DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Calibration of HSPF Hydrology Parameters Using HSPEXP Model Performance Criteria

HSPEXP 모형평가지표 이용한 HSPF 모형의 수문매개변수 보정

  • 김상민 (경상대학교 지역환경기반공학과) ;
  • 성충현 (서울대학교 농업생명과학연구원) ;
  • 박승우 (서울대학교 조정.지역시스템공학부)
  • Published : 2009.07.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the applicability of the HSPEXP model performance criteria for calibrating hydrologic parameters of HSPF. Baran watershed, located at Whasung city, was selected as a study watershed in this study. Input data for the HSPF model were obtained from the digital elevation map, landuse map, soil map and others. Water flow data from 1996 to 2000 was used for calibration and from 2002 to 2007 was for validation. Using the HSPEXP decision-support software, hydrology parameters were adjusted based on total volume, then low flows, storm flows, and finally seasonal flows. Suggested criteria for each model performance variables were referenced from the previous research. For the calibration period, all the HSPEXP model performance criteria were satisfied while two criteria were slightly violated for the validation period.

Keywords

References

  1. Benham, B. L., K. M. Brannan, S. M. Morris, G. R. Yagow, and R. W. Zeckoski, 2005. Bacteria total maximum daily load development for North River. Richmond: Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. http://www.deq.virginia.gov/tmdl/apptmdls/shenrvr/ northbac.pdf. Accessed 13 March 2008
  2. Bicknell, B. R., J. C. Imhoff, J. L. Kittle, Jr., T. H. Jobes, and A. S. Donigan, Jr., 2001. Hydrological Simulation Program-.Fortran(HSPF): User's manual for release 12, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA
  3. Boyle, D. P., H. V. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian, 2000. Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods. Water Resources Research 36(12): 3663-3674 https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900207
  4. Kim, S. M., and S. W. Park, 2004. Calibration and validation of HSPF model to estimate the pollutants loads from rural small watershed. Journal of Korea Water Resources Association 37(8): 643-651 (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2004.37.8.643
  5. Kim, S. M., B. L. Benham, K. M. Brannan, R. W. Zeckoski, and J. Doherty, 2007. Comparison of hydrologic calibration of HSPF using automatic and manual methods. Water Resources Research 43: W01402 https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR004883
  6. Lumb, A. M., R. B. McCammon, and J. L. Kittle, 1994. Users manual for an EXPert System(HSPEXP) for calibration on the Hydrological Simulation Program- Fortran. Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4168, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA
  7. Madsen, H., 2000. Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives. Journal of Hydrology 235: 276-288 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00279-1
  8. Madsen, H., G. Wilson, and H. C. Ammentorp, 2002. Comparison of different automated strategies for calibration of rainfall-runoff models. Journal of Hydrology 261: 48-59 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00619-9
  9. USEPA, 2000. BASINS technical note 6: Estimating hydrology and hydraulic parameters for HSPF, EPA-823-R-00-012, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C
  10. USGS, 2000. Water Resources Applications Software: HSPF. http://water.usgs.gov/software/hspf.html. Accessed 7 Apr. 2009

Cited by

  1. Evaluation of Applicability and Hydrologic Parameter Calibration for HSPF Model using Expert System for HSPF vol.55, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2013.55.4.013