Journal of Ecology and Environment

The Ecological Society of Korea (한국생태학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparison of Litterfall Dynamics in Three Coniferous Plantations of Identical Age under Similar Site Conditions

  • Jeong, Jae-Yeob (Department of Forest Resources, Jinju National University) ;
  • Kim, Choon-Sig (Department of Forest Resources, Jinju National University) ;
  • An, Hyun-Chul (Department of Forest Resources, Jinju National University) ;
  • Cho, Hyun-Seo (Department of Forest Resources, Jinju National University) ;
  • Choo, Gap-Chul (Department of Forest Resources, Jinju National University)
  • Published : 2009.05.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was carried out to evaluate litterfall dynamics in three adjacent coniferous tree plantations (larch: Larix leptolepis; red pine: Pinus densiflora; rigitaeda pine: P. rigitaeda) planted in the same year (1963), and growing under similar environmental conditions in the Sambong Exhibition Forests, Hamyang-gun, Gyeongsangnam-do. Litter was collected monthly between July 2006 and June 2008. Needle, broad leaf and total litter inputs followed a similar monthly pattern in the three coniferous plantations. The amounts of needles, flowers, and miscellaneous litter were significantly lower in the larch than in the two pine plantations, while branch litter was significantly higher in the larch than in the two pine plantations. Average total litterfall for two years was significantly higher for the pine (5,475 kg $ha^{-1}\;yr^{-1}$ for red pine and 5,290 kg $ha^{-1}\;yr^{-1}$ for rigitaeda pine) plantations than for the larch (3,953 kg $ha^{-1}\;yr^{-1}$ plantation. Needle litter comprised about 73.1% of total litterfall for the rigitaeda pine, 70.8% for the red pine and 62.9% for the larch plantations. Our results demonstrate that litterfall inputs can be affected by tree species.

Keywords

References

  1. Berg B, Laskowski R. 2006. Litter decomposition; A guide to carbon and nutrient turnover. Adv Ecol Res 38: 20-71
  2. Binkley D. 1986. Forest Nutrition Management. John Wiley & Sons, New York
  3. Bray JR, Gorham E. 1964. Litter production in forests of the world. Adv Ecol Res 2: 101-157 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60331-1
  4. Christensen O. 1975. Wood litter fall in relation to abscissions, environmental factors, and the decomposition cycle in a Danish oak forest. Oikos 26: 187-195 https://doi.org/10.2307/3543708
  5. Forestry Administration. 1994. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. (in Korean)
  6. Gessel SP, Turner J. 1976. Litter production in western Washington Douglas-fir stands. Forestry 49: 63-72 https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/49.1.63
  7. Gower ST, Son Y. 1992. Differences in soil and leaf litterfall nitrogen dynamics for five forest plantations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56: 1959-1966 https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600060051x
  8. Gresham CA. 1982. Litterfall patterns in mature loblolly and longleaf pine stands in costal South Carolina. For Sci 28: 223-231
  9. Kavvadias VA, Alifragis D, Tsiontsis A, Brofas G, Stamatelos G. 2001. Litterfall, litter accumulation and litter decomposition rates in four forest ecosystems in northern Greece. For Ecol Manage 144: 113-127 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00365-0
  10. Kim C, Koo KS, Kim YK, Lee WK, Jeong JH, Seo HS. 1997. Dynamics of litterfall and nutrient inputs in Quercus acutissima and Pinus koraiensis stands. FRl J For Sci 55: 13-18. (in Korean with English abstract)
  11. Kim C, Cho HS. 2004. Quantitave comparisons of soil carbon and nutrient storage in Larix leptolepis, Pinus densiflora and Pinus rigitaeda plantations. Korean J Ecol 27: 67-71 https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2004.27.2.067
  12. Kim C, Koo KS, Byun JK. 2005. Litterfall and nutrient dynamics in pine (Pinus rigida) and larch (Larix leptolepis) plantations. J Korean For Soc 94: 302-306
  13. Kim C, Park JY, Byun JK, Jeong J, Shin HC, Lee ST. 2008. Relationships between litterfall amounts and stand attributes in a Quercus accutissima stand. Korean J Agr For Metero 10: 102-106. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5532/KJAFM.2008.10.3.102
  14. Kim JG, Chang NK. 1989. Litter production and decomposition in the P. rigida plantation in Mt. Kwan-ak. Korean J Ecol 12: 9-20
  15. Kim JS, SonY, LimJH, KimZS. 1996. Aboveground biomass, N and P distribution, and litterfall in Pinus rigida and Larix leptolepis plantations. J Korean For Soc 85: 416-425. (in Korean with English abstract)
  16. Korea Forest Service. 2006. Statistical Year Book of Forestry. (in Korean)
  17. Mun HT, Joo HI. 1994. Litter production and decomposition in the Quercus acutissima and Pinus rigida forest. Korean J Ecol 17: 345-353. (in Korean with English abstract)
  18. Park J, Kim C, Jeong J, Byun JK, Son Y, Yi MJ. 2008. Effect of fertilization on litterfall amounts in a Quercus acutissima stand. J Korean For Soc 97: 582-588. (in Korean with English abstract)
  19. Pedersen LB, Bille-Hansen J. 1999. A comparison in litterfall and element fluxes in even aged Norway spruce, sitka spruce and beech stands in Denmark. For Ecol Manage 114: 55-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00381-8
  20. SAS Institute Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6 4th ed. Vol. 2 Cary, N.C.
  21. Sharma SC, Pande PK. 1989. Patterns of litter nutrient concentration in some plantation ecosystems. For Ecol Manage 29: 151-163 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(89)90046-7

Cited by

  1. Carbon and nitrogen status of litterfall, litter decomposition and soil in even-aged larch, red pine and rigitaeda pine plantations vol.123, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-010-0317-6
  2. Basal area effects on a short-term nutrient status of litter fall and needle litter decomposition in a Pinus densiflora stand vol.39, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2016.006