DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Numerical Study on the Performance and the Heat Flux of a Coaxial Cylindrical Steam Reformer for Hydrogen Production

수소 생산을 위한 동축원통형 수증기 개질기의 성능 및 열유속에 대한 수치해석 연구

  • Published : 2009.09.01

Abstract

Heat transfer rate is a very important factor for the performance of a steam reformer because a steam reforming reaction is an endothermic reaction. Coaxial cylindrical reactor is the reactor design which can improve the heat transfer rate. Temperature, fuel conversion and heat flux in the coaxial cylindrical steam reformer are studied in this paper using numerical method under various operating conditions. Langmuir-Hinshelwood model and pseudo-homogeneous model are incorporated for the catalytic surface reaction. Dominant chemical reactions are assumed as a Steam Reforming (SR) reaction, a Water-Gas Shift (WGS) reaction, and a Direct Steam Reforming (DSR) reaction. Although coaxial cylindrical steam reformer uses 33% less amount of catalyst than cylindrical steam reformer, its fuel conversion is increased 10 % more and its temperature is also high as about 30 degree. There is no heat transfer limitation near the inlet area at coaxial-type reactor. However, pressure drop of the coaxial cylindrical reactor is 10 times higher than that of cylindrical reactor. Operating parameters of coaxial cylindrical steam reformer are the wall temperature, the inlet temperature, and the Gas Hourly Space Velocity (GHSV). When the wall temperature is high, the temperature and the fuel conversion are increased due to the high heat transfer rate. The fuel conversion rate is increased with the high inlet temperature. However, temperature drop clearly occurs near the inlet area since an endothermic reaction is active due to the high inlet temperature. When GHSV is increased, the fuel conversion is decreased because of the heat transfer limitation and short residence time.

Keywords

References

  1. Park, K.-J. and Bae, J.-M., 2008, 'Performance Behavior by $H_2$ and CO as a Fuel in Intermediate Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (IT-SOFC),” J. KSME-B, Vol. 32, No. 12, pp. 963-969 https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-B.2008.32.12.963
  2. Park, J., Lee, S., Lim, S. and Bae, J., 2008, 'Numerical Study on Correlation Between Operating Parameters and Reforming Efficiency for a Methane Steam Reformer,' J. KSME-B, Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 612-620 https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-B.2008.32.8.636
  3. Lee, S., Bae, J., Lim, S. and Park, J., 2008, 'Improved Configuration of Supported Nickel Catalysts in a Steam Reformer for Effective Hydrogen Production from Methane,' J. Power Source, Vol. 180, No. 1, pp. 506-515 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.01.081
  4. Dybkjaer, I., 1995, 'Tubular Reforming and Autothermal Reforming of Natural Gas . an Overview of Available Processes,' Fuel Process. Technol., Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 85-107 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3820(94)00099-F
  5. Seo, Y.-S., Seo, D.-J., Seo, Y.-T. and Yoon, W.-L., 2006, 'Investigation of the Characteristics of a Compact Steam Reformer Integrated with a Water-Gas Shift Reactor,' J. Power Sources, Vol. 161, No. 2, pp. 1208-1216 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.05.039
  6. Ma, L., Jiang, C., Adesina, A.A., Trimm, D.L. and Wainwright, M.S., 1996, 'Simulation Studies of Autothermal Reactor System for $H_2$ Production from Methanol Steam Reforming,' The Chem. Eng. J., Vol. 62, No. 2, pp. 103-111 https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-0467(95)03058-1
  7. Davieau, D.D. and Erickson, P.A., 2007, 'The Effect of Geometry on Reactor Performance in the Steam- Reformation Process,' Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 32, No. 9, pp. 1192-1200 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.11.029
  8. Kvamsdal H.M., Svendsen H.F., Hertzberg, T. and Olsvik, O., 1999, 'Dynamic Simulation and Optimization of a Catalytic Steam Reformer,' Chem. Eng. Sci., Vol. 54, Vo. 13, pp. 2697-2706 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(98)00329-7
  9. Derkx, O.R. and Dixon, A.G., 1997, 'Effect of the Wall Nusselt Number on the Simulation of Catalytic Fixed Bed Reactor,' Catal. Today, Vol. 35, Vo. 4, pp. 435-442 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(96)00210-6
  10. Choi, Y., Stenger, H.G., 2005, 'Kinetics, Simulation and Optimization of Methanol Steam Reformer for Fuel Cell Application,' J. Power Source, Vol. 142, No. 2, pp. 81-91 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.08.058
  11. Hoang, D.L., Chan, S.H. and Ding, O.L., 2005, 'Kinetic and Modeling Study of Methane Steam Reforming over Sulfide Nickel Catalyst on a Gamma Alumina Support,' Chemical Engineering J., Vol. 112, No. 1, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2005.06.004
  12. Park, J., Lee, S., Lim, S. and Bae, J., 2009, 'Numerical Study on Operating Parameters and Shapes of a Steam Reformer for Hydrogen Production from Methane,' J. KSME_B. Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 60-68 https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-B.2009.33.1.60
  13. Ramkrishna, D. and Arce, P., 1989, 'Can Pseudo- Homogeneous Reactor Models be Valid,' Chem. Eng. Sci., Vol. 44, No. 9, pp. 1949-1966 https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(89)85134-6
  14. Niven, R. K., 2002, 'Physical Insight into the Ergun and Wen and Yu Equations for Fluid Flow in Packed and Fluidized Beds,' J. of Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 527-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00371-2
  15. Hoang, D.L., Chan, S.H. and Ding, O.L., 2005, 'Kinetic and Modeling Study of Methane Steam Reforming over Sulfide Nickel Catalyst on a Gamma Alumina Support,' Chem. Eng. J., Vol. 112, No. 1, pp. 1-11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2005.06.004
  16. Xu, J. and Froment, G. F., 1989, 'Methane Steam Reforming, Methanation and Water-Gas Shift I. Intrinsic Kinetics,' J. of AiChE., Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 88-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690350109
  17. Park, J., Lee, S., Lim, S. and Bae, J., 2009, 'Heat Flux Analysis of a Cylindrical Steam Reformer by a Modified Nusselt Number,' Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 1828-1834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.099

Cited by

  1. Performance Evaluation of a Cylindrical Steam Reformer with Various Thermal Conditions vol.26, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.6110/KJACR.2014.26.6.269