The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A comparative study on the accuracy of impression body according to the types of impression tray

임플란트 인상 채득 시 트레이 종류에 따른 인상체의 정확도에 관한 비교 연구

  • Yi, Hyun-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Lim, Jong-Hwa (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Lee, Joon-Seok (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 이현정 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 임종화 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이준석 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Published : 2010.01.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the accuracy of impression body taking by the closed and the open tray impression technique with 3 types of impression tray. Individual tray, metal stock tray and polycarbonate tray were used. Materials and methods: Nine closed tray impressions were taken by individual tray, metal stock tray and polycarbonate stock tray, respectively with polyether impression material. 9 open tray impressions were also acquired by same manner. Precision analysis on the master models was performed by attaching the reference frameworks with alternate single screws and measuring the vertical fit discrepancy of respective analogues in working cast with a stereo microscope. Data were analyzed by 1 way ANOVA and independent t-test. Results: The average fit accuracy of impression bodies was calculated. With the closed tray impression technique, there were significant statistical differences in vertical fit discrepancy according to the types of tray. The individual tray group showed the lowest value and the polycarbonate stock tray group represented the highest. With the open tray impression technique, there was no significant difference in vertical fit discrepancy. Significant statistical difference in vertical fit discrepancy was found between the open and the closed impression technique with the polycarbonate stock tray. Conclusion: From the results above, more precise impressions could be acquired by the rigid individual tray compared with the polycarbonate stock tray. It was hard to get consistent accuracy impressions by the closed tray impression technique with polycarbonate stock trays.

