The Structural Relations of leadership Type, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment in Healthcare Organizations

보건의료 조직에서 리더십 유형, 직무만족, 조직몰입 간의 구조적 관계 : 간호 및 행정직을 중심으로

  • Jung, Min-Soo (School of Public Health, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Bo-Hye (Graduate School of Healthcare Management, Korea University) ;
  • Choi, Man-Kyu (Department of Healthcare Management, Korea University)
  • 정민수 (서울대학교 보건대학원) ;
  • 이보혜 (고려대학교 일반대학원 보건과학과 보건행정학) ;
  • 최만규 (고려 대학교 보건행정학과)
  • Published : 2009.09.30

Abstract

Healthcare organizations need mutual cooperation among various medical professionals in order to carry out the performance of their duties spite of haying a strong job specialization and independence based on license. However, spite of the importance of leadership roles, there have not been enough researches dealt with leadership effect under the complex duties' relationship of a healthcare organization. This study suggested a new model by combining characteristics of leadership style, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment using Structural Equation Model (SEM). The data were self-administered questionnaires collected in 2006 from 437 employees (nurses, medical technicians, and administrative staffs) of 5 hospitals located in Seoul. The items of questionnaire were composed as a method of choosing new leadership style based on the Bass's standardized questionnaire on a Iransactionaljtransformational leadership combining the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire-XII (LBDQ-XII) of the Ohio State University and Graen and Uhl-Bien's LMK scale through simulation techniques responding to organizational commitment. As a result, the leadership style increasing employees' self-confidence and having continuous response relationship between managers and employees improved their discretion and empowerment as well as worthwhileness and pride. However, the leadership style emphasizing reward and a sense of duty brought about a bed result that was not able to effectively respond to employees' discretion and empowerment and even weakened their worthwhileness and pride. After all, the leadership style based on vision and change had an effect on organizational commitment but the other one based on reward and a sense of duty seemed to be unsuccessful in organizational commitment. Therefore, the desirable leadership in a healthcare organization should be based on employees' self-confidence and continuous response relationship between managers and employees.

