DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on Performances and Carcass Traits in Three Major Meat-Type Duck Strains in Korea

국내 사육되는 육용오리 세 가지 계통의 생산성 및 도체 특성 비교 연구

  • Bang, Han-Tae (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Na, Jae-Cheon (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Choi, Hee-Chul (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Chae, Hyun-Seok (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kang, Hwan-Ku (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Wook (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Min-Ji (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Suh, Ok-Suk (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Park, Sung-Bok (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Choi, Yang-Ho (Department of Animal Science, Division of Applied Life Science, and Institute of Agriculture & Life Sciences, Gyengsang National University)
  • 방한태 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 나재천 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 최희철 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 채현석 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 강환구 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 김동욱 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 김민지 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 서옥석 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 박성복 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 최양호 (경상대학교 축산학과, 대학원 응용생명과학부, 농업생명과학연구원)
  • Received : 2010.11.08
  • Accepted : 2010.12.15
  • Published : 2010.12.31

Abstract

The present experiment was carried out to compare performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality among three major meat-type duck strains in Korea. Two commercial duck (CD) strains, produced from parent stocks (PS) (Cherry Valley and Grimaud), and $F_1$ strains, self-produced by farmers, were used in an 8-week feeding experiment. Both feed conversion ratio and production index were significantly higher in Cherry Valley strain compared with the other two at the ends of 6 and 8 weeks (p<0.05). However, no differences were found in carcass characteristics and meat quality, with the exception of abdominal fat weight where Grimaud were higher than the others. Overall, the results of the current study show that Cherry Valley CD strain had higher performance among three strains tested.

