Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A hybrid technique for sinus floor elevation in the severely resorbed posterior maxilla

  • Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Hong, Ji-Youn (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Seok (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2010.02.10
  • Accepted : 2010.03.25
  • Published : 2010.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the modified sinus floor elevation technique described hereafter as a "hybrid technique," in 11 patients with severely resorbed posterior maxillae. Methods: Eleven patients who received 22 implants in the maxillary premolar and molar areas by the hybrid technique were enrolled in this study. A slot-shaped osteotomy for access was prepared on the lateral wall along the lower border of the sinus floor. The Schneiderian membrane was fully reflected through the lateral slot. Following drilling with the membrane protected by a periosteal elevator, the bone was grafted. All implants were placed simultaneously with sinus augmentation. The cumulative success rate was calculated and clinical parameters were recorded. Radiographic measurements were performed. Results: All implants were well maintained at last follow up (cumulative success rate=100%). The mean residual bone height, augmented bone height, crown-to-implant ratio, and marginal bone loss were $4.1{\pm}1.64mm$, $8.76{\pm}1.77mm$, $1.21{\pm}0.34mm$, and $0.34{\pm}0.72mm$, respectively. Conclusions: Simultaneous implant placement with sinus augmentation by hybrid technique showed successful clinical results over a 2-year observation period and may be a reliable modality for reconstruction of a severely resorbed posterior maxilla.

