Women's Health Nursing (여성건강간호학회지)

Korean Society of Women Health Nursing (한국여성건강간호학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Mother's Prenatal Care and Delivery Services Satisfaction according to Mode of Delivery

분만유형별 산모의 산전관리 실태와 분만서비스 만족도

  • Published : 2009.12.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to provide fundamental information about childbirth and antenatal care for pregnancy women and to find differences in mother's antenatal care and delivery service satisfaction between vaginal delivery and cesarean section. Methods: This study was conducted in 4 residential areas and a study sample of 184 postpartum mothers who agreed to collect data. Data was collected from September 1 to October 20 2007 and a structured questionnaire were recruited by the survey. The data was analyzed by t-test and chi-squire test using SPSS/WIN 12.0. Results: There was a significant difference in delivery place between vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery. Only 10.7% of vaginal delivery group delivered in general hospitals, however 24.5% of the cesarean section group delivered in general hospitals. Early antenatal care also showed statistical difference in mode of delivery. 43.5% of vaginal delivery mothers visited hospitals for the detection of pregnancy but 28.3% of cesarean section mothers did that. Vaginal delivery mothers more satisfied with her own delivery method and suggested a vaginal delivery to others. Conclusion: These results suggest that cesarean section mother's sensitivity of early antenatal care was less than vaginal delivery mother. Satisfaction related to delivery care services were higher in the vaginal delivery group.

Keywords

References

  1. Chang, S. B., Park, S. M., & Chung, C. W. (2004). Effect of Taegyo-focused prenatal education on maternal-fetal attachment and self-efficacy related to childbirth. J Korean Acad Nurs, 34(8), 1409-1415.
  2. Childbirth Connection (2006). Listening to Mothers II: Report of the Second National U. S. Survey of Women's Ouldbearing Experiences.
  3. Cho, D. S. (1987). A shldy on the taekyo behm'ior of women who had given birth and the health projessionals perception of Taekyo. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Y onsei University, Seoul.
  4. Cho, S. Y., & Koh, H. J. (1999). A comparison of primiparas' perception of delivery experience and identity as the mother according to delivery methods. Korean J Women Health Nurs, 5(1), 5-17.
  5. Emmett, C. L., Shaw, A. R., Montgomery, A. A., Murphy, D. J. & DiAMOND Study Group. (2006). Women's experience of decision making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: the role of health professionals and information about health risks. BJOG, 113(12), 1438-1445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01112.x
  6. Fabian, H. M., Radestad, l., & Waldenstrom, U. (2004). Characteristics of Swedish women who do not attend childbirth and parenthood education classes during pregnancy. Midwifery, 20(3), 226-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2004.01.003
  7. Gibbins, L. & Thomson, A. M. (2001). Women's expectations and experiences of childbirth. Midwifery, 17, 302-313. https://doi.org/10.1054/midw.2001.0263
  8. Giulia, C., Francesco, F., & Carlo, A. P. (2008). Are cesarean deliveries more likely for poorly educated parents? A brief report from Italy. Birth, 35(3), 241-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00245.x
  9. Han, J. Y. (2008). Study of the application of a teratogen-risk information service. TIlC annual report of KFDA, 11. from http://www.nifds.go.kr
  10. Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (2007). From http://www.hira.or.kr
  11. Jeffery, B. G., Barbara, D., & Randall, S. S. (1989). Socioeconomic differences in rates of cesarean section. N Engl J Med, 321(4), 233-239. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198907273210406
  12. Jeon, H. S., & Seo, H. G. (2003). Abortion in Korea since 1945. Korean J Med Hist, 12(2), 129-143.
  13. Kim, K. W., & Lee, K. H. (1998). Woman's experience of risk situation on the high-risk pregency. Korean J Women Health Nurs, 4(1), 121-133.
  14. Kim, S. K., Cho, A. J., Kim, Y. K., Do, S. R., & Lee, K. W. (2006). 2006 The surpey on the national fertility, family health & welfare in Korea. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
  15. Lee, J. A., Park, I. S., Moon, Y. S., & Lee, N. H. (2007). Influencing factors on family stress, fanuly meaning and family adaptation in families with high risk neonates. J Korean Acad Nurs, 37(4), 431-441.
  16. Nilsson, C., & Lundgren, I. (2009). Women's lived experience of fear of childbirth. Midwifery, 25, e1-e9.
  17. Pascal, G., & Beatrice, B. (2001). Trends in risk factors for caesarean sections in france between 1981 and 1995: Lessons for reducing the rates in the future. BJOG, 108(1), 48-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-5456(00)00009-7
  18. Statistics Korea (2007). From http://www.kostat.go.kr
  19. Tschudin, S., Alder, L. Hendriksen, S., Bitzer, L. Popp, K. A., Zanetti, R., Hosli, J., Holzgreve, W., & Geissbuhler, V. (2009). Previous birth experience and birth anxiety: Predictors of caesarean section on demand? J Psychosom Obstet Gymaecol, 18, 1-6.

Cited by

  1. 고령임부와 35세 미만 임부의 산전 건강관리 실태와 교육요구 비교 vol.19, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2013.19.4.230
  2. 미산부의 산전교육 참여 현황과 분만, 산후관리, 신생아 양육 관련 지식 및 태도 vol.22, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2016.22.3.139