본 연구의 목적은 수입종오리(PS)에서 생산된 육용오리와 농가에서 자가 생산된 육용오리 계통($F_1$)의 생산성과 오리의 도체 성상 및 육질 특성을 비교 연구하는 것이다. 생산성에 있어서 체리밸리, 그리모, $F_1$이 각각 6주령 체중은 3,294 g, 3,248 g, 3,217 g였고, 8주령에는 4,013 g, 3,852 g, 3,922 g으로 체리밸리가 가장 높은 체중을 보였다. 또한 각 계통의 체중 성장의 변화를 볼 때, 그리모는 초기 성장은 빠르나 후기 비육이 떨어지는 경향을 보이며, 이에 반하여 체리밸리와 $F_1$은 나란한 성장을 보이고 있다. 사료 섭취량은 전 기간에 걸쳐 $F_1$ 9,935 g, 그리모 9,872 g, 체리밸리 9,584 g 순으로 높은 경향을 보였다. 사료 요구율은 체리밸리가 6주령에 1.93, 8주령에 2.42로 타 계통에 비해 전반적으로 좋은 성적을 보였다. 생산지수 값에서도 체리밸리가 6주령과 8주령에 각각 405.6, 295.9로 그리모, $F_1$보다 유의적으로 높았다(p<0.05). 도체율은 각 처리간에 유의차는 없었으나 6주령과 8주령의 복강지방 함량은 그리모가 유의적으로 높았다(p<0.05). 부분육의 도체 수율은 전 부위에서 유의차가 없었고, 주령이 증가할수록 다리의 비율은 줄어들고 가슴의 비율은 늘어나는 경향을 보였다. 시험에 사용된 세 계통 간 가슴육의 물리 화학적 특성에서는 각 처리 간에 유의적인 차이는 없었다. 모두 페킨종에서 개량된 계통이지만 육질에 관한 개량은 아직 미진한 것으로 사료된다. 전체적으로, 본 연구의 결과는 국내 환경에서 생산 성적은 체리밸리 계통이 타 계통에 비하여 좋은 경향을 보였으나, 육질에서는 계통 간에 유의적 차이는 없었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn BJ, Jang K, Kim SO, Cho NC, Kook G, Choi BH, Sun SS 2001 Effect of dietary supplements of processed onion on the growth performance and carcass characteristics in duck. Korean J Poult Sci 28:207-213.
  2. Ali MS, Yang HS, Jeong JY, Moon SH, Hwang YH, Park GB, Joo ST 2008 Effect of chilling temperature of carcass on breast meat quality of duck. Poult Sci 87(9):1860-1867. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00194
  3. AOAC 2000 Official Methods of Analysis 17th ed., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, Chapter 39:1-8.
  4. Chae HS, Yoo YM, Ahn CN, Ham JS, Jeong SG, Lee JM, Singh NK 2006 Effect of singeing time on physico-chemical characteristics of duck meat. Korean J Poult Sci 33(4):273- 281.
  5. Chae HS, Yoo YM, Ahn CN, Kim DH, Ham JS, Jeong SG, Lee JM, Choi YI 2005 Effect of rearing period on yeild rate, physical properties and fatty acid composition of duck meats. Korean J Food Sci Ani Resour 25(3):304-309.
  6. Fujimaki JD, Okitani A, Arakawa N 1965 The changes of myosin B during storage of rabbit muscle. I. Physicochemical studies on myosin B. Agr Biol Chem 29:581-588. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb1961.29.581
  7. Grimaud Commercial Duck Management Manual 2005 Grimaud Co.
  8. Kang GH, Jeong, JY, Shawkat A, Kim SH, Jang BG, Kang HS, Lee DS, Lee SJ, Park GB, Joo ST 2006 Effect of storage temperature on meat quality of duck breast. Korean J Food Sci Ani Resour 26(1):43-48.
  9. Kim DP, Nam HG 1977 Studies on the duck meat. J Korean Soc Food Nutr 6(1):61-65.
  10. Kim HJ, Liang CY, Ju MK, Lee KH, Cho SH, Lee, SK 2003 Effects of dietary germanium supplementation on the meat quality of duck. Korean J Food Sci Ani Resour 23(3):200- 208.
  11. Kim JJ 2007 Duck meat production by integration. Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy 34(3):511- 565.
  12. Kook K, Kim EJ, Jung KH, Kim JP, Koh HB, Lee JI, Kim CR, Kim KH 2002 Effect of supplemental bamboo vinegar on production and meat quality of meat type ducks. Korean J Poult Sci 29:293-300.
  13. Laakkonen E, Wellington GH, Skerbon JW 1970 Low temperature longtime heating of bovine. I. Changes in tenderness, water binding capacity, pH and amount of water soluble component. J Food Sci 35:175-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1970.tb12131.x
  14. Lee MH, Park SJ 1997 Distribution of the trace minerals in the wild duck egg. Korean J Sanitation 12(1):9-13.
  15. Livingston DJ, Brown WD 1981 The chemistry of myoglobin and its reaction. Food Technol 35:224-229.
  16. Park BY, Cho SH, Yoo YM, Ko JJ, Kim JH, Chae HS, Ahn JN, Lee JM, Kim YK, Yoon SK 2001 Animal products and processing: Effect of carcass temperature at 3hr post-mortem on pork quality. Korean J Ani Sci Technol 43:949-954.
  17. Pike MM, Ringkob TP, Beekman DD, Koh YO, Gerthoffer WT 1993 Quadratic relationship between early postmortem glycolytic rate and beef tenderness. Meat Sci 34:13-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(93)90015-A
  18. SAS Institute 2001 SAS/STAT User's Guide Release 9.12 Edition SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
  19. SM3 Commercial Duck Management Manual 2004 Cherry Valley Co.
  20. Song YM, Jin SK, Kim IS, Cho YC, Kim HY, Hah KH, Nam KY 2004 Effects of dietary onion supplementation of on the physicochemical properties of duck meat. Korean J Food Sci Ani Resour 24:66-72.

Cited by

  1. Growth Performance, Carcass Yield, and Quality and Chemical Traits of Meat from Commercial Korean Native Ducks with 2-Way Crossbreeding vol.28, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.13.0620
  2. Phylogenetic Analysis using mtDNA D-loop Sequences in Korean Native Ducks vol.41, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2014.41.4.235
  3. Evaluation of Korean Native Ducks on Production Efficiency Factor, Carcass Yield, Partial Meat Ratio and Meat Quality with Weeks vol.40, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2013.40.2.121
  4. The Study on Growth Performance and Uniformity of White Korean Native Ducks vol.43, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2016.43.1.39
  5. Carcass composition and selected meat quality traits of Pekin ducks from genetic resources flocks pp.1525-3171, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez073