Volatile Analysis and Preference Measurement of Korean Black Raspberry Wines from Different Regions

주요 산지별 제조 복분자주의 기호도 및 휘발성분 분석

  • Lee, Seung-Joo (Department of Food Service Management, Sejong University) ;
  • Lee, Kwang-Geun (Department of Food Science and Technology, Dongguk University)
  • Received : 2009.10.16
  • Accepted : 2009.11.14
  • Published : 2009.11.30

Abstract

In this study, four Korean black raspberry wines were developed from different regions in Korea; Gochang (G), Heongsung (H), Jeongup (J), and Sungchang (S). Their flavor profiles were determined using a combination of volatile analysis and sensory evaluation. From the volatile analysis of the developed wines, 8 acids, 17 alcohols, 12 esters, 9 terpenes, 3 aldehydes and ketones, and 4 miscellaneous compounds were identified. Preferences of appearance, aroma, full-body, and overall acceptability in the developed wines were determined using 9-point hedonic scale by 43 panelists, compared with one commercial black raspberry wine (Sunw). The sweetness, sourness, astringency levels were also evaluated using 9-point just-about-right (JAR) scale. The mean overall acceptability score of Sunw (5.58) was the highest among the tested wines, followed by G (4.81), S (4.44), H (4.41), and J (4.13) (p<0.05). Sweetness levels in the developed wines were overall lower than JAR level, while sourness and astringency levels were overall higher than JAR level.

국내 주요 복분자 산지인 고창, 정읍, 횡성, 순창산 복분자로 복분자주를 제조하여 제조 복분자주의 휘발성 향기성분 분석과 기호도 조사를 통해 산지별 차이를 파악하였다. 복분자주의 주요 향기성분으로 phenylethyl alcohol, isoamyl alcohol, diethyl succinate, isobutyl alcohol, acetic acid, octanoic acid, benzoic acid, $\alpha$-terpineol, myrtenol, pcymene-8-ol이 동정되었고 특히 적포도주에 비해 terpene류가 많이 검출되어 복분자주의 odor-active compounds를 분석하기 위해 gas-chromatography-olfactometry를 포함한 다양한 향기성분 분석 연구가 필요한 것으로 보인다. Ester류는 횡성산과 정읍산 복분자주에서 많이 검출되었고 alcohol과 acid류도 횡성산에서 가장 많은 농도를 나타내었다. Terpene류는 정읍산에서 가장 높게 나타났다. 차후 이들 시료에 대한 묘사분석을 통해 향기성분과의 상관관계 분석이 필요하리라 여겨진다. 전반적인 기호도에서는 제조복분자주에서 고창, 순창, 횡성, 정읍순으로 나타났고 특히 횡성과 정읍 시료의 경우 단맛은 약하고 신맛은 너무 강한 것으로 나타나 당산비 조절이 필요한 것으로 여겨진다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 농림수산식품부

References

  1. Ahn YH, Kim YH. 2007. Distribution and ecological characteristicsof native Rubus coreanus in Korea. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 21:176-185
  2. Cha HS, Park MS, Park KM. 2006. Physiological activities ofRubus coreanus Miquel. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 33: 409-415
  3. Chung TH, Kim JC. Lee CY. Moon MK. Chae SC, Lee IS. KimSH, Hahn KS, Lee IP. 1997. Potential antiviral effects of Terminalischebula, Sanguisorba officinalis, Rubus coreanus andRheum palmatum against duck hepatitas B virus (DHBV). Phytother.Res. 11:179-182 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1573(199705)11:3<179::AID-PTR50>3.0.CO;2-F
  4. Choi HS, Kim MK, Park HS, Kim YS, Shin DH. 2006. Alcoholicfermentation of Bokbunja (Rubus coreanus Miq.) wine. KoreanJ. Food Sci. Technol. 38: 543-547
  5. Choi HS. Kim MK, Park HS, Shin DH. 2005. Changes in physicochemical characteristics of Bokbunja (Rubus coreanus Miq.)wine during fermentation. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 37: 574-578
  6. Ebeler SE. 2001. Analytical chemistry: Unlocking the secrets ofwine flavor. Food Rev. Inter. 17: 45-64 https://doi.org/10.1081/FRI-100000517
  7. Engel W, Bahr W, Schieberle P. 1999. Solvent assisted flavourevaporation - a new versatile technique for the careful and directisolation of aroma compounds from complex food matrices.Food Res. Technol. 209: 237-241 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002170050486
  8. Fischer U, Roth D, Christmann M. 1999. The impact of geographicorigin, vintage and wine estate and sensory properties ofvitis vinitera cv. Riesling Wine. Food Qual. Pref. 10: 281-288 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(99)00008-7
  9. Gil JM, Sanchez M. 1997. Consumer preferences for wineattributes: a conjoint approach. Brit. Food J. 99: 3-11 https://doi.org/10.1108/00070709710158825
  10. Heyman H, Noble AC. 1987. Descriptive analysis of commercialCabernet sauvignon wines from California. American J. Enol.Vitic. 38: 41-44
  11. Hong JS, Kim IK, Kim MG, Yoon S. 1995. Processing developmentof bokbunja-wine. Agricultural R&D Promotion Center,Seoul, Korea
  12. Korea Alcohol Liquor Industry Association. 2001. Alcohol BeverageNews, March, p.11
  13. Kovats E. 1965. Gas chromatographic characterization of organicsubstances in the retention index system. Adv. Chromato. 1:229-247
  14. Kovats E. 1965. Gas chromatographic characterization of organicsubstances in the retention Lawless HT, Heymann H. 1988. Sensory Evaluation of Food:Principals and Practices. Chapman and Hall, San Francisco,USA, pp. 430-475
  15. Lee MK, Lee HS, Choi GP, Oh DH, Kim JD, Yu CY, Lee HY.2003. Screening of biological activities of the extracts fromRubus coreanum Miq. Korea L. Med. Crop. Sci. 11: 5-12
  16. Lee SJ, Umano K, Shibamoto T, Lee KG. 2005. Identification ofvolatile components in basil (Ocimumbasilicum L.) and thymeleaves (Thymusvulgaris L.)and their antioxidant properties. FoodChem. 91: 131-137 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.05.056
  17. Lee SJ, Lee JE, Kim HW, Kim SS, Koh KH. 2006. Developmentof Korean red wines using Vitis Labrusca varieties: instrumentaland sensory characterization. Food Chem. 94: 385-393 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.11.035
  18. Nykänen L, Suomalainen H, Suomalainen H. 1983. Aroma ofBeer, Wine and Distilled Alcoholic Beverages (Handbook ofAroma Research). Springer, New York, USA
  19. Rapp A. 1998. Volatile flavour of wine: correlation betweeninstrumental analysis and sensory perception. Nahrung 42: 351-363 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-3803(199812)42:06<351::AID-FOOD351>3.3.CO;2-U
  20. Schreier, P. 1979. Flavor composition of wines: a review. CRCCritic. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 12: 59-111 https://doi.org/10.1080/10408397909527273
  21. Shin HJ, Nam HG, Lim IJ, Cha WS. 2006. Comparison of volatilecompounds in Bokbunja (Rubus coreans Miquel) wines withand without mushroom extracts. Korean J. Biotechnol. Bioeng.21: 410-413
  22. Shin TY, Kim SH, Lee ES. Eom DO, Kim HM. 2002. Action ofRubus coreanus extract on systemic and local anaphylaxis. Phytother.Res. 16: 508-513 https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.925