Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow

Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society (대한견·주관절의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evauation of Injury Mechanism and Clinical Outcome Between Non-Traumatic and Traumatic Type II Slap Lesions

제 2형 SLAP 병변의 외상 유무에 따른 손상 기전 및 치료 결과의 분석

  • Kim, Yong-Ju (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Red-Cross Hospital Seoul) ;
  • Jeong, Hoon (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Red-Cross Hospital Seoul) ;
  • Ha, Jong-Kyoung (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Red-Cross Hospital Seoul) ;
  • Lee, Kwan-Hee (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Red-Cross Hospital Seoul) ;
  • Choi, Sung-Hyun (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Red-Cross Hospital Seoul)
  • 김용주 (서울적십자병원 정형외과) ;
  • 정훈 (서울적십자병원 정형외과) ;
  • 하종경 (서울적십자병원 정형외과) ;
  • 이관희 (서울적십자병원 정형외과) ;
  • 최성현 (서울적십자병원 정형외과)
  • Received : 2010.11.02
  • Accepted : 2010.12.20
  • Published : 2010.12.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Our goal of this study was to compare the mechanism of injury and the clinical outcomes between the non-traumatic and traumatic type II SLAP lesions. Materials and Methods: From January 2007 to May 2009, the sunjects of this study were 27 patients who had undergone operations for isolated type II SLAP lesions. The lesions were classified according to Burkhart's method. The lesions that were located on the anterior-superior labrum were classified as type I, those lesions located on the posterior-superior labrum were classified as type II and those lesions located on the anterior-posterior labrum were classified as type III. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by the UCLA score and the KSS score preoperatively and postoperatively. Results: Of the 27 cases, 16 cases were traumatic and eleven cases were non-traumatic. In the traumatic group, there were 12, 2 and 2 cases of type I, type II and type III, respectively (p=0.013). In non-traumatic group, there were 2, 6 and 3 cases of type I, type II and type III (p=0.026). Anterior lesions were more frequent in the traumatic group and posterior lesions were more frequent in the non-traumatic group. For the clinical outcomes, the mean preoperative UCLA score and KSS score were 18 (range: 14~23) and 48 (range: 32~76), respectively, and the postoperative UCLA score and KSS score were 32 (range: 28~33) and 86 (range: 71~92), respectively, in the traumatic group, and the preoperative UCLA score and KSS score were 21 (18~25) and 58 (41~68), respectively, and the postoperative UCLA score and KSS score were 29 (26~31) and 81 (68~89), respectively in the non-traumatic group. There was no significant statistical difference of clinical outcomes between the two groups (p=0.317, 0.405). Conclusion: In this study, the anatomical feature of type II SLAP lesion was associated with a trauma mechanism. Therefore, a trauma mechanism must be considered when planning the surgical treatment for type II SLAP lesions.

