Journal of Korea Planning Association (국토계획)

Korea Planning Association (대한국토도시계획학회)
권호 표지

Analysis on the Accessibility to Natural Greenspace and Urban Parks byIncome Class Factors -Focusing on Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do-

소득계층요인에 따른 자연녹지와 도시공원의 접근성 분석 -경기도 성남시를 대상으로-

Lim, Yu-Ra;Chu, Jang-Min;Shin, Ji-Young;Bae, Hyun-Joo;Park, Chang-Seok
임유라;추장민;신지영;배현주;박창석

  • Published : 20090400
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Natural greenspace and urban parks provide places for people to experience nature and engage in physical activity. For these reasons, greenspace and urban parks can be an index of environmental benefits. An equity mapping analysis was used to evaluate the area and the accessibility to the greenspace and urban parks by socioeconomic status. This study analyzed the accessibility of greenspace and urban parks in Seongnam-si, according to their locations using a Geographic Information System (GIS). In Seongnam-si, we found patterns of inequity in the distribution of urban parks and greenspace. This inequity can cause environmental inequity due to the lack of opportunity to use the greenspace and urban parks. The study shows how a GIS-based buffer analysis in conjunction with statistical analysis of socioeconomic data can be used to analyse the equity of access to community greenspace and urban parks. The results can be used to inform the local planning process and the GIS approach can be expanded into other local authority domains.

Keywords

References

  1. 국토해양부, 2009. '시공원 및 녹지 등에 관한 법률 시행규칙', 경기도
  2. 문선욱.최윤희, 2004. '도시 가로공간과 시설물디자인에 관한 연구', '한국디자인과학학회', 21-30
  3. 신지영, 2009. '도시공원 분포의 형평성 분석에 관한 연구', '한국환경복원녹화학회지', 12(2) :31-41
  4. 오규식.정승현, 2005. 'GIS 분석에 의한 도시공원 분포의 적정성 평가', '국토계획', 40(3):189-203
  5. 정유진.이선주.유효정, 2001. '신도시 개발과정에서 나타나는 신.구시가지의 격차에 관한여(분당과 성남시의 사례를 중심으로', '이화행정', (10):135-154
  6. 한국환경정책.평가연구원, 2007. 도시지역 저소득계층 보호를 위한 환경정책 연구 I-경제.인문사회연구회
  7. 홍형옥.지은영, 2002. '사회계층별 노인생활지원 주택에 대한 태도와 선호', '한국가정관리학회지', 20(2)：83-95
  8. Agymen, J., 2001. 'Ethnic minorities in britain,' Journal of Environmental Policy Plan, 3:15-30 https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080108559291
  9. Alexis Combera, Chris Brunsdon, Edmund Green., 2008. 'Using a GIS-based network analysis to determine urban greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups', Landscape and Urban Planning, 86: 103-114 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.01.002
  10. Frumkin, H., 2001. 'Beyond toxicity', American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20: 47-53
  11. Gobster, P.H., 2002. 'Managing urban parks for racially and ethnically diverse clientele', Leisure Sciences, 24(2):143-159 https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400252900121
  12. Kahn, P.H., 1999. 'The human relationahip with nature,' MIT Press
  13. Karen E. Smoyer-Tomic , Jared N. Hewko , M. John Hodgson, 2004. Spatial Accessibility and Equity of Playgrounds in Edmonton, Canada, The Canadian Geographer, 48(3):287-302 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0008-3658.2004.00061.x
  14. Nik Heynen, Harold A. Perkins, Parama Roy, 2006 "The Politivcal of Ecology of Uneven Urban Green Space", Urban Affairs Review, 42 :3-25 https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087406290729
  15. Talen, E,. 1998. 'Visualizing fairness equity maps for planners', Journal of American Planning Association, 64(1):22-38 https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369808975954
  16. Jennifer W., P. Wilson, J. Fehrenbach., 2005. "Parks and park funding in Los Angeles : an equity mapping analysis," Urban Ecology, 26(1):4-35 https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.26.1.4