The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

Effect of surface treatmet on the shear bond strength of a zirconia core to veneering ceramic

지르코니아 코어의 표면처리가 비니어링 세라믹과의 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향

  • Choi, Mi-Sun (Department of Esthetic Restorative Dentistry, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Soo (Department of Esthetic Restorative Dentistry, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University) ;
  • Suh, Kyu-Won (Department of Esthetic Restorative Dentistry, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University) ;
  • Ryu, Jae-Jun (Department of Esthetic Restorative Dentistry, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University)
  • 최미선 (고려대학교 임상치의학 대학원, 고려대학교 임상치의학연구소) ;
  • 김영수 (고려대학교 임상치의학 대학원, 고려대학교 임상치의학연구소) ;
  • 서규원 (고려대학교 임상치의학 대학원, 고려대학교 임상치의학연구소) ;
  • 류재준 (고려대학교 임상치의학 대학원, 고려대학교 임상치의학연구소)
  • Published : 2009.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this research was to evaluate the shear bond strength between zirconia core and veneer ceramic after surface treatment. Material and methods: Zirconia cores(N=40, n=10, $10mm{\times}10mm{\times}3mm$) were fabricated according to the manufacturers' instructions and ultrasonically cleaned. The veneering ceramics(thickness 3 mm) were built and fired onto the zirconia core materials. Four groups of specimens with different surface treatment were prepared. Group I: without any pre-treatment, Group II: treated with sandblasting, Group III: treated with liner, Group IV: treated with sandblasting and liner. The shear bond strength was tested in a universal testing machine. Data were compared with an ANOVA and $Scheff{\acute{e}}$ post hoc test(P=.05). Results: The shear bond strength of group VI was significantly higher than the other groups. Conclusion: Both mechanically and chemically treated simultaneously on zirconia core surface influenced the shear bond strength between the core and veneering ceramic in all-ceramic systems.

연구목적: 지르코니아 코어의 표면처리가 비니어링 세라믹과 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 한다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 지르코니아 블록(IPS e. max ZirCAD; Ivoclar vivadent, N=40, n=10, $10mm{\times}10mm{\times}3mm$)를 제조사의 지시에 따라 소성한 후 세척하였다. 대조군, 샌드블라스팅(4기압하 $50{\mu}m$ 알루미늄옥사이드) 처리군, 라이너(Zirliner; Ivoclar vivadent) 처리군, 샌드블라스팅과 라이너 처리군 네 개의 군으로 나누어 각 각 표면처리한 후 3 mm 두께로 세라믹(IPS e. max Ceram; Ivoclar vivadent)을 축조한다. 인스트론 만능시험기로 전단결합강도를 측정한 후, 일원변량 분산분석(One way ANOVA)과 $Scheff{\acute{e}}$검정법(P<.05)를 시행하였다. 결과: 지르코니아 코어와 세라믹 간 평균 전단결합강도는 샌드블라스팅과 라이너 동시 처리군에서 가장 높게 나타났으며, 지르코니아 코어에 샌드블라스팅과 라이너 단독 표면처리는 결합력에 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았으나(P>.05), 샌드블라스팅과 라이너 동시 표면처리는 두 재료 간 결합력에 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다(P<.05). 결론: 지르코니아 코어에 샌드블라스팅과 라이너 동시 처리시 전단결합강도의 증가를 보였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Dundar M, Ozcan M, Gokce B, Comlekoğlu E, Leite F, Valandro LF. Comparison of two bond strength testing methodologies for bilayered all-ceramics. Dent Mater 2007;23:630-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.05.004
  2. Al-Dohan HM, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Shear strength of core-veneer interface in bi-layered ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:349-55 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.009
  3. Daftary F., Donovan T. Effect of four pretreatment techniques on porcelain-to-metal bond strength. J Prosthet Dent 1986;58:535-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90380-5
  4. Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:652-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70103-4
  5. Braga RR, Ballester RY, Daronch M. Influence of time and adhesive system on the extrusion shear strength between feldspathic porcelain and bovine dentin. Dent Mater 2000;16:303-10 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00023-3
  6. Derand T, Molin M, Kvam K. Bond strength of composite luting cement to zirconia ceramic surfaces. Dent Mater 2005;21:1158-62 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.005
  7. Dundar M, Ozcan M, Comlekoglu E, Gungor MA, Artunc, C. Bond strengths of veneering ceramics to reinforced ceramic core materials. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:71-2
  8. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered allceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics. Dent Mater 2006;22:857-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.014
  9. Aboushelib MN, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2005;21:984-91 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.03.013
  10. Borges GA, Sophr AM, de Goes MF, Sobrinho LC, Chan DC. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:479-88 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(02)52704-9
  11. White SN, Miklus VG, McLaren EA, Lang LA, Caputo AA. Flexural strength of a layered zirconia and porcelain dental all-ceramic system. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:125-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.05.007
  12. Sundh A, Molin M, Sjogren G. Fracture resistance of yttrium oxide partially-stabilized zirconia all-ceramic bridges after veneering and mechanical fatigue testing. Dent Mater 2005;21:476-82 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.013
  13. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of allceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2004;20:449-56 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.002
  14. Sundh A, Sjogren G. A comparison of fracture strength of yttrium-oxide- partially-stabilized zirconia ceramic crowns with varying core thickness, shapes and veneer ceramics. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:682-8 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01284.x
  15. Anusavice KJ, Dehoff PH, Fairhurst CW. Comparative evaluation of ceramic-metal bond tests using finite element stress analysis. J Dent Res 1980;59:608-13 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345800590030901