목적: 본 연구는 제 2형 SLAP 병변에서 외상의 유무에 따른 손상기전의 차이 및 임상 결과의 차이를 비교하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법: 2007년 1월부터 2009년 5월까지 제 2형 SLAP 단독 병변으로 수술을 시행한 27예를 대상으로 하였다. 제 2형 SLAP 병변의 분류는 Burkhart에 의한 분류법을 이용하여 병변이 전상방부에 위치하면 제 1형, 후상방부는 제 2형, 전후방 복합 병변은 제 3형으로 분류하였다. 치료 결과는 술 전, 술 후의 UCLA 점수와 KSS 점수를 사용하여 측정하였다. 결과: 총 27예 중 외상군은 16예, 비외상군은 11예였다. 제 2형 SLAP 병변의 형태는 외상군에서 제 1형은 12예, 제 2형은 2예 그리고 제 3형은 2예였다(p=0.013). 비외상군에서는 제 1형 2예, 제 2형 6예, 제 3형 3예였다 (p=0.026). 즉 외상군에서는 전방 병변이 더 많이 발생하였고 (p<0.05), 비외상군에서는 후방 병변이 더 많이 발생한 것으로 추정할 수 있다 (p<0.05). 외상군에서 UCLA 점수 및 KSS 점수는 술 전 평균 18점 (14~23점), 48점 (32~76점)에서 술 후 32점 (28~33), 86점 (71~92점)이었다. 비외상군에서는 UCLA 점수 및 KSS 점수는 술 전 평균 21점 (18~25점), 58점 (41~68점)에서 술 후 29점 (26~31점), 81점 (68~89점)이었다. 임상결과에 있어서 두 군 사이의 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다 (p=0.317, 0.405). 결론: 본 연구에서 제 2형 SLAP 병변의 형태가 외상 기전에 따라 차이가 있음을 관절경 소견을 통해 확인할 수 있었다. 따라서 제 2형 SLAP 병변에 대한 수술적 치료를 고려할 때 외상 유무를 파악하여야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Andrews JR, Carson WG, Mcleod WD: Glenoid labrum tears related to the long head of the biceps. Am J Sports Med, 13: 337-340, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658501300508
  2. Brockmeier SF, Voos JE, Williams RJ III, Altchek DW: Outcomes after arthroscopic repair of type-II SLAP lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 91: 1595-1603, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00205
  3. Burkhart SS, Morgan CD, Kibler WB: Shoulder injuries in overhead athletes. The “dead arm” revisited. Clin Sports Med, 19: 125-158, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-5919(05)70300-8
  4. Cohen DB, Coleman S, Drakos MC, Allen AA: Outcomes of isolated type II SLAP lesions treated with arthroscopic fixation using a bioabsorbable tack. Arthroscopy, 22: 136-142, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2005.11.002
  5. Coleman SH, Cohen DB, Drakos MC: Arthroscopic repair of type II superior labral anterior and posterior lesions with and without acromioplasty: A clinical analysis of 50 patients. Am J Sports Med, 35: 749-753, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506296735
  6. Huber WP, Putz RV: The periarticular fiber system (PAFS) of the shoulder joints. Arthroscopy, 13: 680-691, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-8063(97)90001-3
  7. Kalyan G, Corey G, Rick WW: The outcome of type II SLAP repair: a systematic review. Arthroscopy, 26: 53-545, 2010.
  8. Kim SH, Ha KL, Kim SH, Choi HJ: Results of arthroscopic treatment of superior labral lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 21: 981-985, 2002.
  9. Laurie MK, Stephanie H, Suzanne LM, John CR: Poor outcomes after SALP repair: Descriptive analysis and prognosis. Arthroscopy, 25: 849-855, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2009.02.022
  10. Lee KW, Lee SH, Yang DH, Kam BS, Choy WS: Compariosn of superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions: sports versus non-sports induced injury. J Korean Shoulder Elbow Soc, 10: 175-181, 2007. https://doi.org/10.5397/CiSE.2007.10.2.175
  11. Maffet MW, Gartsman GM, Moseley B: Superior labrum-biceps tendon complex lesions of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med, 84: 93-98, 1995.
  12. Morgan CD, Burkhart SS, Palmeri M, Gilespie M: Type II SLAP lesion: three subtypes and their releationship to superior instability and rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy, 14: 553-565, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-8063(98)70049-0
  13. Park JH, Lee YS, Wang JH, Noh HK, Kim JH: Outcome of the isolated SLAP lesions and analysis of the results according to the injury mechanism. Knee Surg Sports Trumatol Arthrosc, 16: 511-515, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-007-0482-x
  14. Rhee YG, Lee DH, Lim CT: Unstable isolated SLAP lesion. Clinical presentation and outcome of arthroscopic fixation. Arthroscopy, 21: 1099, 2005.
  15. Snyder SJ, Banas MP, Karzel RP: An analysis of 140 injuries to the superior glenoid labrum. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 4: 243-248, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1058-2746(05)80015-1
  16. Yoo JC, Ahn JH, Koh KH, Kim SY: The clinical outcome of arthroscopic repair of isolated type II SLAP lesion in non-athletics. J Korean Arthroscopy soc, 12: 185-190, 2008.

Cited by

  1. A Case Report of Patients with Labrum Tear in Shoulder Treated by Oriental Therapy, Including Sinbaro3 Pharmacopuncture vol.33, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13045/acupunct.2016066