Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management (품질경영학회지)

Korean Society for Quality Management (한국품질경영학회)
권호 표지

The Classification of Logistics Service Quality through the utilization of Kano Model

Kano모형을 이용한 물류서비스품질의 분류

  • Kang, Gi-Du (School of business administration Soongsil University) ;
  • Ahn, Seung-Ho (School of business administration Soongsil University) ;
  • Cheon, Hong-Sik (School of business administration Soongsil University) ;
  • Lee, Woo-Yeong (Graduate school of business Soongsil University)
  • Published : 2009.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The importance of quality logistics service has kept growing in fierce competitions. Accordingly, many have tried to assess the logistics service quality and attempted to propose the strategic ways to manage it. However, it has been known that service quality is a multi-dimensional construct and not all quality attributed are viewed as equally important to customers. In other words, each quality attribute has different implications for customer satisfaction. To this respect, the current study attempted to identify the satisfying/dissatisfying quality factor through the Kana approach. In so doing, several satisfying and dissatisfying quality factors in logistics service quality were identified. Further, several academic and practical implications for logistics service quality were proposed.

Keywords

References

  1. 강기두, 안승호, 채명기 (2007), 물류서비스 품질의 측정을 위한 척도개발에 관한 연구, 품질경영학회지, 제36권, 제 2호, pp. 45-58
  2. 강준모(1999), 신제품의 품질차원 분류와 활용에 관한 연구, 성균관대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  3. 김규정(2003), e-서비스품질 평가의 Kano모형적 접근: 한.미간의 비교분석, 계명대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  4. 김연생, 박영택, 서영호, 유왕진, 유한주, 이동규(2001), 품질경영론, 서울, 박영사
  5. 김연성, 박상찬, 박영택, 서영호, 유한주, 이동규(2004), 품질경영론, 서울, 박영사
  6. 유한주(1995), 품질개념에 대한 이원적 인식방법의 고찰, 품질경영 심포지움 발표논문, pp.61-65
  7. 이경재(2003), 웹사이트 사용자 인터페이스의 품질분석-Kano의 품질인 식 모형의 적용을 중심으로, 전남대학교 대학원 석사논문
  8. 이종철(2001), 제화의 고객지향적 품질창종에 관한 실증적 연구-Kano의 모형과 QFD를 중심으로, 상명대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  9. 임성옥(2004), Kano모델을 기반으로 한 잠재적 고객만족 개선 지수의 개발 및 적용에 관한 연구, 성균관대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문
  10. 하헌구, 구경모(2003), 우리나라 물류산업의 발전방안 연구, 교통개발연구원
  11. Bowersox, D.J., Mentzer, J.T., & Speh, T.W. (1995). Logistics leverage, Journal of Business Strategies, 12(Spring), pp.36-49 https://doi.org/10.1108/eb060097
  12. Harding, F.E. (1995). Business service specifications, for DHL Worldwide Express, Redwood City, CA, pp.7
  13. Janne Huiskonen & Timo Pirttila, (1998), 'Sharpening logistics customer service strategy planning by applying Kano's quality element classification', Internationa Jouranl of Production Economics, 56(57), pp.253-260 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(97)00065-0
  14. Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takashi, F., Tsuji, (1984), Attractive Quality and Must-be Quality, The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Contorol, 14(2). pp.39-48
  15. Maltz, A., & Maltz, E. (1998), Customer Service in The distributor Channel Empirical Findings, Journal of business Logistics, 19(2). pp.103-130
  16. Matzler, K., & Hinterhuber, Hans H. (1998), How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano's model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment, Technovation, 18(1), pp.25-38 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00072-2
  17. Shewhart, W.A. (1931) Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product ASQC: Milwaukee
  18. Timko, M. (1993), An experiment in continuous analysis. In D. Walden(Ed) Kano's method for understanding customer-defined quality, pp. 17-20. MA: Center for Quality of Management, Inc
  19. Walden, D. (1993), Introduction to Kano's methods, In D. Walden(Ed) Kano's method for understanding customer-defined quality, pp. 3-7. MA: Center for Quality of Management, Inc
  20. Zhang, P., & Dran, GM. (2000) Satisfiers and Dissatisfiers: A Two-Factor Model for website Design and Evaluation, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14). pp.1253-1268 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1039>3.0.CO;2-O