Journal of Environmental Analysis, Health and Toxicology (환경분석과 독성보건)

The Korea Society for Environmental Analysis (한국환경분석학회)
권호 표지

Applications of High Resolution Mass Spectrometer for Simultaneous Measurement of Residual Organophosphorous Pesticides

고분해능 질량분석장치를 이용한 동시분석법 1. 수계의 유기인계 농약-I

  • 최재원 (한국수자원공사 수돗물분석연구센터) ;
  • 김윤석 (한국수자원공사 수돗물분석연구센터)
  • Published : 2010.12.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A gas chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (GC-HRMS) method with solid-phase extraction has been developed for the quantitation of organophosphorous pesticides in surface water. Target compounds in this study were bromacil, cyanazine, dichlorovos (DDVP), metribuzin, phorate, propazine, trifluralin, edifenphos, molinate, iprobenfos (kitazine), diazinon, parathion ethyl, fenitrothion, parathion methyl, simazine and chlorpyrifos. Prior to sample analysis, solid-phase extraction was optimized using RP-1, FL-PR, C18, PESTICIDE, ENVI18 and LRC-SI. The result of the recovery test showed there was no ideal SPE cartridge to produce over 80% recovery. The order of recoveries was RP-1 > PESTICIDE > C18 > ENVI18 > FL-PR > LRC-SI. The use of a 5% acetone in dichloromethane helped to increase the recovery rates for some pesticides. Method detection limits of HRMS using RP-1 ranged from 2.2 to 11 ng/L for all of target compounds. The method was applied to the measurement of organophosphorus pesticide residues in surface water (n=56) from Han River. Major pesticides detected in the samples were iprobenfos (nd~160 ng/L), chlorpyrifos (nd~10 ng/L) and others with the low ranges of ng/L. Higher concentrations for these compounds were observed in sites close to highly populated or agricultural area. The use of HRMS with optimized SPE provides increasing sensitivity of detection for target compounds.

Keywords

References

  1. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/167726-overview (accessed date: 5 September 2010)
  2. ES 10360-10367, 잔류성유기오염물질 공정시험방법, 환경부, 2007, 1734-1878.
  3. Y.S. Kim, H.S. Eun, T. Katase and H. Fujiwara, Chemosphere 2007, 67(3), 456-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.09.063
  4. M. Munawar, I.F. Munawar, D. Sergeant and C. Wenghofer, Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 2000, 3, 249-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1463-4988(00)00024-5
  5. K.S. Kumar, K. Watanabe, H. Takemori, N. Iseki, S. Masunaga and T. Takasuga, Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2005, 48(4), 538-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-004-0030-3
  6. Y. Masuda, K. Haraguchi, S. Kono, H. Tsuji and O. Papke, Chemosphere 2005, 58, 329-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.06.016
  7. M. Oehrne, J. Haugen and M. Schlabach, The Science of the Total Environment 1995, 160/161, 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(95)04352-2
  8. M.B. Woudneh, M. Sekela, T. Tuominen and M. Gledhill, Journal of Chromatography A 2007, 1139, 121-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2006.10.081
  9. M.B. Woudneh and D.R. Oros, Journal of Chromatography A 2006, 1135, 71-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2006.09.017
  10. U.S. EPA Method 1699, Pesticides in Water, Soil, Sediment, Biosolids, and Tissue by HRGC/HRMS, 2007, EPA-821-R-08-001, 1-96.
  11. 최재원, 문부식, 한국환경분석학회지 2008, 11, 55-65.
  12. NIST Mass Spectral Library Search Program, Version 2.0d. (2004).
  13. 최재원, 문부식, 백경희, 한국환경분석학회지 2006, 9, 261-267.