Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics (한국항공운항학회지)

The Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics (한국항공운항학회)
권호 표지

A Study on application limitation of AHP priority vector with Expert measurement

전문가 설문에 의한 AHP 가중치 산출의 적용한계에 관한 연구

  • 김웅이 (한서대학교 항공교통학과) ;
  • 김도현 (한서대학교 항공교통학과) ;
  • 최연철 (한서대학교 헬리콥터조종학과)
  • Received : 2010.08.23
  • Accepted : 2010.09.10
  • Published : 2010.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The AHP methodology compares criteria, or alternatives with respect to a criterion, in a natural, pairwise mode. AHP has been applied in a wide variety of applications multi objective decision making being just one. If a group of expert with different aspect, they need some way to revise expert group. We proposed the concatenation of expert to survey the AHP pairwise question for multi-attribute decision making. In this paper, we suggest a way to revise the expert's priorities in hierarch using concept of different group opinion.

Keywords

References

  1. 계층분석적 의사결정, 조근대 외 2인, 동현출판사
  2. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Exposition, Ernest H. Forman and Saul I. Gass Operations Research, Vol. 49, No. 4 (Jul. - Aug., 2001), pp. 469-486 https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.49.4.469.11231
  3. Belton, V., "A Comparison of the Analytic Hierarch Process and a Simple Multi-Attribute Value Function", European Journal of operations Research, Vol. 26, 1986, pp. 7-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90155-4
  4. Belton, V. and Gear, T., "On a short coming of Saaty's Method of Analytic Hierarchies" OMEGA, Vol. 11, No.3, 1983, pp. 228-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(83)90047-6
  5. 황규승, "AHP 기법의 신뢰성에 관한 연구, 고려대경영논총, 32, 1989, pp. 83-97.
  6. 조근태, "기술대안의 전략적 평가를 위한 AHP 적용에 있어서 평가자 신뢰성을 고려한 가중치 통합" 경영과학, 19(2), 2002, PP. 139-153
  7. 윤재곤, "AHP 기법의 적용과 한계점에 관한 연구" 한국경영과학회지, 21(3), 1996, pp 109-125
  8. 김성철, 전문가 설문결과에 의한 AHP 가중치 산출", 국방학술논총, 8, 1994, pp. 41-51