Journal of the Korean housing association (한국주거학회논문집)

The Korean Housing Association (한국주거학회)
권호 표지

Comparison on the Time series of Housing Viewpoint of University Student

대학생 주거관의 시계열적 비교

  • Published : 2009.08.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The demands of residents can be predicted by analyzing the housing viewpoint of residents. And also, the housing viewpoint can change according to various environmental changes, so it's important for us to understand the trend of change. Therefore, the housing viewpoints of university students who will be subjective residents of houses in future were analyzed by observing change due to trend of time. Target for this study is female university students in 20s. A portion of previously presented material (Korean Home Economics Association 37,1, 67-78) was used as data for 1998 and a questionnaire with 171 female university students was conducted on December 2008 for data for 2008. The following result was drawn from examination of change in the housing viewpoint due to trend of time by comparing the housing viewpoint of university students between 1998 and 2008. First, importance of was decreased and importance of was increased in functions of residence. Second, regardless of the time passage, the most students thought and as their opinions on housing. And also, the most students considered a living room as the most important space inside of a house regardless of the time passage and the level of considering a living room as the most important space was more increased. Third, the level of consideration got higher with time in the selection of houses. , , , , , and had higher level of consideration regardless of time passage. Items of which level of consideration increased with time are , , , , , and , and items of which level of consideration decreased are and . Fourth, it can be understood that the level of satisfaction in housing got higher with time. And it can be said that , , , and were not increased in the level of satisfaction in housing compared with 10 years ago. Fifth, regardless of time passage, the level of satisfaction in housing was lower than the level of consideration in the event of selection of houses. As , , and had lower levels of satisfaction in the event of selection of houses compared with the levels of consideration, they have higher possibility of dissatisfaction in housing.

Keywords

References

  1. 김 린(1977), 아파트의 실태와 아파트주민의 주거의식 및 행태에 관한 연구- 잠실아파트와 반포아파트 사례조사를 주로 하여, 대한지방행정공제회 도시문제
  2. 김대년(1992), 대도시 가족의 주거생활역사에 관한 연구1, 대한건축학회논문집, 8(8), 71-80
  3. 김미희.노세희(2008), 광주.전남지역 대학생의 주거가치와 주거만족도, 한국주거학회논문집, 19(4), 11-20
  4. 김미희.문희정(1997), 주의식과 주민전용 공동공간에 대한 요구, 한국주거학회지, 8(3), 91-98
  5. 김상희(2001), 거주자 참가형 주택개발을 위한 주의식 조사연구-경상남도 창원시와 마산시 거주자를 대상으로, 한국주거학회지, 12(2), 13-23
  6. 김영주(2005), 대도시 저출산가정의 주거현황과 주거의식, 한국가정관리학회지, 23(2), 149-157
  7. 박경옥.김선중.김은덕(2002. 11), 울산시 도심외곽지역 중형아파트 구매예정자의 주택선택행동특성, 한국주거학회, 13, 115-121
  8. 배시화(1999), 아파트 내부공간 개조 세대의 주의식에 관한 비교 연구, -규모 40-55평을 중심으로-, 한국주택학회지, 7(2), 121-137
  9. 송장복.전경배(1987), 단독주택주민의 주거의식 및 생태에 관한 조사연구-서울 경우를 중심으로, 대한건축학회 논문집, 3(4), 55-63
  10. 신성영.조대성(1991), 초고층 아파트의 거주의식에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회 논문집, 7(5), 45-53
  11. 안옥희.윤재웅.배정인(2001), 주거학의 이해, 기문당
  12. 안옥희.정미란.김순경(1999), 대학생의 주거관에 관한 연구, 대한가정학회지, 37(1), 67-78
  13. 윤주현.강미나.박천규(2006), 지역간.계층간 주거서비스 격차 완화방안 연구(II), 시도별 정책방안 모색, 국토연구원, 304
  14. 이동숙.윤충열(2000), 3세대 동거주택에 대한 부모.손자녀세대의 주의식, 한국주거학회지, 11(1), 1-12
  15. 이자영(2006), 모녀의 주거관 세대 전승에 관한 연구, 영남대학교 교육대학원, 석사학위논문
  16. 장경수.김경순(2003), 공동주택 평형별 주부들의 주거관에 관한 조사연구, $20{\sim}50$평형대를 중심으로, 한국실내디자인학회논문집, 38, 116-124
  17. 정미란.안옥희(2001), 한일여대생의 주거관에 관한 비교 연구, 한국주거학회지, 12(4), 163-171
  18. 정승일(1999), 대구시민의 생활주기와 주거의식구조, 국토지리학회 지리학연구, 33(3), 145-154
  19. 조인숙.신화경(2004), 세대간 라이프스타일과 주택선택시 고려요인 비교연구, 한국가정관리학회지, 22(6), 155-164
  20. 통계청, http://www.nso.go.kr