Performance of HFC152a, HFC134a and HC290 Mixtures as Alternative Refrigerants for HFC134a

HFC152a, HFC134a, 프로판을 포함한 자동차용 대체/보충 냉매의 성능

  • 강남구 (인하대학교 대학원 기계공학과) ;
  • 배근환 (인하대학교 대학원 기계공학과) ;
  • 박기정 (인하대학교 가계공학과) ;
  • 정동수 (인하대학교 가계공학과)
  • Received : 2010.03.02
  • Accepted : 2010.04.01
  • Published : 2010.06.10

Abstract

In this study, HFC152a, HFC134a/HFC152a and HC290/HFC134a/HFC152a mixtures are studied for the supplementary and alternative refrigerants for HFC134a used in automobile air-conditioners. Due to the high global warming potential of HFC134a, it has to be phased out in the long run. Thermodynamic performance of these refrigerants are measured in a bench tester of 3.5 kW capacity with an open type compressor under both summer and winter conditions. Test results show that the coefficient of performance (COP) and capacity of pure HFC152a and HFC134a/HFC152a mixture are 9.1~12% and 7% higher than those of HFC134a. As for the HC290/HFC134a/HFC152a, the COP is up to 9.5% higher than that of HFC134a with 1~2% of HC290 while that is up to 6.1% lower than that of HFC134a with 5% HC290. The capacity of the ternary mixture, however, is 8.6% higher than that of HFC134a at all compositions tested. The compressor discharge temperatures of all refrigerants tested are $6{\sim}10^{\circ}C$ higher than that of HFC134a. For all refrigerants, the amount of charge is reduced up to 32% due to the decrease in liquid density. Overall, these refrigerants provide good performance with reasonable energy savings with less environmental problem and thus can be used as long term alternatives for automobile air-conditioners.

Keywords

References

  1. United nations environment programme, 1987, Montreal protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer, Final act, New York, United Nations.
  2. United nations environment programme, 2002, Production and consumption of ozone depleting substances under the montreal protocol 1986-2000, Ozone secretariat, UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya.
  3. Dupont fluorochemicals, 1988, Disassembly and inspection of compressor in laboratory refrigerator charged with R-134a, Report NIST- 13, E. I., Dupont de nemours and company incorporated, Wilmington, DE, USA.
  4. Global environmental change report, 1997, A brief analysis of the kyoto protocol, Vol. IX, No. 24.
  5. Intergovernmental panel on climate change, 1996, Climate change 1995 : the science of climate change, Cambridge university Press, p. 22.
  6. Tasi, W. T., 2005, An overview of environmental hazards and exposure and explosive risk of hydrofluorocarbon HFCs, Chemosphere Vol. 61, pp. 1539-1547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.03.084
  7. Directive 2006/40/EC of the european parliament and of the council, 2006, Official journal of the european union, Vol. 14. No. 6.
  8. Horrocks, P., 2006, EU F-Gases regulation and MAC directive, ECCP-1 Review, European commission environment directorate, Brussels, Belgium, 01.03.06.
  9. Jetter, J., 1996, Evaluation of alternatives for HFC-134a refrigerant in motor vehicle air conditioning, Proceedings of the international conference on ozone protection technologies, Washington, DC, pp. 845-854.
  10. Park, K. J., Woo, S. G. and Jung D., 2007, Lower flammability limits of flammable refrigerants according to ASTM E681-04 standard, SAREK, Vol. 19, No. 10, pp. 726-734.
  11. Shin, J. S., Park, W. G. and Kim, M. H., 2008, Test results of refrigerant R152a in a mobile air-conditioning system, Int. j. air-conditioning and refrigeration, Vol. 16, pp. 44-50.
  12. Baker, J., Ghodbane, M., Scherer, L. Kadle, P. and Hill, W., 2003, R-152a refrigeration system for mobile air conditioning, SAE, 2003-01-0731.
  13. Lee, J. I., Kwon, I. W. and Ha, O. N., 2003, A study on the characteristics an azeotropic mixture combined with $CF_3I$ and a refrigerant for air-conditioner HFC-152a and HFC-152a, Int. j. air-conditioning and refrigeration, Vol. 11, pp. 140-149.
  14. Kruse, H., 1996, The state of the art of the hydrocarbon technology in household refrigeration, Proc. of the int. conferences on ozone protection technologies, Washington, DC, pp. 179- 188.
  15. Jung, D., Kim, C., Song, K. and Park, B., 2000, Testing of propane/isobutane mixture in domestic refrigerators, int. j. refrigeration, Vol. 23, pp. 517-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-7007(99)00084-5
  16. Int. energy agency's heat pump center, Informative fact sheet, 2002, Hydrocarbons as refrigerants in residential heat pumps and airconditioners.
  17. Purkayastha, B. and Bansal, P. K., 1998, An experimental study on HC290 and a commercial liquefied petroleum gas(LPG) mix as suitable replacements for HCFC22, Int. j. refrigeration, Vol. 21, pp. 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-7007(97)00083-2
  18. Jung, D., Park, B. and Lee, H., 1999, Evaluation of supplementary/retrofit refrigerants for automobile air-conditioners charged with CFC12, Int. j. refrigeration, Vol. 22, pp. 558-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-7007(99)00022-5
  19. Mulroy, W., Kauffeld, M., McLinden, M. O. and Didion, D. A., 1988, Experimental evaluation of two refrigerant mixtures in a bread-board air conditioner, Proc. of int. inst. refrigeration, Purdue conference on CFCs, Commissions B1, B2, E1 and E2, pp. 27-34.
  20. Didion, D. A. and Bivens, D. B., 1990, Role of refrigerant mixtures as alternatives to CFCs, Int. j. refrigeration, Vol. B, pp. 163-175.
  21. Lemmon, E. W., Huber, M. L., McLinden, M. O., 2007, NIST Reference fluid thermodynamics and transport properties, REFPROP version 8.0.
  22. Domanski, P. A., Didion, D. A. and Chi, J., 2003, NIST Vapor compression cycle design program, CYCLE-D version 3.0.
  23. Maclaine-cross, I. L. and Leonardi., E., 1997, Why hydrocarbons save energy?, Australian AIRAH journal, Vol. 51, pp. 33-37.