Technical efficiency of the coastal composite fishery in Korea: a comparison of data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis

  • Kim, Do-Hoon (Technology Management Center, National Fisheries Research & Development Institute) ;
  • Seo, Ju-Nam (Technology Management Center, National Fisheries Research & Development Institute) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Go (Faculty of Marine Business and Economics, Pukyong National University)
  • Received : 2010.11.30
  • Accepted : 2010.12.15
  • Published : 2010.12.31

Abstract

This study estimated the technical efficiency of coastal composite fishery in Korea by using the data envelopment analysis (DEA) and the stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) methods, and the results on the respective method were compared. In the DEA method, the constant returns to scale (CRS) and the variable returns to scale (VRS) output-oriented DEA models were separated and technical efficiencies were estimated, respectively. The average estimated value of technical efficiency by the SFA method (0.633) was found to be lower than that by the VRS-DEA method (0.738), while it was higher than that by the CRS-DEA method (0.479). It was found that strong correlation exists between the SFA method and the VRS-DEA method. The method which can utilize both methods in mutually complementing way for the estimation of technical efficiency was also considered.

Keywords

References

  1. Aigner, D., C. Lovell, P. Schmidt, "Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Production Function Models," Journal of Econometrics, Vol.6, No.1, 1997, pp.21-37.
  2. Cooper, W., L. Seiford and K. Tone, Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References, and DEA-Solver Software, The second edition, Springer, 2007.
  3. Fried, H., C. Knox Lovell and S. Schmidt, The measurement of productive efficiency, Oxford University Press, New York, 1993.
  4. Hwang, S. and T. Chang, "Using data envelopment analysis to measure hotel managerial change in Taiwan," Tourism Management, 24, 2003, pp.357 - 369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(02)00112-7
  5. Park, M., Efficiency and productivity analysis, Korea Studies Information Co. Ltd., 2008.
  6. Kim, D., "Measurement of fishing capacity of offshore fisheries in Korea," Journal of Fisheries Business Administration, 37, 2006, pp.1- 24.
  7. Kim, S., T. Choi and D. Lee, Efficiency analysis: theory and application, Seoul Economic and Management Press, 2007.
  8. Kirkley, J., D. Squires and I. Strand, "Assessing Technical Efficiency in Commercial The Mid-Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77, 1995, pp.686 - 697. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243235
  9. Kumbhakar S and C. Lovell, Stochastic Frontier Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
  10. Pascoe, S., L. Coglan and S. Mardle, "Physical versus harvest-based measures of capacity: the case of the United Kingdom vessel capacity unit system," ICES Journal of Marine Science, 58, 2001, pp.1243 - 1253. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2001.1093
  11. MIFAFF, Fisheries Yearbook, Republic of Korea, 2009.
  12. Minh, N., G. Long and B. Thang, "Technical efficiency of small and medium firms in Vietnam:parametric and non-parametric approach," Korean Economic Review, 23, 2007, pp.187 - 221.
  13. Sharma, K. and P. Leung, "Technical Efficiency of the Longline Fishery in Hawaii: An Application of a Stochastic Production Frontier," Marine Resource Economics, 13, 1999, pp.259 - 274.
  14. Tsitsika, E., C. Maravelias, P. Wattage and J. Haralabous, "Fishing capacity and utilization of purse seiners using data envelopment analysis," Fisheries Science, 74,2008, pp.730 - 735. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-2906.2008.01583.x
  15. Zheng, Y. and Y. Zhou, "Measures of the fishing capacity of Chinese marine fleets and discussion of the methods," Journal of Oceanography, 61,2005, pp.623 - 630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10872-005-0070-y