연구 목적: 보편화된 임플란트 치료의 장기적인 성공을 위해서는 임플란트와 상부 보철물의 연결 시 완전한 수동적 적합을 이루는 것이 중요하며, 이를 위해서는 정확하게 인상 채득하는 것이 필요하다. 이 연구에서는 임플란트 고정체 수준 인상 채득 방법 중 인상체 제거 후 인상용 코핑이 인상체에 남아있는 open tray 인상법과 구강 내에 남아있는 closed tray 인상법, 그리고 인상 채득 시 사용될 수 있는 여러 트레이에 대해 비교 연구해 보고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 실험 모형은 하악 악궁 형태로 열중합형 아크릴릭 레진을 이용하여 제작하였고, vertical gap을 관찰할 20 mm 간격의 기준 구조물을 제작한 후 이를 이용하여 실험 모형에 임플란트 유사체를 매몰하였다. 실험군은 트레이 레진으로 제작한 개인 트레이, 폴리카보네이트 기성 트레이 그리고 금속 기성 트레이 등의 3가지 트레이를 이용하였고, closed tray 인상법과 open tray 인상법의 2가지 인상 채득법에 따라 5개 군으로 나누었다. 그리고 위치에 따른 오차를 관찰하기 위해 시편 모형을 전치부, 구치부로 다시 나누어 총 10개의 실험군을 구성하였다. 1군당 총 9개의 시편을 제작하였고, 시편에 기준 구조물을 한 쪽 지대주만 20 Ncm으로 고정시킨 후 관찰하는 1-screw test를 이용하여 반대쪽의 임플란트 유사체와 지대주와의 gap을 입체 광학 현미경을 이용하여 관찰하였다. 1시편당총6부위를 측정하였고, 3회씩 측정하여 동일한 결과를 얻었을 때 수치를 기록하여 통계 처리하였다. 결과: Closed tray 인상법 사용 시 폴리카보네이트 기성 트레이와 개인 트레이 간에 유의한 차이를 보였지만, open tray 인상법 사용 시 폴리카보네이트 기성 트레이와 개인 트레이 간에 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 폴리카보네이트 기성 트레이를 이용한 인상 채득 시 open tray 인상법과 closed tray 인상법 간에 유의한 차이를 보였고 (P<.05), 폴리카보네이트 트레이를 이용한 closed tray 인상법을 개인 트레이를 이용한 open tray 인상법과 비교 시 전치부, 구치부 모두에서 유의한 차이를 보였다 (P<.05). 결론: 폴리카보네이트 기성 트레이를 사용 시에는 open tray 인상법이 더 추천되는 바이며, 생체 외 실험의 한계성에 유의해야 하며, 정확한 임플란트 고정체 수준 인상 채득에 대해 더 많은 연구가 필요하다고 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  2. Phillips KM, Nicholls JI, Ma T, Rubenstein J. The accuracy of three implant impression technique. A three dimensional analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 1994;9:533-40.
  3. Humphries RM, Yaman P, Bloem TJ. The accuracy of implant master casts constructed from transfer impressions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:331-6.
  4. Rangert B, Jemt T, Jorneus L. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:241-7.
  5. Naconecy MM, Teixeira ER, Shinkai RS, Frasca LC, Cervieri A. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:192-8.
  6. Sones AD. Complications with osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:581-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90084-X
  7. Leonhardt A, Renvert S, Dahlen G. Microbial findings at failing implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:339-45. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100501.x
  8. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:843-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90361-X
  9. Nissan J, Barnea E, Krauze E, Assif D. Impression technique for partially edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:103-4. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.127640
  10. Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:448-55.
  11. Rodney J, Johansen R, Harris W. Dimensional accuracy of two implant impression copings. J Dent Res 1991;70:385(abstract no. 953).
  12. Burton JF, Hood JA, Plunkett DJ, Johnson SS. The effects of disposable and custom-made impression trays on the accuracy of impressions. J Dent 1989;17:121-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(89)90104-8
  13. Bomberg TJ, Hatch RA, Hoffman W Jr. Impression material thickness in stock and custom trays. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:170-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90278-1
  14. Ryu SI, Chang IT, Kim KN. The influence of impression trays on the accuracy of the stone casts poured from complete-arch impressions. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1992;30:1-14.
  15. Cho GC, Chee WW. Distortion of disposable plastic stock trays when used with putty vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:354-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.07.020
  16. Reisbick MH, Matyas J. The accuracy of highly filled elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1975;33:67-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(75)80148-X
  17. Binon PP. The effect of implant/abutment hexagonal misfit on screw joint stability. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:149-60.
  18. Waskewicz GA, Ostrowski JS, Parks VJ. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution transmitted from a fixed prosthesis attached to osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:405-11.
  19. Inturregui JA, Aquilino SA, Ryther JS, Lund PS. Evaluation of three impression techniques for osseointegrated oral implants. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:503-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90160-P
  20. Burawi G, Houston F, Byrne D, Claffey N. A comparison of the dimensional accuracy of the splinted and unsplinted impression techniques for the Bone-Lock implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:68-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70209-9
  21. Spector MR, Donovan TE, Nicholls JI. An evaluation of impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:444-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90235-5
  22. Lee H, So JS, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C. The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:285-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60208-5
  23. Wee AG. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:323-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70136-3
  24. Liou AD, Nicholls JI, Yuodelis RA, Brudvik JS. Accuracy of replacing three tapered transfer impression copings in two elastomeric impression materials. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:377-83.
  25. Cho GC, Chee WW. Distortion of disposable plastic stock trays when used with putty vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:354-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.07.020
  26. Masri R, Driscoll CF, Burkhardt J, Von Fraunhofer A, Romberg E. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs. J Prosthodont 2002;11:155-60. https://doi.org/10.1053/jopr.2002.128004
  27. Phillips RW. Skinner's Science of Dental Materials. 8th ed., WB Saunders Co., Philadelphia, 1982:137-156, 177-215.
  28. Eames WB, Sieweke JC, Wallace SW, Rogers LB. Elastomeric impression materials: effect of bulk on accuracy. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:304-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90013-1
  29. Johnson GH, Craig RG. Accuracy of addition silicones as a function of technique. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:197-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90342-2
  30. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:7-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70229-5

Cited by

  1. 치과용 경석고의 사용방법에 따른 경화팽창과 표면상태 비교연구 vol.38, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2016.38.4.263