DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Weight Loss and Nutrient Dynamics during Leaf Litter Decomposition of Quercus mongolica in Mt. Worak National Park

  • Published : 2009.05.30

Abstract

Weight loss and nutrient dynamics of Quercus mongolica leaf litter during decomposition were investigated from December 2005 through August 2008 in Mt. Worak National Park as a part of National Long-Term Ecological Research Program in Korea. The decay constant (k) of Q. mongolica litter was 0.26. After 33 months decomposition, remaining weight of Q. mongolica litter was 49.3$\pm$4.4%. Initial C/N and C/P ratios of Q. mongolica litter were 43.3 and 2,032, respectively. C/N ratio in decomposing litter decreased rapidly from the beginning to nine months decomposition, and then showed more or less constant. C/P ratio increased to 2,407 after three months decomposition, and then decreased steadily thereafter. N and P concentration increased significantly during decomposition. N immobilization occurred from the beginning through 18 months decomposition, and mineralization occurred afterwards in decomposing litter. P immobilized significantly from fifteen months during decomposition. K concentration decreased rapidly from the beginning to six months decomposition. However it showed an increasing pattern during later stage of decomposition. Remaining K decreased rapidly during early stage of decomposition. There was no net K immobilization. Ca concentration increased from the beginning to twelve months decomposition, and then decreased rapidly till twenty one months elapsed. However, it increased again thereafter. Ca mineralization occurred from fifteen months. Mg concentration increased during decomposition. There was no Mg immobilization during litter decomposition. After 33 months decomposition, remaining N, P, K, Ca and Mg in Q. mongolica litter were 79.2, 110.9, 36.2, 52.7 and 74.4%, respectively.

Keywords

References

  1. Alhamd L, Arakaki S, Hagihara A. 2004. Decomposition of leaf litter of four species in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest, Okinawa Island, Japan. Forest Ecol Manag 202: 1-11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.062
  2. Allen SE, Grimshaw HM, Parkinson JA, Quarmby C. 1974. Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials. Blackwell. Oxford
  3. Baker TT, Lockaby BG, Conner WH, Meier CE, Stanturf JA, Burke MK. 2001. Leaf litter decomposition and nutrient dynamics in four southern forested floodplain communities. J Am Soc Soil Sci 65: 1334-1347 https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2001.6541334x
  4. Berendse F, Bobbink R, Rouwenhorst G. 1989. A comparative study on nutrient cycling in wetheathland ecosystems. II. Litter decomposition and nutrient mineralization. Oecologia 78: 338-348 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379107
  5. Moro MJ, Domingo F. 2000. Litter decomposition in four woody species in a Mediterranean climate: weight loss, N and P dynamics. Ann Bot 86: 1065-1071 https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2000.1269
  6. Berg B, StaafH. 1981. Leaching accumulation and release of nitrogen in decomposing forest litter. Ecol Bull 33: 163-178
  7. Berg B, Staaf H, Wessen B. 1987. Decomposition and nutrient release in needle litter from nitrogen-fertilized Scats pine (Pinus sylvestris) stands. Scand J Forest Res 2: 399-415 https://doi.org/10.1080/02827588709382478
  8. Dziadowiec H. 1987. The decomposition of plant litterfall in a oaklinden-hornbeam forest and an oak-pine mixed forest of the Bialoweza National Park. Acta Soc Bot Pol 56: 169-185 https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.1987.019
  9. Edmonds RL. Thomas TB. 1995. Decomposition and nutrient release from green needles of western hemlock and Pacific silver fir in an old-growth temperate rain forest, Olympic National Park, Washington. Can J Forest Res 25: 1049-1057 https://doi.org/10.1139/x95-115
  10. Enriquez S, Duarte CM, Sand-Jensen K. 1993. Patterns in decomposition rates among photosynthetic organisms: The importance of C:N:P content. Oecologia 94: 457-471 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00566960
  11. Fog K. 1988. The effect of added nitrogen on the rate of decomposition of organic matter. Bioi Rev 63: 433-462 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1988.tb00725.x
  12. Gosz JR, Likens GE, Bormann FH. 1973. Nutrient release from decomposing leaf and branch litter in the Hubbard Brook Forest, New Hampshire. Ecol Monogr 43: 173-191 https://doi.org/10.2307/1942193
  13. Janssen BH. 1996. Nitrogen mineralization in relation to C:N ratio and decomposability of organic materials. Plant and Soil 181: 39-45 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011290
  14. Jensen V. 1974. Decomposition of angiosperm tree leaf litter. In Biology of Plant Litter Decomposition. Vol 1 (Dickson CH, Pugh GJF, eds). Academic Press, New York. pp 69-104
  15. Klemmedson JO, Meier CE, Campbell RE. 1985. Needle decomposition and nutrient release in ponderosa pine ecosystems. Forest Sci 31: 647-660
  16. Lousier JD, Parkinson D. 1978. Chemical element dynamics in decomposing leaf litter. Can I Bot 56: 2795-2812 https://doi.org/10.1139/b78-335
  17. Mashner H. 1995. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 2nd edition. Academic Press, London
  18. Meentemeyer V. 1978. Macroclimate and lignin control of litter decomposition rates. Ecology 59: 465-472 https://doi.org/10.2307/1936576
  19. Melillo JM, Abcr JD, Muratore JF. 1982. Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63: 621-626 https://doi.org/10.2307/1936780
  20. Moro MI, Domingo F. 2000. Litter decomposition in four woody species in a Mediterranean climate: weight loss, N and P dynamics. Ann Bot 86: 1065-1071 https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2000.1269
  21. Namgung I, Han AR, Mun HI. 2008. Weight loss and nutrient dynamics during leaf litter decomposition of Quercus variabilis and Pinus densiflora at Mt. Worak National Park. J Ecol Field Biol 31: 291-295 https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2008.31.4.291
  22. Olson JS. 1963. Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44: 321-331
  23. Satchell IE. 1974. Litter - interface of animate/inanimate matter. In Biology of Plant Litter Decomposition. Vol. 1 (Dickinson CH, Pugh GJF, eds). Academic Press, New York. pp. xiii-xliv
  24. Schlesinger WH. 1985. Decomposition of chaparral shrub foliage. Ecology 66: 1353-1359 https://doi.org/10.2307/1939188
  25. Seereeram S, Lavender P. 2003. Analysis of leaf litter to establish its suitability for compositing to produce a commercially saleable product. A Report Prepared for SWAP. Aquat Environ p. 18
  26. Swift MI, Heal OW, Anderson IM. 1979. Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Studies in Ecology, vol. 5. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
  27. Taylor BR, Parkinson D, Parsons WFJ. 1989. Nitrogen and lignin content as predictor of litter decay rates: A microcosm test. Ecology 70: 97-104 https://doi.org/10.2307/1938416
  28. Wieder RK, Lang GE. 1982. A critique of the analytical methods used in examining decomposition data obtained from litter bags. Ecology 63: 1636-1642 https://doi.org/10.2307/1940104
  29. Xu X, Hirata E, Enoki T, Tokashiki Y. 2004. Leaflitter decomposition and nutrient dynamics in a subtropical forest after typhoon disturbance. Plant Ecol 173: 161-170 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VEGE.0000029319.05980.70

Cited by

  1. Decomposition and nutrient release temporal pattern of oil palm residues vol.164, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12094
  2. The community structures of the coniferous and deciduous dead wood-dwelling arthropods in Korea pp.17382297, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-5967.12028
  3. Effects of Tree Density Control on Carbon Dynamics in Young Pinus densiflora stands vol.105, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2016.105.3.275