DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analytical Interpretation of Cultural Resources in Terms of Digital Archiving

디지털 아카이빙으로서의 문화자원에 대한 해석

  • Chung, Jun-Min (Department of Library and Information Science, Chonnam National University)
  • Received : 2010.05.27
  • Accepted : 2010.06.15
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

This paper starts with the question, what are culture and cultural resources? The meanings of cultural resources are mentioned historically and archaeologically. The culture dynamic is introduced and the cultural resources are interpreted as processes and practices along with which culture is produced and reproduced through the action of individual. Digital archiving concluds that the cultural resources are only meaningful when they are archived with their contexts and processes. Finally paper induces that cultural archives could be valuable, when they are preserved (synthetic), recognized (contextual) and enjoyed (exhibited, experienced or practically used).

문화와 문화자원에 대한 물음을 전제로 문화자원에 대한 고고학적, 역사적 해석을 시도하였다. 인간의 개별적 행위를 통한 생산과 재생산의 개념으로 문화를 인식하였으며 그 과정과 실천으로 문화역동성 (cultural dynamic)을 표출하였다. 이 논문은 문화자원을 디지털 아카이빙하기 위해서는 문화자원과 함께 그 자원의 생산과정과 의미맥락이 동시에 표현되어야 함을 주장하고 있다. 궁극에 문화자원에 대한 추론과정에서 문화자원은 자원과 관련한 모든 관계자원이 동시에 보존되고 이것의 의미맥락이 살아 있어야 하며 전시, 체험을 비롯한 실제적 활용이 전제되어야 함을 밝히고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Boyacigiller, N., M. Kleinberg, M. Phillips, and S. Sackmann. 1996. “Conceptualizing culture” In: B. Punnett and O. Shenkar (eds.), Handbook for International Research, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 157-208.
  2. Cain, Jeff and Frank. Romanelli. 2009. “E-professionalism: anew paradigm for a digital age.” Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 1: 66-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2009.10.001
  3. Chaudhry, Abdus Sattar and Jiun, Tan Pei. 2005. “Enhancing access to digital information resources on heritage: A case of development of a taxonomy at the Integrated Museum and Archives System in Singapore.” Journal of Documentation, 61(6): 751-776. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410510632077
  4. Chowdhury, G. 2010. “From digital libraries to digital preservation research: the importance of users and context.” Journal of Documentation, 66(2): 207-223. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411011023625
  5. Chowdhury, G. and S. Chowdhury. 1999. “Digital library research: major issues and trends.” Journal of Documentation, 55(4): 409-448. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007154
  6. Green, William and John F. Doershuk. 1998. “Cultural Resource Management and American Archaeology.” Cultural Journal of Archaeological Research, 6(2): 121-167.
  7. Hofstede, G. 2003. Culture's Consequencies: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations, 2nd rev. ed., Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  8. ISO. 2001. Information and Documentation - Records Management, Part 1: General [ISO 15489-1:2001(E)]: 19.
  9. King, Thomas F. 2000. “What should be the ‘cultural resources’ element of an EIA?” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(1):5-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(99)00003-7
  10. King Thomas F. 1998. “How the archeologists stole culture. A gap in American environmental impact assessment and how to fill it.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 18(2): 117-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(97)00064-4
  11. Lowenthal, David. 1985. The Past is a Foreign Country. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Martin, J. 2002. Organizational Culture: Mapping the Terrain, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  13. Mascarenhas, Andre Ofenhejm and Flavio Carvalho. de Vasconcelos. 2009. “What Does Captain Cook Have to Tell Us About Culture?” International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 9(3): 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595809346605
  14. Schein, E. 2004. Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd ed., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  15. Staber, U. 2006. “Social capital processes in cross-cultural management.” International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6(2): 189-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595806066328
  16. Zimmerman, Diane Leenheer. 2006-2007. “Can our culture be saved? The future of digital archiving.” Minnesota Law Review, 91(989): 989-1046.

Cited by

  1. Trends Analysis of Digital Preservation Research in Korea vol.13, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2013.13.2.247