Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Earthquake response of isolated cable-stayed bridges under spatially varying ground motions

  • Ates, Sevket (Department of Civil Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University) ;
  • Soyluk, Kurtulus (Department of Civil Engineering, Gazi University) ;
  • Dumanoglu, A. Aydin (Department of Civil Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University) ;
  • Bayraktar, Alemdar (Department of Civil Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University)
  • Received : 2007.07.16
  • Accepted : 2009.03.12
  • Published : 2009.04.20
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A comprehensive investigation of the stochastic response of an isolated cable-stayed bridge subjected to spatially varying earthquake ground motion is performed. In this study, the Jindo Bridge built in South Korea is chosen as a numerical example. The bridge deck is assumed to be continuous from one end to the other end. The vertical movement of the stiffening girder is restrained and freedom of rotational movement on the transverse axis is provided for all piers and abutments. The longitudinal restraint is provided at the mainland pier. The A-frame towers are fixed at the base. To implement the base isolation procedure, the double concave friction pendulum bearings are placed at each of the four support points of the deck. Thus, the deck of the cable-stayed bridge is isolated from the towers using the double concave friction pendulum bearings which are sliding devices that utilize two spherical concave surfaces. The spatially varying earthquake ground motion is characterized by the incoherence and wave-passage effects. Mean of maximum response values obtained from the spatially varying earthquake ground motion case are compared for the isolated and non-isolated bridge models. It is pointed out that the base isolation of the considered cable-stayed bridge model subjected to the spatially varying earthquake ground motion significantly underestimates the deck and the tower responses.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdel-Ghaffar, A.M. and Stringfellow, R.G. (1984), "Response of suspension bridges to travelling earthquake excitations, Part I-II", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 3, 62-81 https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-7277(84)90001-9
  2. Akkose, M., Adanur, S., Bayraktar, A. and Dumanoglu, A.A. (2007), "Stochastic seismic response of Keban Dam by finite element method", Appl. Math. Comput., 184, 704-714 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.05.186
  3. Ali, H.M. and Abdel-Ghaffar, A.M. (1994), "Seismic energy dissipation for cable-stayed bridges using passive devices", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 23, 877-893 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290230805
  4. Ates, S., Bayraktar, A. and Dumanoglu, A.A. (2006), "The effect of spatially varying earthquake ground motions on the stochastic response of bridges isolated with friction pendulum systems", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 26, 31-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.08.002
  5. Ates, S., Dumanoglu, A.A. and Bayraktar, A. (2005), "Stochastic response of seismically isolated highway bridges with friction pendulum systems to spatially varying earthquake ground motions", Eng. Struct., 27, 1843-1858 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.05.016
  6. Betti, R., Abdel-Ghaffar, A.M. and Niazy, A.S. (1993), "Kinematic soil-structure interaction for long-span cablesupported bridges", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 22, 415-430 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290220505
  7. Clough, R.W. and Penzien, J. (1993), Dynamics of Structures, 2nd ed. Singapore: McGraw Hill, Inc
  8. Constantinou, M.C. (2004), "Friction pendulum double concave bearing", NEES Report, available at: http://nees.buffalo.edu/dec304/FP-DC%20Report-DEMO.pdf
  9. Constantinou, M.C. and Papageorgiou, A.S. (1990), "Stochastic response of practical sliding isolation systems", Probabilist. Eng. Mech., 5, 27-34 https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-8920(90)90030-N
  10. Der Kiureghian, A. (1980), "Probabilistic modal combination for earthquake loading", in: Proceeding of Seventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul, 729-736
  11. Der Kiureghian, A. (1996), "A coherency model for spatially varying ground motions", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 25, 99-111 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199601)25:1<99::AID-EQE540>3.0.CO;2-C
  12. Der Kiureghian, A. and Neuenhofer, A. (1991), "A response spectrum method for multiple-support seismic excitations", In: Report No. UCB/EERC-91/08. Berkeley (CA): Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California
  13. Dumanoglu, A.A. and Sever, R.T. (1990), "Stochastic response of suspension bridges to earthquake forces", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 19, 133-152 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290190112
  14. Dumanoglu, A.A. and Soyluk, K. (2002), "SVEM: A stochastic structural analysis program for spatially varying earthquake motions", Turkish Earthquake Foundation, TDV/KT 023-76
  15. Fenz, D.M. and Constantinou, M.C. (2006), "Behaviour of double concave Friction Pendulum bearing", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35, 1403-1424 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.589
  16. Fleming, J.F. and Egeseli, E.A. (1980), "Dynamic behaviour of a cable-stayed bridge", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 8, 1-16 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290080102
  17. Garevski, M., Dumanoglu, A.A. and Severn, R.T. (1988), "Dynamic characteristics and seismic behaviour of Jindo Bridge, South Korea", Struct. Eng. Rev., 1, 141-149
  18. Harichandran, R.S. and Vanmarcke, E.H. (1986), "Stochastic variation of earthquake ground motion in space and time", J. Eng. Mech., 112, 154-174 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1986)112:2(154)
  19. Harichandran, R.S. and Wang, W. (1988), "Response of one- and two-span beams to spatially varying seismic excitation", In: Report to the National Science Foundation MSU-ENGR-88-002. Michigan (MI): Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Michigan State University
  20. Harichandran, R.S., Hawwari, A. and Sweidan, B.N. (1996), "Response of long-span bridges to spatially varying ground motion", J. Struct. Eng., 122, 476-484 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:5(476)
  21. Hyakuda, T., Saito, K., Matsushita, T., Tanaka, N., Yoneki, S., Yasuda, M., Miyazaki, M., Suzuki, A. and Sawada, T. (2001), "The structural design and earthquake observation of a seismic isolation building using Friction Pendulum system", Proceedings, 7th International Seminar on Seismic Isolation, Passive Energy Dissipation and Active Control of Vibrations of Structures, Assisi, Italy
  22. Jangid, R.S. and Banerji, P. (1998), "Effect of isolation damping on stochastic response of structures with nonlinear base isolators", Earthq. Spectra., 14, 95-114 https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585990
  23. Jung, H. and Park, K. (2004), "Spencer Jr BF, Lee I. Hybrid seismic protection of cablestayed bridges", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 33, 795-820 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.374
  24. Lou, L. and Zerva, A. (2005), "Effects of spatially variable ground motions on the seismic response of a skewed, multi-span, RC highway bridge", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 25, 729-740 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.016
  25. Morris, N.F. (1974), "Dynamic analysis of cable-stiffened structures", J. Struct. Eng. Div., ASCE, 100, 971-981
  26. Nakamura, Y., Der Kiureghian, A. and Liu, D. (1993), "Multiple-support response spectrum analysis of the Golden Gate Bridge", In: Report No. UCB/EERC-93/05. Berkeley (CA): Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California
  27. Nazmy, A.S. and Abdel-Ghaffar, A.M. (1987), "Seismic response analysis of cable stayed bridges subjected to uniform and multiple-support excitations", In: Report No. 87-SM-1. Princeton (NJ): Department of Civil Engineering, Princeton University
  28. Nazmy, A.S. and Abdel-Ghaffar, A.M. (1990), "Non-linear earthquake-response analysis of long-span cablestayed bridges: Applications", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 19, 63-76 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290190107
  29. Nazmy, A.S. and Abdel-Ghaffar, A.M. (1990), "Non-linear earthquake-response analysis of long-span cablestayed bridges: Theory", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 19, 45-62 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290190106
  30. Nazmy, A.S. and Abdel-Ghaffar, A.M. (1992), "Effects of ground motion spatial variability on the response of cable-stayed bridges", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 21, 1-20 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290210101
  31. Perotti, F. (1990), "Structural response to nonstationary multiple-support random excitation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 19, 513-527 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290190404
  32. Soneji, B.B. and Jangid, R.S. (2006), "Effectiveness of seismic isolation for cable-stayed bridges", Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn., 6, 1-20 https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455406001800
  33. Soneji, B.B. and Jangid, R.S. (2006), "Seismic control of cable-stayed bridge using semi-active hybrid system", Bridge Struct., 2, 45-60 https://doi.org/10.1080/15732480600765165
  34. Soneji, B.B. and Jangid, R.S. (2007), "Passive hybrid systems for earthquake protection of cable-stayed bridge", Eng. Struct., 29, 57-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.03.034
  35. Soyluk, K. and Dumanoglu, A.A. (2004), "Spatial variability effects of ground motions on cable-stayed bridges", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 24, 241-250 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2003.11.005
  36. Soyluk, K., Dumanoglu, A.A. and Tuna, M.E. (2004), "Random vibration and deterministic analyses of cablestayed bridges to asynchronous ground motion", Struct. Eng. Mech., 18, 231-246
  37. Tsai, C.S., Chen, W.S., Chiang, T.C. and Chen, B.J. (2006), "Component and shaking table tests for full-scale multiple friction pendulum system", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35, 1653-1675 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.598
  38. Wesolowsky, M.J. and Wilson, J.C. (2003), "Seismic isolation of cable-stayed bridges for near-field ground motions", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32, 2107-2126 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.318
  39. Zayas, V.A., Low, S.S., Mahin, S.A. and Bozzo, L. (1989), "Feasibility and performance studies on improving the earthquake resistance of new existing building using the friction pendulum system", In: Report No. UCB/EERC 89-09. Berkeley (CA): Earthquake Engineering and Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California
  40. Zembaty, Z. and Rutenberg, A. (1998), "On the sensitivity of bridge seismic response with local soil amplification", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 27, 1095-1099 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199810)27:10<1095::AID-EQE772>3.0.CO;2-V
  41. Zerva, A. (1991), "Effect of spatial variability and propagation of seismic ground motions on the response of multiply supported structures", Probabilist. Eng. Mech., 6, 212-221 https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-8920(91)90012-S

