Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지

A DOUBLE LAYERS TECHNIQUE FOR MAXILLARY SINUS AUGMENTATION WITH DEMINERALIZED AND MINERALIZED BONE GRAFT MATERIALS

탈회골과 비탈회골을 이용하여 2층 구조로 이식한 상악동골이식술

  • Lee, Eun-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medicine and Medical Research Institute, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Kyoung-Won (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medicine and Medical Research Institute, Chungbuk National University)
  • 이은영 (충북대학교 의과대학 구강악안면외과학교실, 의학연구소) ;
  • 김경원 (충북대학교 의과대학 구강악안면외과학교실, 의학연구소)
  • Published : 2009.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The maxillary posterior edentulous region presents unique and challenging conditions in implant dentistry. The height of the posterior maxilla is reduced greatly as a result of dual resorption from the crest of the ridge and pneumatization of the maxillary sinus after the loss of teeth. Materials previously used for sinus floor grafting include autogenous bone, allogeneic bone, xenogenic bone and alloplastic materials. Autogenous bone is the material of choice, but its use is limited by donor-site morbidity, complications, sparse availability, uncontrolled resorption and marked volume loss. One way to overcome this problem would be to use bone substitutes alone as a osteoconductive scaffold for bone regeneration from the residual bone or in combination with allogeneic bone, which also has osteoinductive properties. The purpose of this article is to describe a double layers technique of demineralized and mineralized bone graft materials instead of autogenous bone in sinus floor augmentation of deficient posterior maxillary alveolar process and to report our experience with this technique. Our results show that maxillary sinus augmentation using mineralized and demineralized bone materials, when installed simultaneously with the implant or not, is good results for bone healing.

