Classification of Government Projects and Efficiency Analysis : The Case of Regional Innovation System

정부정책사업의 유형화와 효율적 분석: 지역연고산업진흥사업을 대상으로

Kim, Kwan-Soo;Seo, Myeong-Chon;An, Dong-Hwan
김관수;서명천;안동환

  • Published : 20100400

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the RIS (Regional Innovation System) program and to provide a policy recommendation to improve the efficiency of the program. For a classification purpose, cluster analysis was performed on 110 RIS projects during 2004${\sim}$2008. On the top of cluster analysis, an efficiency analysis was performed by the classification type. The cluster analysis shows that 110 RIS projects can be classified into 5 clusters: (i) a technical development cluster, (ii) a human resources development cluster, (iii) a company supportive cluster, (iv) a networking cluster, and (iv) a non-specified cluster. In order to estimate an efficiency score of each type, a DEA approach was utilized. We found that the mean value of efficiency scores for a technical development cluster and a human resources development cluster was 0.52, 0.56, respectively, whereas the mean value of efficiency scores for a non-specified cluster was 0.39.

Keywords

References

  1. 고정민, 2008. "정책목표에 따른 서비스산업의 분석 및 유형화에 관한 연구", 「산업경제연구」, 21(1): 7-9
  2. 유종영 · 이경미, 2003. 군집분석을 위한 시각화 시스템 구현, 개교 50주년 기년 용인대학교 논문집, 용인대학교
  3. 임정덕 · 강상목 · 백충기, 2006. "지식클러스터 주체로서의 기술관련 대학연구소 및 협력기업 성과분석", 「경제연구」, 24(1): 136-138
  4. 장철영 · 최인규 · 안장자, 2008. "지방정부 농촌지도 사업의 상대적 효율성 평가 - 경상북도 농업기술센터를 중심으로", 「한국지방자치연구」, 10(3): 10-12
  5. 전성해, 2006. " 요인분석을 이용한 최적 군집화", 「청주대학교 산업과학연구」, 23(2)
  6. 조용준 · 김영화, 2007. "요인분석과 군집분석을 통한 세분화 및 전략방향 제시", 「응용통계연구」, 20(1): 25-26
  7. Chames, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, 1978. "Measuring Efficiency of Decision Making Units," European Journal of Operational Research, 2: 429-444 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  8. F\ddot{a}re, R., S. Grosskopf, M. Norris and Z. Zang, 1994. "Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Changes in Industrialized Countries," American Economic Review, 84: 66-83