Keywords

References

  1. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991;62:2-4. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2
  2. Chanavaz M. Anatomy and histophysiology of the periosteum: quantification of the periosteal blood supply to the adjacent bone with 85Sr and gamma spectrometry. J ral Implantol 1995;21:214-9.
  3. Sharan A, Madjar D. Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions: a radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:48-56.
  4. Pietrokovski J, Massler M. Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction. J Prosthet Dent 1967;17:21-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(67)90046-7
  5. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980;38:613-6.
  6. Geurs NC, Wang IC, Shulman LB, Jeffcoat MK. Retrospective radiographic analysis of sinus graft and implant placement procedures from the Academy of Osseointe-gration Consensus Conference on Sinus Grafts. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001;21:517-23.
  7. Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, Iacono VJ. Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13 Suppl:11-45.
  8. Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:216-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x
  9. Tatum H, Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986;30:207-29.
  10. Wallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003;8:328-43. https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.328
  11. Wood RM, Moore DL. Grafting of the maxillary sinus with intraorally harvested autogenous bone prior to implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:209-14.
  12. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium 1994;15:152-8.
  13. Pommer B, Unger E, Suto D, Hack N, Watzek G. Mechanical properties of the Schneiderian membrane in vitro. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:633-7.
  14. Aimetti M, Romagnoli R, Ricci G, Massei G. Maxillary sinus elevation: the effect of macrolacerations and microlacerations of the sinus membrane as determined by endoscopy. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001;21:581-9.
  15. Becker ST, Terheyden H, Steinriede A, Behrens E, Springer I, Wiltfang J. Prospective observation of 41 perforations of the Schneiderian membrane during sinus floor elevation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1285-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01612.x
  16. Berengo M, Sivolella S, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. Endoscopic evaluation of the bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation procedure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;33:189-94. https://doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2002.0459
  17. Nkenke E, Schlegel A, Schultze-Mosgau S, Neukam FW, Wiltfang J. The endoscopically controlled osteotome sinus floor elevation: a preliminary prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:557-66.
  18. Hernandez-Alfaro F, Torradeflot MM, Marti C. Prevalence and management of Schneiderian membrane perforations during sinus-lift procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:91-8.
  19. Proussaefs P, Lozada J, Kim J, Rohrer MD. Repair of the perforated sinus membrane with a resorbable collagen membrane: a human study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:413-20.
  20. Bruschi GB, Scipioni A, Calesini G, Bruschi E. Localized management of sinus floor with simultaneous implant placement: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:219-26.
  21. Rosen PS, Summers R, Mellado JR, Salkin LM, Shanaman RH, Marks MH, et al. The bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation technique: multicenter retrospective report of consecutively treated patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:853-8.
  22. Zitzmann NU, Scharer P. Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla. Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:8-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90391-2
  23. Cutler SJ, Ederer F. Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. J Chronic Dis 1958;8:699-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(58)90126-7
  24. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, Weingart D, Taylor TM, Bernard JP. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13;144-53 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130204.x
  25. Friberg B. The posterior maxilla: clinical considerations and current concepts using Branemark System implants. Periodontol 2000 2008;47:67-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2007.00238.x
  26. Vitkov L, Gellrich NC, Hannig M. Sinus floor elevation via hydraulic detachment and elevation of the Schneiderian membrane. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:615-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01161.x
  27. Doud Galli SK, Lebowitz RA, Giacchi RJ, Glickman R, Jacobs JB. Chronic sinusitis complicating sinus lift surgery. Am J Rhinol 2001;15:181-6. https://doi.org/10.2500/105065801779954120
  28. Tidwell JK, Blijdorp PA, Stoelinga PJ, Brouns JB, Hinderks F. Composite grafting of the maxillary sinus for placement of endosteal implants. A preliminary report of 48 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;21:204-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80219-X
  29. Di Girolamo M, Napolitano B, Arullani CA, Bruno E, Di Girolamo S. Paroxysmal positional vertigo as a complication of osteotome sinus floor elevation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2005;262:631-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-004-0879-9
  30. Penarrocha-Diago M, Rambla-Ferrer J, Perez V, Perez-Garrigues H. Benign paroxysmal vertigo secondary to placement of maxillary implants using the alveolar expansion technique with osteotomes: a study of 4 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:129-32.
  31. Saker M, Ogle O. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo subsequent to sinus lift via closed technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:1385-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.05.296
  32. Betts NJ, Miloro M. Modification of the sinus lift procedure for septa in the maxillary antrum. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52:332-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(94)90313-1
  33. Van den Bergh JP, ten Bruggenkate CM, Disch FJ, Tuinzing DB. Anatomical aspects of sinus floor elevations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:256-65. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011003256.x
  34. Kim MJ, Jung UW, Kim CS, Kim KD, Choi SH, Kim CK, et al. Maxillary sinus septa: prevalence, height, location, and morphology. A reformatted computed tomography scan analysis. J Periodontol 2006;77:903-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050247
  35. Velasquez-Plata D, Hovey LR, Peach CC, Alder ME. Maxillary sinus septa: a 3-dimensional computerized tomo-graphic scan analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:854-60.
  36. Pikos MA. Maxillary sinus membrane repair: report of a technique for large perforations. Implant Dent 1999;8:29-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199901000-00003
  37. Small SA, Zinner ID, Panno FV, Shapiro HJ, Stein JI. Augmenting the maxillary sinus for implants: report of 27 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:523-8.
  38. Timmenga NM, Raghoebar GM, Boering G, van Weis-senbruch R. Maxillary sinus function after sinus lifts for the insertion of dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:936-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90063-X
  39. Cho SC, Wallace SS, Froum SJ, Tarnow DP. Influence of anatomy on Schneiderian membrane perforations during sinus elevation surgery: three-dimensional analysis. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2001;13:160-3.
  40. Tarnow DP, Wallace SS, Froum SJ, Rohrer MD, Cho SC. Histologic and clinical comparison of bilateral sinus floor elevations with and without barrier membrane placement in 12 patients: Part 3 of an ongoing prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000;20:117-25.

Cited by

  1. Tenting effect of the elevated sinus membrane over an implant with adjunctive use of a hydroxyapatite‐powdered collagen membrane in rabbits vol.26, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12362
  2. Sinus augmentation using rhBMP-2-loaded synthetic bone substitute with simultaneous implant placement in rabbits vol.47, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2017.47.2.86
  3. Implant Placement in Posterior Maxilla Using Modified Lateral Approach: Case Reports vol.21, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12972/implant.20170014
  4. Maxillary Sinusitis Associated With Peri‐implantitis at Sinus Floor Augmented Sites : Case Series vol.28, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1097/id.0000000000000922
  5. Minimally Invasive Lateral Approach through Circular Window with a Diameter of 5 to 6 mm for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation with Simultaneous Implant Placement: Retrospective Study vol.11, pp.17, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11178244