Performance of R1234yf and R1234yf/R134a Mixture under Mobile Air-conditioner Operating Conditions

R1234yf와 R1234yf/R134a의 자동차 에어컨 작동 조건에서의 성능 평가

  • Park, Ki-Jung (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Lee, Yo-Han (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Choe, Dae-Seong (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Jung, Dong-Soo (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Inha University)
  • Received : 2010.08.06
  • Accepted : 2010.09.20
  • Published : 2010.12.10

Abstract

In this study, performance of R1234yf and R1234yf/R134a mixture is measured on a heat pump bench tester in an attempt to substitute R134a used widely in mobile air conditioners (MACs). The bench tester is equipped with a open type compressor providing a nominal capacity of 3.5 kW. All tests are conducted under the summer cooling and winter heating conditions of 7/4 $5^{\circ}C$ and $-7/41^{\circ}C$ in the evaporator and condenser, respectively. For R1234yf/R134a mixture, measurements are made at 5%, 10%, and 15% of R134a by mass. Test results show that the coefficient of performance (COP) and capacity of R1234yf are up to 2.7% and 4.0% lower than those of R134a, respectively. For R1234yf/R134a mixture, the COP and capacity are up to 3.9% lower and 3.6% higher than those of R134a. For R1234yf and R1234yf/R134a mixture, the compressor discharge temperature is $4.1{\sim}6.7^{\circ}C$ lower than that of R134a while the amount of charge is reduced up to 11% as compared to R134a. 90%R1234yf/10%R134a is a better refrigerant than pure R1234yf in that it is less flammable and more compatible with existing R134a system. Based upon the results, it is concluded that R1234yf and R1234yf/R134a mixture are long term environmentally friendly solutions to mobile air-conditioners due to their excellent environmental properties with acceptable performance.

Keywords

References

  1. Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer, 1989, Final Act, United Nations Environment Programme.
  2. Jetter, J., 1996, Evaluation of Alternatives for HFC-134a Refrigerant in Motor Vehicle Air Conditioning, Proceedings of the International Conference on Ozone Protection Technologies, Washington, D. C., USA, pp. 845-854.
  3. Global Environmental Change Report, 1997, A Brief Analysis of the Kyoto Protocol, Vol. IX, No. 24, December.
  4. Nielsen, O. J., Javadi, M. S., Sulbaek Andersen, M. P., Hurley, M. D., Wallington, T. J. and Singh, R., 2007, Atmospheric chemistry of $CF_3CF$= $CH_2$:Kinetics and mechanisms of gas-phase reactions with Cl atoms, OH radicals, and $O_3$, Chemical Physics Letters, Vol. 439, pp. 18-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2007.03.053
  5. Minor, B. and Spatz, M., 2008, HFO-1234yf low GWP refrigerant update, Proceedings of International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference at Purdue, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA, 2349.
  6. Zilio, C., Brown, J. S. and Cavallini, A., 2009, Simulation of R-1234yf performance in a typical automotive system, 3rd IIR Conference on Thermophysical Properties and Transfer Processes of Refrigerants, Boulder, CO, USA, IIR- 1280.
  7. Mulroy, W., Kauffeld, M., McLinden, M. O. and Didion, D. A., 1988, Experimental evaluation of two refrigerant mixtures in a breadboard air conditioner, Proceedings of Int. Inst. Refrigeration, Purdue Conference on CFCs, Commissions B1, B2, E1 and E2, pp. 27-34.
  8. Kline, S. J. and McClintock, F. A., 1953, Describing Uncertainties in Single Sample Experiments, Mechanical Engineering Vol. 75, pp. 3-8.
  9. Lemmon, E. W., Huber, M. L. and McLinden, M. O., 2007, NIST Reference Fluid Thermodynamics and Transport Properties, REFPROP version 8.0.
  10. Park, K. J., Woo, S. G. and Jung, D., 2007, Lower flammability limits of flammable refrigerants according to ASTM E681-04 standard, Korea Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 10, pp. 726-734.