Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploration of Experienced Science Teachers' Personal Practical Knowledge of Teaching Socioscientific Issues (SSI)

  • Received : 2010.03.17
  • Accepted : 2010.05.27
  • Published : 2010.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study explored the accumulated personal practical knowledge of six experienced science teachers in teaching SSI. The guiding research questions were: 1) how did they develop their understanding of SSI and their goals for teaching SSI over many years, and 2) what are the practical issues that the teachers have experienced while addressing SSI in science classrooms. The data source included individual interviews with six science teachers. Each interview lasted 50-70 minutes long and was audio-taped. Data was analyzed based on the methods suggested by Miles and Huberman (1994). Results indicated that, although their motivations for teaching SSI were personal and different, two major categories emerged. One group of teachers was mainly motivated by SSI itself, and the other group was motivated by the teaching aspects that SSI brings. The SSI-oriented group was very sensitive to SSI as it occurs in contemporary society. The teaching-oriented group paid more attention to the educational benefits that addressing SSI could bring to students. Their motivations for teaching SSI influenced how they set up their purposes for teaching, and their purposes for teaching guided them to use appropriate teaching strategies to make their SSI teaching more effective. All of their practical concerns were also connected to their basic motivations for teaching SSI.

Keywords

References

  1. Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (1996). Assessing teachers' practical knowledge. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 22, 275-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-491X(96)00016-8
  2. Carter, K. (1990). Teachers' knowledge and learning to teach. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 291-310). New York: Macmillan.
  3. Cho, H., & Choi, K. (1998). The necessities and current states of science education dealing with socioscientific characteristics of science. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 18(4), 559-570.
  4. Connell, S., Fien, J., Lee, J., Sykes, H., & Yencken, D. (1999). 'If it doesn't directly affect you, you don't think about it': A qualitative study of young people's environmental attitudes in two Australian cities. Environmental Education Research, 5(1), 96-113.
  5. Connelly, E. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience. New York: Teachers College Press.
  6. Cross, R. T., & Price, R. F. (1996). Science teachers' social conscience and the role of controversial issues in the teaching of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 319-333. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199603)33:3<319::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-W
  7. Davis, K. S. (2003). "Change is hard": What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practises. Science Education, 87(1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10037
  8. Dewhurst, D. (1992). The teaching of controversial issues. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 26, 153-163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.1992.tb00277.x
  9. Elbaz, F.(1981). The teacher's practical knowledge: Report of a case study. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 43-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/1179510
  10. Gess-Newsome, J., Southerland, S. A., Johnston, A. & Woodbury, S. (2003). Educational reform, personal practical theories, and dissatisfaction: The anatomy of change in college science teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 731-767. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040003731
  11. Jenkins, E. W. (1992). School science education: Toward a reconstruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(3), 229-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027920240302
  12. Jenkins, E. W. (2002). Linking school science education with action. In W.M. Roth and J. Desautels (Eds.), Science education as/for sociopolitical action (pp.17-34). New York: Peter Lang.
  13. Johnston, S. (1992). Images: A way of understanding the practical knowledge of student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(92)90003-L
  14. Kibble, D. (1998). Moral education dilemmas for the teacher. Curriculum Journal, 9, 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958517970080105
  15. Lee, H., & Chang, H. (2007). The comparison of state-level U.S. science curricula with science teachers' perception regarding teaching socioscientiifc issues(SSI). The Journal of Curriculum & Evaluation, 10(1), 189-209.
  16. Lee, H., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Choi, K. (2006). Korean science teachers' perceptions of the introduction of socioscientific issues into the science curriculum. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 6(2), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150609556691
  17. Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  18. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  19. Ministry of Education. (1992). The 6th Korea National Curriculum Standard. Seoul:Daehan Printing and Publishing Co.
  20. Ministry of Education. (1997). The 7th Korea National Curriculum Standard. Seoul:Daehan Printing and Publishing Co.
  21. Oulton, C., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. M. (2004). Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000072746
  22. Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112 138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
  23. Sadler, T. D., Amirshokoohi, A., Kazempour, M., & Allspaw, K. M. (2006). Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 353-376. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20142
  24. Zeidler, D. L., & Keefer, M. (2003). The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific issues in science education. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning in socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 7-40). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Cited by

  1. Enlargement of Pre-service Science Teachers' Understanding of SSI Teaching through a Teacher Education Program vol.15, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2011.15.4.913
  2. An analysis of changes in gifted, middle school students' decision-making on socioscientific issues in biotechnology vol.17, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2013.17.4.1501
  3. 집단지성 원리를 적용한 과학관련 사회·윤리적 쟁점 수업 모형의 개발 vol.34, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.6.0523
  4. 과학 기술 관련 사회쟁점 교육에 대한 과학 교사들의 SSI-PCK 사례연구 vol.37, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.4.679
  5. 플립러닝 기반 SSI 수업이 중학생의 과학기술 사회 시민으로서의 역량 및 인성 함양에 미치는 효과 vol.38, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.4.467