DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Perceived Motivation of Corporate Social Responsibility to Fashion Brand and Consumer-Brand Relationship Building

패션브랜드의 사회적 책임활동 동기에 대한 지각과 소비자-브랜드 관계 형성

  • Choi, Mi-Young (Department of Fashion Design, Duksung Women's University) ;
  • Yoon, Nam-Hee (Fashion Planning Team, Korea Color & Fashion Trend Center)
  • 최미영 (덕성여자대학교 의상디자인) ;
  • 윤남희 (한국컬러&패션트랜드센터 패션기획팀)
  • Received : 2010.05.02
  • Accepted : 2010.06.04
  • Published : 2010.07.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of the perceived motivations of the corporate social marketing to fashion brand and the process of consumer-brand relationship building. In this study, we proposed the hypotheses on the relationships among six focal variables. The collected data were analyzed by frequency analysis, reliability analysis, factor analysis and covariance structure analysis with SPSS 12.0 program and AMOS 7.0. 519 complete responses were obtained from core female adults consumers in fashion market. The results were as follows. First, philanthropic motivation significantly affected both benevolence and expert-based trust, but economic motivation significantly affected expert-based trust only. Second, there were significant effects in consumer trust and brand emotion. Third, the brand emotion had a strong influence on brand commitment. The results of this study will help fashion corporations to understand the relative importance of the two different motivations of CSR activities in building consumer-brand relationships.

