Journal of Local Government Studies (한국지방자치학회보)

The Korean Association for Local Government Studies (한국지방자치학회)
권호 표지

지방공무원의 이직의도 영향요인에 관한 연구: 기능적, 금전적, 연대적 선호

Yang, Seung-Beom
양승범

  • Published : 20090900
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of functional, pecuniary, and solidary preferences on turnover intention among Korean local government employees. This study was conducted by surveying city government employees in the Seoul Metropolitan area. OIS multiple regression analysis was employed to examine the determinants of turnover intention. As results, this study found that functional preferences was significantly related to turnover intention of Korean local government employees. Specifically, job involvement was a significant determinant of turnover intention. The key finding of this research is consistent with prior work that functional preferences is an important variable that explains bureaucratic turnover intention. Some of the managerial implications and policy recommendations are discussed in the study.

Keywords

References

  1. 권용수.(2006), '사회복지전담공무원의 직부스트레스 유발요인 및 이직의도에 관한 실증적 연구', '한국행정논집', 18(3), 743-764
  2. 김정헌. 송건섭. 이곤수.(1999), '사회복지전문요원의 이직의도 영향요인에 관한 연구'. '복지행정논총', 9, 127-143
  3. 박희서.오세윤. 노시평.(2001), '일선 공무원의 역할스트레스가 이직충동에 미친 영향에 대한 경로분석모형 검증: 남녀간 차이를 중심으로'. '한국행정학보', 35(3), 197-219
  4. 이준상. 김만호.(2005), '사회복지사의 조지몰입 수준이 이직의도에 미치는 영향'. '한국행정논집', 17(3), 761-784
  5. 이환범. 이수창.(2006), '경찰공무원의 직무스트레스, 직무만족, 조직몰입과 이직의도 간의 상호관계에 관한 연구', '한국조직학회보', 3(2), 83-101
  6. 정윤길.손경희.(2006), '경력정체가 맥락적 성과와 이직의도에 미치는 영향 및 근속기간의 조절효과'. '한국정책과학회보', 10(2), 103-128
  7. 하만용.(2001), '조직유형과 직위에 따른 이직도와 조직몰입의 관계: 메타분석적 연구'. '한국행정학회보', 35(3), 181-196
  8. Alchian, A and Demsetz, H(1972), Production, infonnation costs and economic organization, American Economic Review, 62(1), 777-795
  9. Bertelli, A. M.(2007), Detenninants of bureaucratic turnover intention: evidence from the Department of Treasury, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 235-258 https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul003
  10. Brass, D. J.(1981), Structural relationships, job characteristics, and worker satisfaction and performance, Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 331-348 https://doi.org/10.2307/2392511
  11. Brehm, J. O. and Gates, S.(l997), Working, shirking, and sabotage: Bureaucratic response to a democratic public. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press
  12. Oark, P. B. and WIlson, J. Q.(196l), Incentive system: A theory of organization, Administrative Science Quarterly, 6, 129- 166 https://doi.org/10.2307/2390752
  13. Daley, D. M(1986), Humanistic management and organizational success: The effect of job and work environment characteristics on organizational effectiveness, public responsiveness, and job satisfaction, Public Personnellv1anagement, 15, 131-142
  14. Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (1985), Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press
  15. Ernmert, M. A. and Taher, W. A.(1992), Public sector professionals: The effects of public sector jobs on motivation, job satisfaction and work involvement, American Review of Public Administration, 22, 37-48 https://doi.org/10.1177/027507409202200103
  16. GroInick, W. S. and Ryan, R. M .(1987), Autonomy in children's learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5), 890-898
  17. Kanungo, R. N.(1982), Measurement of job and work involvement, Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 341-349
  18. Kellough, J. E. and Osuna, W.(1995), Cross-agency comparisons of quit rates in the federal service: Another look at the evidence, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 15(4), 58-68 https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X9501500406
  19. Kim, S. E. and Lee, J. W.(2007), Is mission attachment an effective management tool for employee retention? An empirical analysis of a nonprofit human services agency, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27, 227-248 https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X06295791
  20. Koestner, R. and Losier, G. E.(2002), Distinguishing three ways of being internally motivated: A closer look at introjection, identification, and intrinsic motivation, in Ded, E. L and Ryan, R. M (Eds.), Handbook of self-detennination research (pp.101-121). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press
  21. Lee, S.-Y and Whitford, A B.(2008), Exit, voice, loyalty, and pay: Evidence from the public workforce, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 647-671 https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum029
  22. Lodahl, T. M and Kenjer, M(l965), The definition and measurement of job involvement, Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 23-33
  23. Mathieu, J. E. and Zajac, D. M.(l990), A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates and consequences of organizational commitment, Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194
  24. Meier, K J. and Hicklin, A (2008), Employee turnover and organizational performance: Testing a hypothesis from classical public administration, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 573-590. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum028
  25. Mobley, W. H.(1982), Employee turnover: causes, consequences and control. Readings, MA,: Addison-Wesley
  26. Moynihan, D. P. and Landuyt, N.(2008), Explaining turnover intention in state government: Examining the roles of gender, life cycle, and loyalty, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28(2), 120-143 https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X08315771
  27. Nachmias, D.(1988), The quality of work life in the federal bureaucracy: Conceptualization and measurement, American Review of Public Administration, 18, 165-173 https://doi.org/10.1177/027507408801800205
  28. Niskanen, W.(1975), Bureaucrats and politicians. Journal of Law and Economics, 18 (December), 617-643 https://doi.org/10.1086/466829
  29. Parasuraman, S. and Alutto, J. A(1984), Sources and outcomes of stress in organizational settings: Toward the development of a structural model, Academy of Management Journal, 27(2), 330-350 https://doi.org/10.2307/255928
  30. Ryan, R.M. and Deci, E. L.(2006), Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will?, Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1557-1585 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x
  31. Saleh, S. D. and Hosek, ].(1976), Job involvement: Concept and measurement, Academy of Management Journal, 19, 213-224 https://doi.org/10.2307/255773
  32. Salisbury, R.H.(1969), An exchange theory of interest groups, Midwest Journal of Political Science, 13(1), 1-32 https://doi.org/10.2307/2110212
  33. Selden, S. C. and Moynihan, D. P.(2000), A model of voluntary turnover in state government, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 20(2), 63-74 https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X0002000206
  34. Ting, Y.(l997), Determinants of job satisfaction of federal government employees, Public Personnel Management, 26, 313-334
  35. Utman, C.H.(l997), Performance effects of motivational state: a meta-analysis, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(2), 170-182 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0102_4