DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Estimation of Damping Matrices for Dynamic Systems

동적 시스템의 감쇠행렬 추정

  • 이건명 (경상대학교 기계항공공학부, 항공기부품기술연구소) ;
  • 김경주 (경상대학교 대학원 기계공학과) ;
  • 주영호 (두산중공업)
  • Published : 2009.10.20

Abstract

Finite element models of dynamic systems can be updated in two stages. In the first stage, mass and stiffness matrices are updated neglecting damping. In the second stage, a damping matrix is estimated with the mass and stiffness matrices fixed. Methods to estimate a damping matrix for this purpose are proposed in this paper. For a system with proportional damping, a damping matrix is estimated using the modal parameters extracted from the measured responses and the modal matrix calculated from the mass and stiffness matrices from the first stage. For a system with non-proportional damping, a damping matrix is estimated from the impedance matrix which is the inverse of the FRF matrix. Only one low or one column of the FRF matrix is measured, and the remaining FRFs are synthesized to obtain a full FRF matrix. This procedure to obtain a full FRF matrix saves time and effort to measure FRFs.

Keywords

References

  1. Mottershead, J. E. and Friswell, M. I., 1993, “Model Updating in Structural Dynamics : a Survey,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 167, pp. 347-375 https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1993.1340
  2. Friswell, M. I. and Mottershead, J. E., 1995, “Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics,” Kluwer Academic Publishers, Massachusetts
  3. Kim, S. Y. and Lee, D. H., 2006, “Identification of Fractional-derivative-model Parameters of Viscoelastic Materials Using an Optimization Technique,” Transactions of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering, Vol. 16, pp. 1192-1200 https://doi.org/10.5050/KSNVN.2006.16.12.1192
  4. Lin, R. M. and Ewins, D. J., 1994, “Analytical Model Improvement Using Frequency Response Functions,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 8, pp. 437-458 https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.1994.1032
  5. Imregun, M., Visser, W. J. and Ewins, D. J., 1995, “Finite Element Model Updating Using Frequency Response Function Data - I. Theory and Initial Investigation,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 9, pp. 187-202 https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.1995.0015
  6. Lu, Y. and Tu, Z., 2004, “A Two-level Neural Network Approach for Dynamic FE Model Updating Including Damping,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 275, pp. 931-952 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00796-X
  7. Lin, R. M. and Zhu, J., 2006, “Model Updating of Damped Structures Using FRF Data,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 20, pp. 2200-2218 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.05.008
  8. Minas, C. and Inman, D. J., 1988, “Correcting Finite Element Models with Measured Modal Results Using Eigenstructure Assignment Methods,” Proceedings of the 6th International Modal Analysis Conference, pp. 583-587
  9. User's Guide(Version 3), 2004, Optimization Toolbox For Use with MATLAB, The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts
  10. Ewins, D. J, 1995, “Modal Testing : Theory and Practice,” Research Studies Press Ltd., Somerset, chap. 4
  11. Ozgen, G. O. and Kim, J. H., 2009, “Error Analysis and Feasibility Study of Dynamic Stiffness Matrix-based Damping Matrix Identification,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 320, pp. 60-83 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2008.07.021