DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Qualitative Study on Intergenerational Ambivalence of Mothers with Preschool Children

취학 전 자녀를 둔 어머니의 세대 간 양가감정에 관한 질적연구

  • Kim, In-Jee (Department of Child and Family Studies, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Se-In (Department of Child and Family Studies, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Sook-Hyun (Department of Child and Family Studies, Yonsei University)
  • 김인지 (연세대학교 아동가족학과) ;
  • 이세인 (연세대학교 아동가족학과) ;
  • 이숙현 (연세대학교 아동가족학과)
  • Received : 2009.11.30
  • Accepted : 2010.03.16
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this qualitative research is to explore the intergenerational ambivalence of mothers with preschoolers. Twenty full-time mothers and 19 working mothers were interviewed in depth. Most of the participants who received instrumental support from their mothers showed ambivalence, and especially the working mothers were more likely to feel ambivalence than the full-time mothers. However, participants who received little or no support from their mothers did not report any ambivalent feelings. Their ambivalent feelings came from both their social structure and intrapersonal contradictions. In order to avoid ambivalent feelings, some participants redefined receiving support from their mothers as a positive thing. Meanwhile, the participants who received active support tried to divert their ambivalence by providing child care support for their children, and they showed a 'repayment provision' tendency. Some working mothers and most of the full-time mothers said they would allot 'limited provision' by excluding child care support for their children. Those who were aware of this ambivalence issue sought 'reasonable provision' for their children. Depending on these results, several suggestions are presented to solve the ambivalence.

Keywords

References

  1. 성미애(2004). 질적 연구를 통한 한국 가족의 양계화 현상에 대한 진단적 접근. 한국가정관리학회지, 24(3), 59-72.
  2. 이동원, 김현주, 최선희, 함인희, 김선영(2002). 한국가족의 현주소: 현장 연구 리포트. 서울: 학지사.
  3. 이숙현, 김인지, 이세인(2009). 여성들의 모성 경험에 반영된 모성 이데올로기. 연세대학교 어린이생활지도연구원 연구 보고서.
  4. 이재경(1999). 여성의 경험을 통해 본 한국 가족의 근대적 변형. 한국여성학, 15(2), 55-86.
  5. 조정문(1997). 한국사회 친족관계의 양계화 경향에 관한 연구. 한국여성학, 13(1), 87-114.
  6. 한경혜, 윤성은(2004). 한국가족 친족관계의 양계화 경향: 세대관계를 중심으로. 한국인구학, 27(2), 177-203.
  7. 한남제(1997). 한국가족제도의 변화. 서울: 일지사
  8. 한민아, 한경혜(2004). 세대간 지원교환유형과 성인자녀의 심리적 복지감. 한국가족관계학회지, 9(1), 135-152.
  9. Beck-Gernsheim(2005). Was kommt nach der Familie? 가족 이후에 무엇이 오는가. 박은주(역). 서울: 새물결. (1998년 원저발간)
  10. Connidis, I. A., & McMullin, J. A.(2002). Sociological ambivalence and family ties: A critical perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 558-567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00558.x
  11. Creswell, J. W.(1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  12. Fingerman, K. L., Hay, E. L., & Birditt, K. S.(2004). The best of ties, the worst of ties: Close, problematic, and ambivalent social relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 792-808. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00053.x
  13. Hawkins, A. J., Christiansen, S. L., Sargent, K. P., & Hill, E. J.(1993). Rethinking father's involvement in child care: A developmental perspective. Journal of Family Issues, 14(4), 531-549. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251393014004004
  14. Lettke, F., & Klein, D. M.(2004). Methodological issues in assessing ambivalences in intergenerational relations. In Pillemer, K., & Luscher, K.(Eds.) Intergenerational ambivalences: New perspectives on parent-child relations in later life(pp. 85-113). Belgium: Elsevier/JAI Press.
  15. Litwak, E., & Kulis, S.(1987). Technology, proximity and measure of kin support. Journal of Marriage and Family, 49, 649-661. https://doi.org/10.2307/352210
  16. Lorenz-Meyer, D.(2004). The ambivalences of parental care among young German adults. In Pillemer, K., & Luscher, K.(Eds.) Intergenerational ambivalences: New perspectives on parent-child relations in later life(pp. 225-252). Belgium: Elsevier/JAI Press.
  17. Luscher, K., & Pillemer, K.(1998). Intergenerational ambivalence: A new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 413-425. https://doi.org/10.2307/353858
  18. Peters, C. L., Hooker, K., & Zvonkovic, A. M.(2006). Older parents' perceptions of ambivalence in relationships with their children. Family Relations, 55, 539-551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00424.x
  19. Pillemer, K., & Luscher, K.(2004). Introduction: Ambivalence in parent-child relations in later life. In Pillemer, K., & Luscher, K.(Eds.) Intergenerational ambivalences: New perspectives on parent-child relations in later life(pp. 1-19). Belgium: Elsevier/JAI Press.
  20. Willson, A. E., Shuey, K. M., & Elder, G. H.(2003). Ambivalence in the relationship of adult children to aging parent and in-laws. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 1055-1072. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.01055.x
  21. Van Gaalen, R. I., & Dykstra, P. A.(2006). Solidarity and conflict between adult children and parents: A latent class analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 947-960. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00306.x

Cited by

  1. The Mediation Effects of Ambivalence for Elderly Parents on the Relations among Dependence and Intrusiveness of Elderly Parents and Psychological Well-Being of Middle Aged Children: Focusing on Gender Differences vol.54, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2016.018
  2. Providing and Utilizing Child Care by Grandmothers in South Korea : Grandmothers' and Employed Mothers' Relationship Experiences vol.31, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7466/JKHMA.2013.31.2.001
  3. 맞벌이 가정 조모의 손자녀 양육경험와 양육갈등에 관한 현상학적 연구: 조모와 취업모 관점에서 vol.11, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.14698/jkcce.2015.11.239
  4. 후속 출산을 포기한 한 자녀 어머니들의 임신·출산 및 양육경험에 대한 질적 분석 vol.16, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.14698/jkcce.2020.16.04.001
  5. Effect of Appearance Instrumentality on the Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery: Moderated Mediation Effects of Ambivalent Emotions toward Attractive Friends and Appearance Appreciation vol.21, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.7233/ijcf.2021.21.1.038