Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea (한국전산구조공학회논문집)

Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea (한국전산구조공학회)
권호 표지

An Evaluation of Blast Resistance Performance of RC Columns According to the Shape of Cross Section

단면의 형상에 따른 철근콘크리트 기둥의 폭발저항 성능 평가

  • 김한수 (건국대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 박재표 (건국대학교 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2010.07.05
  • Accepted : 2010.08.09
  • Published : 2010.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The alternative load path method based on a column removal scenario has been commonly used to protect building structures from being progressively collapsed due to probable blast loading. However, this method yields highly conservative result when the columns still have substantial load resisting capacity after blast. In this study, the behavior of RC columns with rectangular and circular sections under the blast loading was investigated and the remaining capacity of the partially damaged columns was compared. AUTODYN which is a hydrocode for the analysis of the structure on the impact and blast loading was used for this study. The blast loading was verified with the experiment results. The analysis results showed that the circular columns are preferable to the rectangular ones in respect of the blast resistance performance.

현재 연쇄붕괴를 방지하기 위한 설계 방법으로 기둥제거 시나리오를 이용한 대체하중경로법을 주로 적용하고 있다. 하지만 실제로 폭발이 발생하여 기둥이 완전히 제거되지 않는 경우에 기둥제거 시나리오를 적용하면 보수적인 결과를 얻게 된다. 본 논문에서는 단일 기둥이 폭발하중을 받을 때의 거동을 평가함으로써 폭발이후에도 기둥이 연쇄붕괴 방지에 기여할 수 있는지 여부를 판단하였다. 하이드로코드인 AUTODYN을 이용하였으며, 같은 단면적과 높이를 갖는 사각형 기둥과 원형 기둥의 폭발저항성능을 비교하였다. 우선 AUTODYN을 이용한 폭발하중 산정 결과를 폭발실험값과 비교한 다음 간단한 폭발 예제를 통해 계산된 폭발압력파가 실제와 유사함을 입증하였다. 단면 형상에 따른 기둥의 폭발저항 성능 해석을 수행한 후 잔류변형을 이용한 평가법을 이용해 원형기둥이 사각형 기둥보다 폭발저항 성능이 더 우수함을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 이나현, 김성배, 김장호, 최종권 (2009) 폭발하중을 받는 콘크리트 구조물의 실험적 거동분석 : (1)실험수행절차, 대한토목학회 논문집, 29(5A), pp.557-564.
  2. Ansys (2005) AUTODYN Theory Manual, Century dynamics, pp.235.
  3. Carriere M, Heffernan P.J., Wight R.G., Braimah A (2009) Behaviour of Steel Reinforced Polymer Strengthened RC Members under Blast Load, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 36, pp.1356-1365. https://doi.org/10.1139/L09-053
  4. Champman T.C., Rose T.A., Smith P.D. (1994) Blast Wave Simulation using AUTODYN 2D: A Parametric Study, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 16, pp.777-787.
  5. Crawford J.E., Malvar L.J., Morrill K.B., Ferritto J.M. (2001) Composite Retrofits to Increase the Blast Resistance of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, 10th International Symposium on Interaction of the Effects of Munitions with Structures, P-01-13.
  6. Fairlie G.E. (1997) Efficient Analysis of High Explosive Air Blast in Complex Urban Geometries Using the AUTODYN-2D & 3D Hydrocodes, Analytical and Experimental Methods, 15th International Symposium on the Military Applications of Blast and Shock, 146, pp.47-54.
  7. Grote D, Park S, Zhou M (2001) Dynamic Behaviour of Concrete at High Strain Rates, Journal of Impact Engineering, 25, pp.869-886. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00020-3
  8. Luccioni B., Ambrosini D. (2005) Blast Load Assessment Using Hydrocodes, Mecanica Computacional, XXIV, pp.329-344.
  9. Ngo T., Mendis P., Gupta A., Ramsay J. (2007) Blast Loading and Blast Effects on Structures, EJSE International, Load on Structures 2007, pp.76-91.
  10. Nystrom U., Kent Gylltoft (2009) Numerical studies of the combined effects of blast and fragment loading, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 36, pp.995-1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.02.008
  11. Remennikov A.M. (2003) A Review of Methods for Predicting Bomb Blast Effects on Buildings, Journal of Battlefield Technology, 6(3), pp.1-6.
  12. Remennikov A.M. (2007), The State of the art of Explosive Loads Characterisation, AEES2007, The Australian Earthquake Engineering Society, http://www.aees.org.au/Proceedings/2007_Papers/ 07_Remenikov,_Alex.pdf- 2010/06/30.
  13. Showichen Adisak (2008) Numerical analysis of vehicle bottom structures subjected to anti-tank mine explosions, PhD Thesis, Cranfield University, p.311.
  14. Smith P.D., Hetherington J.G. (1994) Blast and ballistic loading of structure, Laxton's, Great Britain, p.336.
  15. Xiaoli B., Bing L. (2010) Residual Strength of Blast Damaged Reinforced Concrete Columns, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 37, pp.295-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.04.003
  16. Zukas J.A. (2004) Introduction to Hydrocodes, Elsevier, UK, p.313.