Keywords

References

  1. Kent JN, Block MS: Simultaneous maxillary sinus floor bone grafting and placement of hydroxyapatite-coated implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47: 238, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(89)90225-5
  2. Loukota RA, Isaksson SG, Linner ELJ et al: A technique for inserting endosseous implants in the atrophic maxilla in a single stage procedure. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30: 46, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(92)90136-7
  3. Block MS, Kent JN: Sinus augmentation for dental implants: The use of autogenous bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55: 1281, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90185-3
  4. Haas R, Mailath G, D¨ortbudak O et al : Bovine hydroxyapatite for maxillary sinus grafting: Comparative histomorphometric findings in sheep. Clin Oral Implant Res 9: 107, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090206.x
  5. Schlegel KA, Fichtner G, Schultze-Mosgau S et al: Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips versus a bovine bone substitute. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18 : 53, 2003
  6. Johansson B, Grepe A, Wannfors K et al : A clinical study of changes in the volume of bone grafts in the atrophic maxilla. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 30: 157, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600601
  7. Moy PK, Lundgren S, Holmes RE: Maxillary sinus augmentation: Histomorphometric analysis of graft materials for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51 : 857, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80103-X
  8. Tatum SA, Kellman RM: Cranial bone grafting in maxillofacial trauma and reconstruction. Facial Plastic Surg 14: 117, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1085307
  9. Jensen OT, Greer R: Immediate placement of osseointegrated implants into the maxillary sinus augmented with mineralized cancellous allograft and Gore-Tex: Secondstage surgical and histological findings, in Laney WR, Tolman DE: Tissue Integration in Oral, Orthopedic, and Maxillofacial Reconstruction. Chicago, IL, Quintessence, 1992, p 321
  10. Trisi P, Rao W: The bone growing chamber: A new model to investigate spontaneous and guided bone regeneration in human artificial jaw bone defects. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 18: 151, 1998
  11. Smiler DG, Johnson PW, Lozada JL et al: Sinus lift grafts and endosseous implants. Dent Clin North Am 36: 151, 1992
  12. Hensch L: Bio ceramics: From concept to clinic. J Am Ceram Soc 74: 1487, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07132.x
  13. Whittaker JM, James RA, Lozada J et al: Histological response and clinical evaluation of heterograft and allograft materials in the elevation of the maxillary sinus for the preparation of endosteal dental implant sites. Simultaneous sinus elevation and root form implantation: An eight-month autopsy report. J Oral Implantol 15:141, 1989
  14. Kim YK, Kim SG, Lee BG: Bone graft and implant. Seoul, Narae Pub Co, 2007, p.169
  15. Boyne PJ, James RJ: Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 38: 613, 1980
  16. Block MS, Kent JN: Maxillary sinus grafting for totally and patially edentulous patients. J Am dent Assoc 124: 139, 1993
  17. Chanavaz M: Maxillary sius: Anatomy, physiology, surgery, and bone grafting related to implantology-Eleven years of surgical experience (1979-1990) J Oral Implantology XVI: 1999, 1990
  18. Hallman M, Hedin M, Sennerby L et al: A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone. J Oral maxillofac Surg 60: 277, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.30576
  19. Johansson B, Grepe A, Wannfors K et al: CT-scan in assessing volumes of bone grafts to the heavily resorbed maxilla. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 26: 85, 1998
  20. Hesen J, Sindet-Pedesen S: Autogenous mandibular bone grafts and osseointegrated implants for reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla: A preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49: 1277, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(91)90303-4
  21. Hallman M, Cederlund A, Lindskog S et al: A clinical and histologic study of bovine hydroxyapatite in combination with autogenous bone and fibrin glue for maxillary sinus floor augmentation: Results after 6 to 8 months of healing. Clin Oral Implants Res 12: 135, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002135.x
  22. Iezzi G, Scarano A, Mangano C et al: Histologic results from a human implant retrieved due to fracture 5 years after insertion in a sinus augmented with anorganic bovine bone. J Periodontol. 79(1): 192, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070105
  23. Hallman M, Zetterqvist L: A 5-year prospective follow-up study of implant-supported fixed prostheses in patients subjected to maxillary sinud floor augmentation with an 80:20 mixture of bovine hydroxyapatitie and autogenous bone. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 6: 82, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00030.x
  24. Kim YK, Yun PY, Im JH: Clinical retrospective study of sinus bone graft and implant placement. J Kor Maxillofac Plast and Reconst 30: 259, 2008
  25. Nishibori M, Betts NJ, Salama H et al: Short term healing or autogenous and allogeneic bone grafts after sinus augmentation-a report of 2 cases. J Perodontal 65: 958, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1994.65.10.958
  26. Urist MR : Bone formation by autoinduction. Science 150 : 893, 1965 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.150.3698.893
  27. Valentini P, Abensur D, Wenz B: Sinus grafting with porous bone mineral (Bio-Oss) for implant placement: a 5-year study on 15 patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 20(3): 245, 2000
  28. Urist MR: A bone morphogenetic system in residual bone matrix in the mouse. Clin Orthop 9: 210, 1983
  29. Lee EY, Kim KW, UM IW et al: The histologic study of the grafted hBMP-I for immediate implant fixation. JKOMS 30(4) : 3, 2004
  30. Misch CE : Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 2nd ed. Michigan, WB Saunders, 2000, p.502
  31. Hatano N, Shimizu Y, Ooya K : A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 15 : 339, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00996.x
  32. Antonio S, Marco D, Giovanna I et al : Maxillary sinus augmentation with different biomaterials: A comparative histologic and histomorphometric study in man. Implant Dent 15 : 197, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000220120.54308.f3
  33. Froum SJ, Tarnow DP, Wallace SS et al : Sinus floor elevation using anorganic bovine bone matrix(OsteoGraft/N) with and without autogenous bone: A clinical, histologic, radiographic, and histomorphometric analysis. Int J Peridontics Restorative Dent 18 : 529, 1998
  34. Hockers T, Abensur D, Valentini P et al : The combined use of bioresorbable membranes and xenografts or autografts in the treatment of bone defects around implants. A study in beagle dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 10 : 487, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100607.x
  35. Misch CE : Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 2nd ed. Michigan, WB Saunders, 2000, p.506
  36. Kim YK : Implant risk factor of sinus bone graft (I) : complication and early failure. Implantology 10 : 42, 2006
  37. Wannofors K, Johansson B, Hallman M et al : A prospective randomized study of 1- and 2-stage inlay bone grafts : 1-year follow up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implanrs 15 : 625, 2000
  38. Block MS, Kent JN, Kallukaran FU et al : Bone Maintenance 5 to 10 Years After Sinus Grafting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56 : 706, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90801-1