DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reduction Effect of Airborne Pollutants in Pig Building by Air Cleaner Operated with Plasma Ion

플라즈마 이온 방식의 공기정화기를 이용한 돈사내 공기오염물질 저감 효과

  • 김윤신 (한양대학교 환경 및 산업의학연구소) ;
  • 김기연 (한양대학교 환경 및 산업의학연구소) ;
  • 조만수 (한양대학교 환경 및 산업의학연구소) ;
  • 고문석 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 제주출장소) ;
  • 고한종 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 제주출장소) ;
  • 정진원 ((주)이앤에치테크) ;
  • 오미석 ((주)이앤에치테크) ;
  • 윤백 (삼성전자) ;
  • 김중호 (삼성전자)
  • Received : 2010.04.17
  • Accepted : 2010.08.13
  • Published : 2010.08.30

Abstract

This field study was performed to evaluate the efficiency of a plasma ion-operated air cleaner in temporal reduction of airborne pollutants emitted from a pig housing facility. In the case of gaseous pollutants, the plasma ion air cleaner was not effective in reducing levels of ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, nitrogen dioxide, or sulfur dioxide (p>0.05). In the case of particulate pollutants, however, the air cleaner was effective in reducing levels of particulate matter ($PM_{2.5}$ and $PM_1$) by 79(${\pm}6.1$) and 78(${\pm}3.0$)%, respectively. Unlike the case of these fine particle fractions, the reduction of total suspended particles (TSP) and $PM_{10}$ following treatment was almost negligible. In the case of biological pollutants, the mean reduction efficiencies for airborne bacteria and fungi were relatively low at 22(${\pm}6.6$) and 25(${\pm}8.7$)%, respectively. Taken together, these results indicate that in terms of air pollutants released from this pig housing facility, the plasma ion air cleaner was primarily effective in reducing levels of $PM_{2.5}$ and $PM_1$.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, K. Y., Ko, H. J., Lee, K. J., Park, J. B. and Kim, C. N. : Temporal and spatial distribution of aerial contaminants in an enclosed pig building in winter. Environmental Research, 99, 150-157, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2004.10.004
  2. Hospido, A. and Sonesson, U. : The environmental impact of mastitis: a case study of dairy herds. Science of the Total Environment, 343, 71-82, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.10.006
  3. Mayer, D., Reiczigel, J. and Rubel, F. : A lagrangian particle model to predict the airborne spread of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Atmospheric Environment, 42, 466-479, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.069
  4. Demmers, T. G. M., Wathes, C. M., Richards, P. A., Teer, N., Taylor, L. L., Bland, V., Goodman, J., Armstrong, D., Chennells, D., Done, S. H. and Hartung, J. : A facility for controlled exposure of pigs to airborne dusts and gases. Biosystems Engineering, 84, 217-230, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1537-5110(02)00243-X
  5. Hayes, E. T., Curran, T. P. and Dodd, V. A. : Odour and ammonia emissions from intensive pig units in Ireland. Bioresource Technology, 97, 940-948, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.04.023
  6. Chang, C. W., Chung, H., Huang, C. F. and Su, H. J. J. : Exposure assessment to airborne endotoxin, dust, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide in open style swine houses. Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 45, 457-465, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/45.6.457
  7. North Carolina State University : Biofilter for removing odorous compounds in exhaust from swine buildings. Animal and Poultry Waste Management Research: A Progress Report, July 15, 1997.
  8. Keener, K. M., Bottcher, R. W., Munilla, R. D., Parbst, K E. and Van Wicklen, G. L. : Field evaluation of an indoor ozonation system for odor control. In: Proceedings 1999 animal waste management symposium, Jan. 27-28. APWMC. North Carolina State University. Raleigh, NC, pp. 310-313, 1999.
  9. Varel, V. H. and Miller, D. N. : Plant-derived oils reduce pathogens and gaseous emissions from stored cattle waste. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 128, 1366-1370, 2001.
  10. Ni, J. Q., Heber, A. J., Diehl, C. A. and Lim, T. T. : Ammonia, hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide release from pig manure in under-floor deep pits. Journal of Agricultural and Engineering Research, 77, 53-66, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.2000.0561
  11. Kowalski, W. J., Bahnfleth, W. P. and Whittam, T. S. : Bacterial effects of high airborne ozone concnetrations on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Ozone Science and Engineering, 20, 205-221, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1080/01919519808547272
  12. Maness, P. C., Smolinski, S., Blake, D. M., Huang, Z., Wolfrum, E. J. and Jacoby, W. A. : Bactericidal activity of photocatalytic $TiO_{2}$ reaction: toward an understanding of its killing mechanism. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65, 4094-4098, 1999.
  13. Lin, C. Y. and Li, C. S. : Control effectiveness of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation on bioaerosols. Aerosol Science and Technology, 36, 474-478, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1080/027868202753571296
  14. Thomas, C. W., Tung, J. L., Niu, J. and Hung, B. K. : Determination of ozone emission from a domestic air cleaner and decay parameters using environmental chamber tests. Indoor and Built Environment, 14, 29-37, 2005.
  15. Grinshpun, S. A., Adhikari, A., Honda, T., Kim, K. Y., Toivola, M., Rao, K. S. R. and Reponen, T. : Control of aerosol contaminants in indoor air: combining the particle concentration reduction with microbial inactivation. Environmental Science and Technology, 41, 606-612, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1021/es061373o
  16. Curtis, S. E., Anderson, C. R., Simon, J., Jensen, A. H., Day, D. L. and Kelley, K. W. : Effects of aerial ammonia, hydrogen sulfide and swine-house dust on rate of gain and respiratory-tract structure in swine. Journal of Animal Science, 41, 735-739, 1975.
  17. Kim, K. Y., Kim, C. N., Kim, Y. S., Roh, Y. M. and Lee, C. M. : Efficiency of the hybrid-type air purifier on reducing physical and biological aerosol. Korean Journal of Environmental Health Sciences, 32, 478-484, 2006.
  18. Adhikari, A., Reponen, T., Grinshpun, S. A., Martuzevicius, D. and LeMasters, G. : Correlation of ambient inhalable bioaerosols with particulate matter and ozone: A two-year study. Environmental Pollution, 140, 16-28, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2005.07.004
  19. Gomiscek, B., Hauck, H., Stopper, S. and Preining, O. : Spatial and temporal variations of $PM_{1}$, $PM_{2.5}$, $PM_{10}$ and particle number concentration during the AUPHEP-project. Atmospheric Environment, 38, 3917-3934, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.056