Evaluation of PCR inhibitory effect of enrichment broths and comparison of DNA extraction methods for detection of Salmonella Enteritidis using real-time PCR assay

Hyeon, Ji-Yeon;Hwang, In-Gyun;Kwak, Hyo-Sun;Park, Chan-kyu;Choi, In-Soo;Seo, Kun-Ho

  • Published : 20100000

Abstract

The best enrichment broth and DNA extraction scheme was determined for rapid and sensitive detection of Salmonella Enteritidis in steamed pork using real-time PCR. The inhibitory effect of commonly used Salmonella enrichment broths, Rappaport-Vassiliadis (RV) and Muller-Kauffmann tetrathionate with novobiocin (MKTTn), on real-time PCR was confirmed. The inhibition of PCR was statistically significant (p < 0.05) in RV and MKTTn, as compared with buffered peptone water (BPW) or phosphate-buffered saline. The inhibitory effect of the selective enrichment media was successfully removed by using a modified DNA extraction, PrepMan Ultra Reagent with an additional washing step or the DNeasy Tissue Kit. In three experiments, when applied to detection of Salmonella Enteritidis in steamed pork, the real-time PCR coupled with single 24 h enrichment with BPW performed better than double 48 h enrichment with BPW plus RV or MKTTn. The simple real-time PCR assay using BPW proved to be a rapid and sensitive test for detection of low concentrations of Salmonella Enteritidis in steamed pork samples as compared with the conventional culture method.

Keywords

References

  1. Al-Soud WA, Ouis IS, Li DQ, Ljungh S, Wadstrom T. Characterization of the PCR inhibitory effect of bile to optimize real-time PCR detection of Helicobacter species. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2005, 44, 177-182 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsim.2004.12.004
  2. Bansal NS, Gray V, McDonell F. Validated PCR assay for the routine detection of Salmonella in food. J Food Prot 2006, 69, 282-287 https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-69.2.282
  3. Catarame TMG, O'Hanlon KA, McDowell DA, Blair IS, Duffy G. Comparison of a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay with a culture method for the detection of Salmonella in retail meat samples. J Food Saf 2006, 26, 1-15 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4565.2005.00025.x
  4. Culp SJ, Beland FA, Heflich RH, Benson RW, Blankenship LR, Webb PJ, Mellick PW, Trotter RW, Shelton SD, Greenlees KJ, Manjanatha MG. Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity in relation to DNA adduct formation in rats fed leucomalachite green. Mutat Res 2002, 506-507, 55-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0027-5107(02)00152-5
  5. Heller LC, Davis CR, Peak KK, Wingfield D, Cannons AC, Amuso PT, Cattani J. Comparison of methods for DNA isolation from food samples for detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli by real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003, 69, 1844-1846 https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.3.1844-1846.2003
  6. Hughes D, Dailianis AE, Hill L, Curiale MS, Gangar V. Salmonella in foods: new enrichment procedure for TECRA Salmonella Visual Immunoassay using a single rv(R10) only, TT only, or dual rv(R10) and TT selective enrichment broths (AOAC official method 998.09): collaborative study. J AOAC Int 2003, 86, 775-790
  7. Maher N, Dillon HK, Vermund SH, Unnasch TR. Magnetic bead capture eliminates PCR inhibitors in samples collected from the airborne environment, permitting detection of Pneumocystis carinii DNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001, 67, 449-452 https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.1.449-452.2001
  8. Malorny B, Hoorfar J. Toward standardization of diagnostic PCR testing of fecal samples: lessons from the detection of Salmonellae in pigs. J Clin Microbiol 2005, 43, 3033-3037 https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.43.7.3033-3037.2005
  9. Malorny B, Paccassoni E, Fach P, Bunge C, Martin A, Helmuth R. Diagnostic real-time PCR for detection of Salmonella in food. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004, 70, 7046-7052 https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.12.7046-7052.2004
  10. Monteiro L, Bonnemaison D, Vekris A, Petry KG, Bonnet J, Vidal R, Cabrita J, Megraud F. Complex polysaccharides as PCR inhibitors in feces: Helicobacter pylori model. J Clin Microbiol 1997, 35, 995-998
  11. Myint MS, Johnson YJ, Tablante NL, Heckert RA. The effect of pre-enrichment protocol on the sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection of naturally contaminated Salmonella in raw poultry compared to conventional culture. Food Microbiol 2006, 23, 599-604 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2005.09.002
  12. Oliveira SD, Rodenbusch CR, Ce MC, Rocha SL, Canal CW. Evaluation of selective and non-selective enrichment PCR procedures for Salmonella detection. Lett Appl Microbiol 2003, 36, 217-221 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765X.2003.01294.x
  13. Rodriguez-Lazaro D, D'Agostino M, Pla M, Cook N. Construction strategy for an internal amplification control for real-time diagnostic assays using nucleic Acid sequencebased amplification: development and clinical application. J Clin Microbiol 2004, 42, 5832-5836 https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.12.5832-5836.2004
  14. Rossen L, Norskov P, Holmstrom K, Rasmussen OF. Inhibition of PCR by components of food samples, microbial diagnostic assays and DNA-extraction solutions. Int J Food Microbiol 1992, 17, 37-45 https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1605(92)90017-W
  15. Uyttendaele M, Vanwildemeersch K, Debevere J. Evaluation of real-time PCR vs automated ELISA and a conventional culture method using a semi-solid medium for detection of Salmonella. Lett Appl Microbiol 2003, 37, 386-391 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765X.2003.01415.x
  16. Uyttendaele MR, Debevere JM, Lips RM, Neyts KD. Prevalence of Salmonella in poultry carcasses and their products in Belgium. Int J Food Microbiol 1998, 40, 1-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(98)00012-9
  17. Wiedbrauk DL, Werner JC, Drevon AM. Inhibition of PCR by aqueous and vitreous fluids. J Clin Microbiol 1995, 33, 2643-2646
  18. Wilde J, Eiden J, Yolken R. Removal of inhibitory substances from human fecal specimens for detection of group A rotaviruses by reverse transcriptase and polymerase chain reactions. J Clin Microbiol 1990, 28, 1300-1307
  19. Wilson IG. Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol 1997, 63, 3741-3751