Effect of Active Gluten Supplementation on the Processing and Quality of Rice Bagel

활성 글루텐 첨가가 쌀베이글의 품질 특성에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Young-Tack (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyungwon University) ;
  • Park, Young-Seo (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyungwon University)
  • 이영택 (경원대학교 식품생물공학과) ;
  • 박영서 (경원대학교 식품생물공학과)
  • Received : 2008.12.05
  • Accepted : 2009.01.22
  • Published : 2009.02.28

Abstract

The effect of active gluten supplementation on the quality properties of rice bagel was investigated. Water hydration capacity of rice flour increased as the amount of gluten increased, whereas alkaline water retention capacity decreased. Pelshenke value and sedimentation value were incerased as the amount of gluten increased, but these values are lower than those of strong wheat flour. Peak viscosity, setback, peak height, and peak width decreased as the amount of gluten increased. When the active gluten of 23% was added to the rice flour, the specific loaf volume of bagel increased more that two times compared with the active gluten of 11%. Hardness, gumminess, and chewiness were decreased as the amount of gluten increased. Specific loaf volume of bagel showed highly positive correlation in water hydration capacity, Pelshenke value, and sedimentation value of which values were r=0.962, r =0.964, and r =0.966, respectively.

활성 글루텐 첨가가 쌀베이글의 품질 특성에 미치는 영향을 조사하였다. 쌀가루에 글루텐 첨가량이 증가함에 따라 보수력은 증가한 반면, 알칼리수 흡수율은 감소하였다. Pelshenke값과 침전가는 글루텐의 첨가량이 증가함에 따라서 유의적으로 증가는 하였으나 강력분의 Pelshenke값과 침전가에는 미치지 못하였다. 최고점도와 setback 및 peak height와 peak width는 글루텐의 첨가량이 증가함에 따라서 감소하는 경향을 보였다. 글루텐을 23% 첨가할 경우 베이글의 부피는 글루텐 11% 첨가 후와 비교할 때 2배 이상 증가하였으며 글루텐의 첨가량이 증가할수록 베이글의 경도, 검성 및 씹힘성은 감소하는 경향을 나타내었다. 베이글의 비용적과 물 흡수력, Pelshenke값 및 침전가와는 고도의 정의 상관(r =0.962, r =0.964, r =0.966)을 나타내었다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 농림부

References

  1. AACC. 2000. Approved Methods of the AACC. 10th ed. American Association of Cereal Chemistry, Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA
  2. Bason ML, Ronalds JA, Weigley CW. 1993. Hubbard LJ.Testing for sprout damage in malting barley using the Rapid Visco- Analyser. Cereal Chem. 70: 269-272
  3. Chang HG, Shin HS, Kim SS. 1984. Relation of physicochemical properties and cookie baking potentialities of Korean wheat flours. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 16: 149-152
  4. Collins JL, Post AR. 1981. Peanut hull flour as a potential source of dietary fiber. J. Food Sci. 46: 445-448 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1981.tb04881.x
  5. Finney KF, Shorgren MD. 1972. A ten-gram mixograph for determining and functional properties of wheat flour. Bakers Dig. 46: 32-36
  6. Kang MY, Choi YH, Choi HC. 1997. Effects of gums, fats and glutens adding on processing and quality of milled rice bread. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 29: 700-704
  7. Kohlwey DE, Kendall JH, Mohindra RB. 1995. Using the physical properties of rice as a guide to formulation. Cereal Food World 40: 728-732
  8. Kum JS. 1998. Effects of amylose content on guality of rice bread. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 30: 590-595
  9. Lee MH. 2009. Effects of food gums, emulsifiers, and enzymes on the quality characteristics of rice breads. Kyungwon University MS thesis
  10. Lee YT. 1994. Formula optimization for rice bread with soy flour substitution. Food Biotechnol. 3: 226-232
  11. Lee YT, Chang HG. 2003. Effects of waxy and normal hull-less barleys flours on bread-making properties. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 35: 918-923
  12. Lee YT, Park YS, Chang HG. 2006. Effect of soy protein concentrate on the properties of white layer cake making. Food Eng. Prog. 10: 107-119
  13. Lent PJ, Grant LA. 2001. Effects of additives and storage temperature on staling properties of bagels. Cereal Chem. c: 619-629 https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM.2001.78.5.619
  14. Lin MJY, Humbert ES, Sosulski FW. 1974. Certain functional properties of sunflower meal products. J. Food Sci. 39: 368-372 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1974.tb02896.x
  15. McConnell AA, Eastwood MA, Mitchel WD. 1974. Physical characteristics of vegetable foodstuffs that could influence bowel function. J. Sci. Food Agric. 25: 1457-1460 https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740251205
  16. Miyauchi KS, Watanabe T. 1978. Modified soybean protein with high water-holding capacity. Cereal Chem. 55: 157-159
  17. Nishita KD, Bean MM. 1979. Physicochemical properties of ricein relation to rice bread. Cereal Chem. 56: 185-189
  18. Nishita KD, Robert RL, Bean MM, Kennedy BM. 1976. Development of a yeast-leavened rice-bread formula. Cereal Chem. 53: 626-635
  19. Quinn JR, Patton D. 1979. A practical measurement of water hydration capacity of protein materials. Cereal Chem. 56: 38-40
  20. Ross AS, Walker CE, Booth RI, Orth RA, Wrigley CW. 1987. The Rapid Visco-Analyzer: A new technique for the estimation of sprout damage. Cereal Food World 32: 827-829
  21. Yamazaki WT. 1953. An alkaline water retention capacity test for the evaluation of cookie baking potentialities of soft winter wheat flour. Cereal Chem. 30: 242-249
  22. You SH, Chang HG, Park YS. 2006. Baking properties of bagel supplemented with rye flour. Food Eng. Prog. 10: 233-241