Keywords

References

  1. 강영순, 김희철, 강문실; “LMX와 팔로어십, 그리고 리더십유효성간의 관계”, 인적자원관리연구, 13(1) : 45-63, 2006
  2. 김남선, 원용숙; “지역사회민간단체의 리더십활성화를 통한 사회자본극대화 방안”, 지역사회개발학술지, 12(2) : 69-109, 2002
  3. 김용재; “리더십 스타일이 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구”, 인적자원개발연구, 4(2) : 61-86, 2002
  4. 김종진; “조직혁신을 위한 조직효과성에 리더십이 미치는 영향”, 한국부패학회보, 11(3) : 37-65, 2006
  5. 김태백; “병원종업원의 팀웍과 리더십유형이 조직 유효성에 미치는 영향”, 박사학위논문, 인제대학교 대학원, 2006
  6. 김희경; “간호사의 안간관계, 의사소통, 창의적 행동, 간호서비스가 셀프리더십에 미치는 영향”, 임상간호연구, 31(1) : 25-36, 2007
  7. 김희경, 곽명순; “간호사의 성격유형, 리더십 및 간호서비스, 임상간호연구”, 12(1) : 21-31, 2006
  8. 박재산; “행정인력이 인지하는 조직.직무특성, 임파워먼트, 직무만족 및 조직몰입간의 관련성”, 보건행정학회지, 14(1) : 65-88, 2004 https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2004.14.1.065
  9. 박재산; “병원 CEO 리더십 스타일이 조직구성원의 직무만족과 이직의도에 미치는 영향” 보건행정학회지, 16(3) : 1-18, 2006 https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2006.16.3.001
  10. 박은숙; “변혁적 리더십과 거래적 리더십이 조직성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구”, 석사학위논문, 창원대학교 경영대학원, 1999
  11. 박은식, 이채식, 박덕병, 고정숙; “지역사회리더 리더십역량의 중요-성취도 분석”, 농촌계획, 12(1): 59-66, 2006
  12. 오인수, 서용원; “피그말리온 리더십 행동의 규명 및 측정”, 한국심리학회, 산업 및 조직, 14(2) : 43-71, 2001
  13. 이상호; “경영학계의 주요 리더십이론 및 국내 연구동향: 세 가지의 리더십 관점에서의 검토 및 제안”, 인사관리연구, 24(2) : 1-40, 2001
  14. 이철우; “호텔 조직구성원의 임파워먼트가 직무만족, 조직몰입, 이직의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구”, 박사학위논문, 동아대학교대학원, 2000
  15. 정민수, 조병희, 이성천; “지역사회 자발적 결사체의 연결망과 지역사회역량”, 보건행정학회지, 17(4) : 54-81, 2007 https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2007.17.4.054
  16. 정민수, 정유경, 장사랑, 조병희; “지역사회 기반 참여연구 방법론”, 보건교육건강증진학회지, 25(1) : 83-104, 2008
  17. 정용갑, 하호욱, 손태용; “리더십유형이 병원 조직구성원의 직무만족, 조직몰입 및 이직의도에 미치는 영향”, 병원경영학회지, 8(2) : 24-48, 2003
  18. 최수연, 최재욱, 이준영, 최수미, 유효순, 신의철; “리더십유형이 구성원의 조직몰입과 직무만족에 미치는 영향: 종합병원 의무기록실을 대상으로”, 한국의료QA학회지, 10(2) : 144-153, 2003
  19. 채규옥, 한기수; “리더십에서 임파워먼트가 조직성원에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구”, 인적자원관리연구, 13(3) : 193-213, 2006
  20. 하나선, 최 정; “간호 관리자의 리더십 유형과 직무만족, 조직몰입, 이직의도와의 관계 연구”, 대한간호학회지, 32(6) : 812-822, 2002
  21. 민 순, 김혜숙, “간호사가 지각한 상급자의 변혁적 리더십과 간호성과의 관련성”, 대한경영학회지, 18(2) : 871-885, 2005
  22. Bass, B. M.; "Handbook of leadership : A survey of theory and research," New York, Free Press, 1990
  23. Blake, R. R. and Mouton, J. S.; "The managerial grid. Houston," Gulf Publishing, 1964
  24. Blake R. R and Mouton J. S.; "Management by grid principles or situationalism : which? Group and Organization Studies," 7 : 207-210, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1177/105960118200700207
  25. Dansereau, F. J., Graen, G., and Haga, W. J.; "A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations : A longitudinal investigation of the role making process," Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13 : 46-78, 1975 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(75)90005-7
  26. Dorfman, P. W., Howell, J. P., Cotton, B. G., and Tate, U.; "Leadership within the discontinuous hierarchy structure of the military : Are effective leadership behaviors similar within and across command structure, In Clark, K. E, Clark, M. B., and Campbel, l D. P. Impact of Leadership," Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership, 1992
  27. Fiedler, F. E.; "A theory of leadership effectivenes"s, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967
  28. Fiedler, F. E.; "The contingency model and the dynamics of the leadership process," In L Berkowitz. Ed. Advances in experimental social psychology, New York: Academic Press, 59-112, 1978
  29. Fleishman, E. A.; "The description of supervisory behavior," Personnel Psychology, 1953; 37 : 1-6, 1953 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056314
  30. Graen, G. B, and Scandura, T.; "Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing, Research in Organizational Behavior," 9 : 175-208, 1987
  31. Graen, G. B. and Uhl-Bien, M.; "The tranformation of work group professionals into self-managing and partially self-designing contributors : Toward a theory of leadershipmaking, Journal of Management Systems, 3(3) : 33-48, 1991
  32. Halpin, A. W., and Winer, B. J.; "A factorial study of the leader behavior descriptions. In RM Stogdill and AE Coons. Eds. Leader behavior: Its description and measurement," Columbus : Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University: 39-51, 1957
  33. House, R. J.; "A path-goal theory of leader of leader effectiveness," Administrative Science Quarterly, 16 : 321-339, 1971 https://doi.org/10.2307/2391905
  34. Katz, D, Maccoby, N., and Morse, N.; "Productivity, supervision, and morale among railroad workers," Ann Arbor,MI : Institute for Social Research, 1950
  35. Kim H. and Yuki G.; "Relationships of managerial effectiveness and advancement to self-reported and subordinatereported leadership behaviors from the multiple- linkage model," Monographs in Organizational Behavior and Industrial Relations, 24(a) : 243-264, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90014-4
  36. Kline, R. B.; "Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press, 2005
  37. Mathieu, J. E. and Zajac, D. M.; "A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates and consequences of organizational commitment," Psychological Bulletin, 108 : 171-194, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.171
  38. Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., and Smith, C. A.; "Commitment to organizations and occupations : Extension and test of a three component conceptualization," Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4) : 538-551, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538
  39. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., Fetter, R.; "Transformational Leader Behaviors and Their Effects on Followers' Trust in Leader, Satisfaction, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors," The Leadership Quarlerly, 1(2) : 107-142, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7
  40. Schriesheim, C. A., Cogliser, C. C., and Neider, L. L.; "Is it "trustworthy?" A multi-levels-of-analysis of an Ohio state leadership study with implications for future research," Monographs in Organizational Behavior and Industrial Relations, 24(A) : 3-50, 1998
  41. Stogdill, R. M.; "Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature," Journal of Psychology, 25 : 35-71, 1948 https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1948.9917362
  42. Stogdill, R. M.; "Handbook of leadership : A survey of the literature," New York : Free Press, 1974
  43. Yukl, G. A.; "An evaluative essay on current conceptions of effective leadership," European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8 : 33-48, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1080/135943299398429
  44. Yukl, G. A.; "Leadership in Organizations," 5th eds, Englewood Cliff, NJ : Prentice-Hall, 2002