Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

EFFECT OF A DESENSITIZER ON DENTINAL BOND STRENGTH IN CEMENTATION OF COMPOSITE RESIN INLAY

레진 인레이 합착시 지각과민처리제의 사용이 상아질 결합강도에 미치는 영향

  • Han, Sae-Hee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Center, Chung Ang University Hospital) ;
  • Cho, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Colledge of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 한세희 (중앙대학교 병원 치과센터 치과보존과) ;
  • 조영곤 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보존학 교실)
  • Published : 2009.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a desensitizer on dentinal bond strength in cementation of composite resin inlay. Fifty four molar teeth were exposed the occlusal dentin. Class I inlay cavities were prepared and randomly divided into six groups. Control group: no agent, Group 1 : Isodan, Group 2 : One-step, Group 3 : All-Bond SE, Group 4 : Isodan + One-step, Group 5 : Isodan + All-Bond SE. Desensitizing agent and dentin bonding agents were applied immediately after the completion of the preparations. Impressions were then made. The composite resin inlays (Tescera, Bisco) were fabricated according to the manufacturers' guidelines. Cementation procedures followed a standard protocol by using resin cement (Bis-Cem, Bisco). Specimens were stored in distilled water at $37^{\circ}C$ for 24 hours. All specimens were sectioned to obtained sticks with $1.0{\times}1.0\;mm^2$ cross sectional area. The microtensile bond strength (${\mu}TBS$) was tested at crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data was analyzed using one way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Scanning electron microscopy analysis was made to examine the details of the bonding interface, 1. Group 1 showed significantly lower ${\mu}TBS$ than other groups (p<0.05). 2. There was no significant difference between the ${\mu}TBS$ of Group 3 and Group 5. 3. The ${\mu}TBS$ of Group 4 showed significantly lower than that of Group 2 (p<0.05). In conclusion, a desensitizer (Isodan) might have an adverse effect on the bond strength of composite resin inlay to dentin.