Keywords

References

  1. 김자경, 김정현(2001). 공익연계 마케팅이 소비자 반응에 미치는 영향. 광고학연구, 12(3), 31-51.
  2. 문희강(2008). 상표충성 소비자의 상표관계본질과 상표충성 성향. 대한가정학회지, 46(3), 57-71.
  3. 박수정(2009). 기업명성과 기업의 사회적 책임 활동의 동기와 적합성이 기업 정 당성 인식에 미치는 영향. 한국언론정보학보, 45(spring), 496-553.
  4. 예종석, 조윤성(2009). 기업 사회공헌활동이 고객과의 관계 품질에 미치는 영향. 한국비영리연구, 8(1), 37-83.
  5. 윤각, 서상희(2003). 기업의 사회공헌 활동과 기업광고가 기업이미지와 브랜드 태도 형성에 미치는 영향력에 관한 연구. 광고연구, 61, 47-72.
  6. 이학식, 임지훈(2008). 구조방정식 모형분석과 AMOS 7.0. 서울: 법문사.
  7. 이한준, 박종철(2009). 기업의 사회적 책임활동이 제품 및 기업평가에 미치는 영향: 신뢰의 매개역할을 중심으로. 마케팅연구, 24(16), 231-250.
  8. 장진희(2005). 공익연계 마케팅이 소비자의 브랜드 태도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 부산대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구논문.
  9. 조형오(2000). 공익연계 광고 메시지가 소비자의 의사결정 과정에 미치는 영향: 상표 친숙도와 공익적 특성의 매개 역할을 중심으로. 광고연구, 49, 231-249.
  10. 조형오(2006a). 기업의 공익활동 유형에 따른 소비자 인식의 차이가 제품광고에 대한 인지적 반응에 미치는 영향: 자선적 공익활동과 기능적 공익활동의 특성을 중심으로. 홍보학연구, 10(1), 5-39.
  11. 조형오(2006b). 기업의 공익활동의 유형이 기업에 대한 인지적 반응과 광고메세지에 대한 반응과정에 미치는 영향: 공익적 부합성과 호감도 차원의 매개 역할을 중심으로. 광고학연구, 17(5), 91-102.
  12. 채진미, 이은영(2007). 패션상품 소비자가 인식하는 상표관계본질(BRQ)의 개념적 구조 (제1보). 한국의류학회지, 31(7), 1020-1029. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2007.31.7.1020
  13. 한은경, 류은아(2003). 기업의 사회책임활동이 구매의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 광고연구. 60, 155-178.
  14. Amalric, F., & Hauser, J.(2005). Economic drivers of corporate responsibility activities. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 20(4), 27-38.
  15. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W.(1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychology Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  16. Bae, J., & Cameron, G. T.(2006). The conditioning effect of prior reputation on perception of corporate giving. Public Relations Review, 32(2), 144-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.02.007
  17. Barone, M., Miyazakiand, A. D., & Taylor, K. A.(2000). The Influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: Dose one good turn deserve another? Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 28(2), 248-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300282006
  18. Becker-Olson K. L., Cudmore B. A., & Hill R. P.(2006), The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.01.001
  19. Berger, I. E., Cunningham, M. P., & Kozinets, R. V.(1996). The processing of cause-related advertising: Cues, arguments, biases or motivators. Working Paper, Marketing Department, Queens University.
  20. Bhattacharya, C. B., Korschun, D., & Sen, S.(2009). Strengthening Stakeholder-Company relationship through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9730-3
  21. Brink, D. V., Odekerken, S. G., & Pauwels, P.(2006). The effect of strategic and tactical cause-related marketing on consumers'brand loyalty, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760610641127
  22. Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A.(1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses, Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68-84. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252190
  23. Carroll, A. B.(1979). A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy Management of Review, 4, 497-505.
  24. Creyer. E. H., & Ross, W. T.(1997). The influence of behavior on purchase intention: Do consumer really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(6), 421-432. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363769710185999
  25. Dean, D. H.(2004). Consumer perception of corporate donations. Journal of Advertising, 32(4), 91-102.
  26. Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35-51. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251829
  27. Drumwright, M. E. (1996). Company advertising with social dimension: The role of noneconomic criteria. Journal of marketing, 60(4), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251902
  28. Ellen, P. S., Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J.(1996). Consumer reaction to corporate social responsibility: Do attributors make a difference? Working Paper, Department of Marketing Georgia state University.
  29. Ferrell, O. C.(1999). Business ethics in a global economy. Journal of Marketing Management, 9(1), 65-71.
  30. Folkes V. S., & Kamine, M. A.(1999). Effects of information about firm's ethical and unethical actions on consumer's attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 243-259. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0803_03
  31. Forehand, M. R., & Grier, S.(2003). When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 349-356. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1303_15
  32. Fournier, S.(1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343-353. https://doi.org/10.1086/209515
  33. Ganesan, S.(1994). Determinants of long-Term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252265
  34. Goldsmith, R. E., Lafferty, B. A., & Newell, S. J.(2000). The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to and advertisement and brand. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2000.10673616
  35. Gustafssonn, C.(2005). Trust as an instance of asymmetrical reciprocity: An ethics perspective on corporate brand management. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(2), 142-150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2005.00398.x
  36. Handelman, J., & Arnold, S.(1999). The Role of Marketing Actions with a Social Dimension: Appeals to the Institutional Environment. Journal of Marketing, 63(3), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251774
  37. Krol, C.(1996). Consumer note marketers' good causes: Roper. Advertising Age, 67(46), 51.
  38. Kumar, N. L., Scheer, K., Jan-Benedict, E., & Steenkamp, M.(1995). The effect of supplier fairness on vulnerable resellers. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(1), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152110
  39. Lafferty, B. A., & Goldsmith, R. E.(2005). Cause-brand alliances: Does the cause help the brand or does the brand help the cause? Journal of Business Research, 58, 423-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.07.001
  40. Lichtenstein, D. R., Drumwright, M. E., & Braig, B. M.(2004). The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported non-profits. Journal of marketing, 68(4), 16-32. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.4.16.42726
  41. Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C.(2003). Nature of corporate responsibilities perspectives from American, French, and German consumers. Journal of Business research, 56, 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00222-3
  42. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D.(1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
  43. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C.(2002). Developing and validating trust measures for ecommerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334-359. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81
  44. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S.(2001). Corporate socialresponsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
  45. Menon, S., & Kahn, B.(2003). Corporate sponsorships of philanthropic activities: When do they impact perception of sponsor brand? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 316-327. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1303_12
  46. Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J.(2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(1), 121-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2005.00006.x
  47. Morales, A. C.(2005), Giving firms an "E"for effort: Consumer responses to high-effort firms. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 806-812. https://doi.org/10.1086/426615
  48. Murphy, D.(1997). Mutual attractions. Marketing, October 2, 30-33.
  49. Murray, K. B., & Vogel, C. M.(1997). Using a hierarchyof-effects approach to gauge the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility to generate goodwill toward the firm. Journal of Business Research, 38, 141-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(96)00061-6
  50. Pivato, S., Misani, N., & Tencati, A.(2008). The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust: the case of organic food. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(1), 3-12.
  51. Ross, J. K., Patterson, L. T., & Stutts, M. A.(1992). Consumer perception of organizations that use cause relate marketing. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science. 20(1), 93-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723480
  52. Smith, G., & Stodghill, R.(1994). Are good cause good marketing? Business Week, March 21, 64-66.
  53. Strahilevitz, M.(2003). The effects of prior impressions of a firm's ethics on the success of a cause-related marketing campaign: Do the good look better while the bad look worse? Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.1300/J054v11n01_06
  54. Strroup, M. A., & Neubert, R. L.(1987). The evolution of social responsibility. Business Horizons, 30, 22-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(87)90004-8
  55. Varadarajan, P. R., & Menon, A.(1988). Cause-related marketing: A co-alignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of arketing, 52(3), 58-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251450
  56. White, T. B.(2005). Consumer trust and advice acceptance: The moderating roles benevolence, expertise, and negative emotions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(2), 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1502_6
  57. Yoon, S., & Kim, H.(2008). Antecedents of consumer attitudes toward cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising Research, 48(1), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.2501/S0021849908080136
  58. Yoon, Y. S., Guihan-Canli, Z., & Schwarz, N.(2006) The effect of corporate social responsibility(CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 377-390. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_9

Cited by

  1. Consumers' Perception of Fashion Companies' Sustainability and Its Effect on Trust, Preference, and Purchase Intention vol.39, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2015.39.5.656
  2. The Effect on Korean Consumers' Brand Preference, Trust and Purchase Intention for Donation Amount Information of Luxury Fashion Brands vol.18, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12940/jfb.2014.18.6.19
  3. 국내 섬유패션산업의 사회적 책임 경영에 관한 연구 -웹사이트상의 정보공시 현황을 중심으로- vol.21, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12940/jfb.2017.21.1.45
  4. 중국 진출 한국 패션 브랜드의 CSR 적합성이 소비자 만족 및 브랜드 태도에 미치는 영향과 자민족 중심주의의 조절효과 vol.59, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2021.030