvard Business Review, July-Aug: 96-108
  36. Katz, J. S., & D. M. Hicks. (1995). Questions of Collaboration. Nature, 375: 99
  37. Katz, D., & R. L. Kahn, (1978), The Social Psychology of Organizations, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons
  38. Katz, J. S., & B. R. Martin. (1997). What is Research Collaboration?. Research Policy, 26: 1-18 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
  39. Kavanaugh, A. L., D. D. Reese, J. M. Carroll, & M. B. Rosson. (2005). Weak Ties in Networked Communities. The Information Society, 21: 119-131 https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240590925320
  40. Kretschmer, H. (1997). Patterns of Behaviour in Coauthorship Networks of Invisible Colleges. Scientometrics, 40(3): 579-591 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459302
  41. Laband, David N., & Michael J. Piette. (1995). Team Production in Economics: Division of Labor or Mentoring. Labour Economics, 2: 33-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-5371(95)80005-I
  42. Laband, David N., & John M. Wells. (1998). The Scholarly Journal Literature of Economics: A Historical Profile of the AER, JPE, and QJE. American Economicst, 42(2): 47-58
  43. Laband, David N., & R. Tollison. (2000). Intellectual Collaboration. Journal of Political Economy, 108(3): 632-662
  44. Leggon, C. B., & S. M. Malcom, (1994). Human Resources in Science and Engineering: Policy Implications. pp.141–152. in W. Pearson Jr. and A. Fechter. eds. Who Will Do Science? Educating the Next Generation, Baltimore, London: The Johns Hopkins University Press
  45. Lewison, G. (2001). The Quantity and Quality of Female Researchers: A Bibliometric Study of Iceland. Scientometrics, 52(1): 29-43 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012794810883
  46. Manton, Edgar J., & Donald E. English. (2007). The Trend Toward Multiple Authorship in Business Journals. Journal of Education for Business, 82(3): 164-168 https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.82.3.164-168
  47. Maule, E. & M. Bordons. (2006). Productivity, Impact and Publication Habits by Gender in the Area of Materials Science. Scientometrics, 66(1): 199-218 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0014-3
  48. Mazur, Amy G., & Cornell W. Clayton. (2008). Sixty Years of Political Science. Political Research Quarterly, 61(1): 3-10 https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907312852
  49. McDowell, John M., & M. Melvin. (1983). The Determinants of Co-Authorship: An Analysis of the Economics Literature. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 65: 155-160 https://doi.org/10.2307/1924423
  50. Melin, G. (1996). The Networking University. Scientometrics, 35(1): 15-31 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018230
  51. Melin, G., & O. Persson. (1996). Studying Research Collaboration Using Co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3): 363-377 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02129600
  52. Moody, J. (2004). The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review, 69(2): 213-238
  53. Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship Networks and Patterns of Scientific Collaboration. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 101: 5200-5205 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307545100
  54. Norris, R. P. (1993). Authorship Patterns in CJNR: 1970-1991. Scientometrics, 28: 151-158 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016897
  55. Persson, O., G. Melin, R. Danell, & A. Kaloudis. (1997). Research Collaboration at Nordic Universities. Scientometrics, 39(2): 209-223 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457449
  56. Piette, M. J., & K. L. Ross. (1992). An Analysis of the Determinants of Co-authorship in Economics. Journal of Economic Education, 23(3): 277-283 https://doi.org/10.2307/1183230
  57. Powell, Walter W., & S. Godal. (2005). Networks of Innovators, pp.56-85. in Jan Fagerberg, David C. Mowery, and Richard R. Nelson. edited. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  58. Price, D. J. de Solla. (1963, 1986). Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press
  59. Rigby, J., & J. Edler. (2005). Peering Inside Research Networks: Some Observations on the Effect of the Intensity of Collaboration on the Variability of Research Quality. Research Policy, 34: 784-794 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.004
  60. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edition. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Adult Publishing Group
  61. Rogers, E. M., & D. L. Kincaid, (1981). Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research, New York, NY: The Free Press
  62. Sauer, R. D. (1988). Estimates of the Return to Quality and Coauthorship in Economic Academy. Journal of Political Economy, 96(4): 855–866 https://doi.org/10.1086/261566
  63. Stallings, Robert A., & James M. Ferris. (1988). Public Administration Research: Work in PAR, 1940 to 1984. Public Administration Review, 48(1): 580-587 https://doi.org/10.2307/975522
  64. Trickett, Edison J., & Susan L. Ryerson Espino. (2004). Collaboration and Social Inquiry: Multiple Meanings of a Construct and Its Role in Creating Useful and Valid Knowledge. American Journal of Community Psychology, 34(1/2): 1-69 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AJCP.0000040146.32749.7d