DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Performance Optimization of a Continuous Monitoring Method for Hazardous VOCs in the Ambient Atmosphere

환경대기 중 유해성 VOC에 대한 자동연속 측정방법의 성능 최적화에 관한 연구

  • Son, Eun-Seong (Department. of Environmental Engineering, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Seo, Young-Kyo (Department. of Environmental Engineering, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Hyun (Department. of Environmental Engineering, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Lee, Min-Do (National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Han, Jin-Seok (National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Baek, Sung-Ok (Department. of Environmental Engineering, Yeungnam University)
  • Published : 2009.12.31

Abstract

Recently, there has been a keen demand for real-time automatic monitoring of VOCs not only in Korea but other developed countries. We carried out this study to evaluate and to optimize the performance of a continuous automatic monitoring system for hazardous VOCs (HVOCs) in the ambient atmosphere, using an on-line GC system. The online system normally consisted of a Nafion dryer prior to a cold trap of an automatic thermal desorption apparatus and a GC system equipped with two detectors, i.e. PID and ECD. Preliminary tests conducted to check out any contamination of the system revealed an evidence of significant artifact formation of benzene, and it was found that the Nafion dryer (even brand new one) is the source of the benzene artifact. Thus, all the subsequent experiments in this study was carried out inevitably by removing the Nafion dryer. The on-line GC method was investigated with a variety of QC/QA performance criteria such as repeatability, linearity, lower detection limits, and accuracy. In order to find out the best operating condition for the on-line GC system, three different types (in terms of adsorption strength) of cold trap combinations were tested, i.e. (i) Tenax-TA and Carbopack-B combination (weak and hydrophobic); (ii) Tenax-TA, Carbopack-X and Carboxen-1000 combination (strong and hydrophilic); and (iii) Tenax-TA and Carbopack-X combination (medium and hydrophobic/hydrophilic). The USEPA TO-17 manual method was selected as a reference method to evaluate the performance of the on-line method. A series of experiments revealed that the system performance was superior to others when a cold trap packed with hydrophilic adsorbents (Tenax-TA/Carbopack-X/Carboxen-1000 combination) was used and operated at $25^{\circ}C$. However, the system with a cold trap packed with a combination of Tenax-TA and Carbopack-X is more recommended for field applications since the carboxen-1000 adsorbent is too sensitive to water vapor, and hence the performance of the system might be very unstable to humid samples or during rainy days. Furthermore, the precision and accuracy criteria of the Tenax-TA/ Carbopack-X combination were generally compatible with the triple adsorbents cold trap. The continuous automatic monitoring method is, thus, considered very useful to real-time monitoring to understand the variations of VOCs concentrations in ambient air, as it adopts much simpler procedures in sampling, analysis, and data integration steps than manual monitoring methods. However, it should be noted that there is a high possibility of benzene artifacts formation through the Nafion dryer, which is often installed to remove water vapor in air samples before being adsorbed onto the cold trap. Therefore, if a Nafion dryer is used in any studies of monitoring VOCs, the benzene contamination should be carefully examined before carrying out obtaining the data.

Keywords

References

  1. Baek, S.O. and Y.H. Moon (2004) Evaluation of adsorbent sampling methods for volatile organic compounds in indoor and outdoor air, Korean J. of Anal. Sci. Technol., 17(6), 496-513. (in Korean with English abstract)
  2. Baek, S.O., K.H. Kim, and G.S. Heo (2004) Air quality measurements and QC/QA (I) - principles and methodology, Korean J. of Atmos. Environ., 20(2), 237-249. (in Korean with English abstract)
  3. Baek, S.O. (2006) A study on hazardous air pollutants in Siwha and Banwol industrial area, Final Report of NIER. 109-169
  4. Field, R.A., M.E. Goldstone, J.N. Lester, and R. Perry (1992) The sources and behaviour of tropospheric anthropogenic voaltile organic compounds. Atmos. Environ., 26A, 2983-2996
  5. Heavner, D.L., M.W. Ogden, and P.R. Nelson (1992) Multisorbent thermal desorption/gas chromatography/mass selective detection method for the determination of target volatile organic compounds in indoor air, Environ. Sci. Technol., 26, 1737-1746 https://doi.org/10.1021/es00033a004
  6. Korea MOE (2005) Additional specification of HAPs 10 species including ethylbenzene and hydrazine, etc., Ministry of Environment Official Press Release (2005. Oct. 5th)
  7. Korea MOE (2006) Enforcement decree of the framework act on environmental policy, President Executive Directive No. 21621
  8. Ma, C.Y., J.T. Skeen, A.B. Dindal, C.K. Bayne, and R.A. Jenkins (1997) Performance ealuation of a thermal desorption/ gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric method for the characterization of waste tank headspace samples, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 853-859 https://doi.org/10.1021/es9605174
  9. Martin, N.A., D.J. Marlow, M.H. Henderson, B.A. Goody, and P.G. Quincey (2003) Studies using the sorbent Carbopack X for measuring environmental benzene with Perkin Elmer type pumped and diffusive samplers, Atmos. Environ., 37, 871-879 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)01000-2
  10. McClenny, W.A., M.W. Holdren, K.D. Oliver, J.D. Pleil, G.F. Evans, and W.T. Winberry (1991) Canister-based method for monitoring toxic VOCs in ambient air, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 41, 1308-1318 https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1991.10466924
  11. Ogle, L.D., D.A. Brymer, and R.L. Carlson (1993) Detector selection for the analysis of volatile organic air toxic compounds using U.S. EPA conpendium method TO14. In Sampling and Analysis of Air Pollutants. Edited by E.D. Winegar and L.H. Keith, Lewis Pub., Boca Raton, 103-131
  12. Oliver, K.D., W.A. McClenny, and E.H. Daughtrey (1995) Analysis of VOCs in ambient air using multisorbent packings for VOCs accumulation and sample drying, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 45, 792-800 https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1995.10467409
  13. Park, J.H., Y.K. Seo, and S.O. Baek (2006) A study on the comparison of atmospheric concentrations of volatile organic compounds in a large urban area and a suburban area, Korean J. of Atmos. Environ., 22(6), 767-778. (in Korean with English abstract)
  14. Shaw, S.L. (2001), The production of non-methane hydrocarbons by marine plankton, Doctoral Thesis, MIT, 138-140
  15. UKDOE(2007) http://www.airquality.co.uk/archive/networks_home.php (accessed 2007.10.10)
  16. USEPA (1990) Definition and procedure for the determination of the method detection limit, 40 CFR Part 136 (analytical procedure), appendix B, 319-321
  17. USEPA(1997) Compendium of methods TO-17, Determination of volatile organic compounds in ambient air using active sampling onto sorbent tubes, 2nd Ed., EPA/625/R-96/010b
  18. USEPA (1999) Compendium of Methods TO-14A, Determination of volatile organic compounds in ambient air using specially prepared canisters with subsequent analysis by gas chromatography, 2nd Ed., EPA/625/R-96/010b
  19. WHO(2000) Guidelines for Air Quality, geneva, 2000
  20. Woolfenden, E. (1997) Monitoring VOCs in air using sorbent tubes followed by thermal desorption-capillary GC analysis, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 47, 20-36 https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1997.10464411

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Measurement Methods for Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air Using Adsorbent Tubes and Canisters vol.32, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2016.32.3.305