International Journal of Fluid Machinery and Systems

Korean Society for Fluid machinery (한국유체기계학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation of Leakage Characteristics of Straight and Stepped Labyrinth Seals

  • Received : 2010.07.05
  • Accepted : 2010.09.17
  • Published : 2010.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Leakage characteristics of two labyrinth seals with different configurations (straight vs stepped) were investigated. Leakage flows were predicted by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for the two configurations and compared with test data. A semi-analytical leakage prediction tool was also tried to predict the leakage. It was confirmed that the CFD gives quite good agreements with test data. The analytical tool also yielded similar leakage behaviors with test results, but the overall agreement with test data was not as good as that of the CFD. The effect of flow direction in the stepped seal on leakage flow was examined. The dependence of leakage performance, in terms of flow function, on the seal clearance size was investigated. Flow function decreased with decreasing clearance in the straight seal, while the trend was reversed in the stepped seal.

Keywords

References

  1. Vermes, G., 1961, “A Fluid Mechanics Approach to the Labyrinth Seal Leakage Problem,” ASME J. of Engineering for Power, April, pp. 161-169.
  2. Stocker, H. L., Cox, D. M. and Holle, G. F., 1977, “Aerodynamic Performance of Conventional and Advanced Design Labyrinth Seals with Solid-Smooth, Abradable, and Honeycomb Lands,” NASA CR-135307.
  3. Stocker, H. L., 1978, “Determining and Improving Labyrinth Seal Performance in Current and Advanced High Performance Gas Turbines,” AGARD Conference Proceedings 237, Paper 13.
  4. Tipton, D. L., Scott, T. E. and Vogel, R. E., 1986, Labyrinth Seal Analysis – Vol. III: Analytical and Experimental Development of a Design Model for Labyrinth Seals, AFWAL-TR-85-2103, Vol. III.
  5. Zimmermann, H. and Wolff, K. H., 1998, “Air System Correlations, Part 1: Labyrinth Seals,” ASME paper 98-GT-206.
  6. Wittig, S., Schelling U., Jacobsen, K. and Kim, S., 1987, “Numerical Predictions and Measurements of Discharge Coefficients in Labyrinth Seals,” ASME paper 87-GT-188.
  7. Schramm, V., Willenborg, K., Kim, S. and Wittig, S., 2000, “Influence of a Honeycomb Facing on the Flow Through a Stepped Labyrinth Seal,” ASME paper 2000-GT-0291.
  8. Soemarwoto, B. I., Kok, J. C., de Cock, K. M. J., Kloosterman, A. B. and Kool, G. A., 2007, “Performance Evaluation of Gas Turbine Labyrinth Seals Using Computational Fluid Dynamics,” ASME paper GT2007-27905.
  9. Kim, T. S., Kang, Y. and Moon, H. K., 2008, “Aerodynamic Performance of Double-Sided Labyrinth Seals,” Proc. of the 4th Int. Symposium on Fluid Machinery and Fluid Engineering, Beijing, China, pp. 377-381.
  10. Kim, T. S. and Cha, K. S., 2009, “Comparative Analysis of the Influence of Labyrinth Seal Configuration on Leakage Behavior,” J of Mechanical Science and Technology, Vol. 23, pp. 2830-2838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-009-0733-5
  11. Waschka, W., Wittig, S. and Kim, S., 1992, “Influence of High Rotational Speeds on the Heat Transfer and Discharge Coefficients in Labyrinth Seals,” ASME J. of Turbomachinery, Vol. 114, pp. 462-468. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2929166
  12. CD-adapco, 2007, STAR-CCM+, ver. 2.07.
  13. Chupp, R. E., Holle, G. and Scott, T. E., 1986, Labyrinth Seal Analysis – Vol. IV: User’s Manual for the Labyrinth Seal Design Model, AFWAL-TR-85-2103, Vol. IV.
  14. Kang, Y., Kim, T. S., Kang, S. Y. and Moon, H. K., 2010, Aerodynamic Performance of Stepped Labyrinth Seals for Gas Turbine Applications, ASME paper GT2010-23256.