Cited by

  1. Investigation of earthquake angle effect on the seismic performance of steel bridges vol.22, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.22.4.855
  2. Pseudo 3D FEM analysis for wave passage effect on the response spectrum of a building built on soft soil layer vol.8, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.5.1241
  3. Multiple-support seismic response of Bosporus Suspension Bridge for various random vibration methods vol.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csse.2016.04.001
  4. Longitudinal Vibration Control of Floating System Bridge Subject to Vehicle Braking Force with Viscous Dampers vol.446-449, pp.1662-8985, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.446-449.1256
  5. Minimum deformability design of high-strength concrete beams in non-seismic regions vol.8, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2011.8.4.445
  6. Site-response effects on RC buildings isolated by triple concave friction pendulum bearings vol.8, pp.6, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2011.8.6.693
  7. Inelastic design of high-axially loaded concrete columns in moderate seismicity regions vol.39, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.39.4.559
  8. Probabilistic study of the influence of ground motion variables on response spectra vol.39, pp.6, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.39.6.877
  9. Concurrent flexural strength and deformability design of high-performance concrete beams vol.40, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.40.4.541
  10. Investigation of effectiveness of double concave friction pendulum bearings vol.9, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2012.9.3.195
  11. Stochastic responses of isolated bridge with triple concave friction pendulum bearing under spatially varying ground motion vol.65, pp.6, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.65.6.771
  12. Stochastic Response of a Coastal Cable-Stayed Bridge Subjected to Multi-Dimensional and Multi-Supported Earthquake and Waves vol.15, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793431121500068