본 연구는 인레이 와동에서 인상을 채득하기 전 지각과민처리제 (Isodan)과 2단계 전부식 접착시스템 (One-Step)과 단일단계 자가부식 접착시스템 (All-Bond SE)으로 처리한 후, 복합레진 인레이를 자가 접착형 레진시멘트인 BisCem으로 합착시키는 경우 레진 인레이의 상아질에 대한 미세인장결합강도와 주사현미경적인 분석을 통하여 비교하였다. 본 연구의 결과, 지각과민처리제인 Isodan만을 사용하는 경우 레진 인레이의 결합강도를 감소시킬 수 있으므로 단독 사용보다는 단일 단계 자가부식 시스템 (All-Bond SE)과 같이 사용하는 것이 추천된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 송미혜, 박수정, 조현구, 황윤찬, 오원만, 황인남. 치과용 접착제가 복합레진 인레이와 레진 시멘트의 결합력에 미치는 영향. 대한치과보존학회지 33(5):419-426, 2008
  2. 김덕수, 박상혁, 최기운, 최경규. 접착레진의 부가도포가 레진시멘트의 결합강도에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구. 대한치과보존학회지 32(5):426-436, 2007
  3. 조민우, 박상혁, 김종률, 최경규. 레진시멘트의 접착 내구성에 관한 연구. 대한치과보존학회지 32(4):343-353, 2007 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.4.343
  4. Radovic I, Coniglio I, Magni E, Carvalho CA, Ferrari M. Luting fiber posts with self-adhesive cements: A push-out bond strength test. J Dent Res Appl 1(1):50-55, 2007
  5. Abo-Hamar SE, Hiller KA, Jung H, Federlin M, Friedl KH, Schmalz G. Bond strength of a new universal selfadhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel. Clin Oral Invest 9:161-167, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-005-0308-5
  6. Christensen GJ. Resin cements and postoperarive sensitivity. JADA 131:1197-1199, 2000 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0357
  7. Unemori M, Matsuya Y, Akashi A, Goto Y, Akamine A. Composite resin restoration and postoperative sensitivity clinical follow-up in an undergraduate program. J Dent 29:7-13, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00037-3
  8. Opdam NJM, .Roeters FJM, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 26:555-562, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00042-0
  9. 조영곤, 반일환, 유미경. 상아질 접착 후 저장기간에 따른 접착제의 접착력 변화. 대한치과보존학회지 30(3):204-214, 2005
  10. Tay FR, Hashimoto M, Pashley DH, Peters MC, Lay SC, Yiu CK, Cheong C. Aging affects two modes of nanoleakage expression in bonded dentin. J Dent Res 82(7):537-541, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910308200710
  11. Ozturk N, Aykent F. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. J Prosthe Dent 89:275-281, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.37
  12. Magne P, Kim TH, Cascione D, Donovan TE. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations. J Prosthe Dent 94:511-9, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.010
  13. Magne P, So WS, Cascione D. Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration placement. J Prosthe Dent 98(3):166-174, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60052-3
  14. Primali RJ, Pereira PNR, Nidaido T, Tagami J. Efficacy of a resin coating on bond strengths of resin cement to dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent 15(2):105-113, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00325.x
  15. Sengun A, Koyuturk AE, Sener Y, Ozer F. Effect of densensitizers on the bond strength of a self-etching adhesive system to careis-affected dentin on the gingival wall. Oper Dent 30-4:430-435, 2007
  16. Omae M, Inoue M, Itota T, Finger WJ, Inoue M, Tanaka K, Yamamoto K, Yoshiyama M. Effect of a desensitizing agent containing glutaraldehyde and HEMA on bond strength to Er:YAG laser-irradiated dentin. J Dent 35:398-402, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.11.004
  17. Akca T, Yazici AR, Celik C, Ozgunaltay G, Dayabgac B. The effects of desensitizing treatments on the bond strength of resin composite to dentin mediated by a self-etching primer. Oper Dent 32-5;451-456, 2007
  18. Brackett WW, Tay FR, Brackett MG, Dib A, Sword RJ, Pashley DH. The effects of chlorhexidine on dentin hybrid layers In Vivo. Oper Dent 32(2):107-111, 2007 https://doi.org/10.2341/06-55
  19. Craig RG. Overview of posterior composite resin for use in clinical practice in Vanherle G Smith DC(eds). Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials. St.Paul, 3M Co, 1985, p199-211
  20. Christensen GJ. Acceptability of alternatives for conservative restoration of posterior teeth. J Esthet Dent 7:228-232, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1995.tb00584.x
  21. Douglas WH, Fields RP, Fundingsland J. A comparison between the microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorative systems. J Dent 17:184-188, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(89)90072-9
  22. Technical data sheet : Espertise Rely X Unicem (2002) 3M ESPE, Seefeld Germany
  23. Suh BI. New strategies in Adhesive Dentistry : All-Bond 3 and All-Bond SE. J Dent Res Appl 1(1):2-6, 2007
  24. Christensen GJ. Preventing postoperative tooth sensitivity in Class I, II and V restorations JADA 133:229-231, 2002 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0149
  25. Paul SJ, Scharer P. The dual bonding technique : a modified to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 17:536- 545, 1997
  26. Aranha ACC, Siqueira Junior CA, Cavalcante LMA, Pimenta LAF, Marchi GM. Microtensile bond strengths of composite to dentin treated with densensitizer products. J Adhes Dent 8:85-90, 2006
  27. Yiu CKY, King NM, Suh BI.Sharp LJ, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Incompatibility of oxalate densensitizers with acidic, fluoride-containing totaletch adhesives. J Dent Res 84(8):730-735, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400809
  28. Fu B, Shen Y, Wang H, Hanning M. Sealing ability of dentin adhesives /densensitizer. Oper Dent 32-2:107-111, 2007 https://doi.org/10.2341/06-55

Cited by

  1. Microtensile bond strength of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements to dentin and indirect composite resin vol.35, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.2.106