Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow

Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society (대한견·주관절의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Isokinetic Strength between Stage 1,2 Impingement Syndrome and Rotator Cuff Tear

1, 2단계 충돌 증후군과 회전근 개 파열 환자의 등속성 근력 비교

  • Kim, Deok-Weon (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital) ;
  • Joo, Hae-Kyun (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital) ;
  • Jung, Jae-Eun (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital)
  • 김덕원 (인제대학교 서울백병원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 주해균 (인제대학교 서울백병원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 정재은 (인제대학교 서울백병원 정형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2010.04.16
  • Accepted : 2010.06.02
  • Published : 2010.06.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this study was to evaluate differences in strength deficits between (i) patients with stage 1 or 2 impingement syndrome and (ii) patients with rotator cuff tears. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 43 patients with stage 1 or 2 impingement syndrome (group 1) and 21 patients with rotator cuff tears (group 2). The isokinetic strength of both groups was evaluated at $60^{\circ}/sec$ for external rotation, internal rotation, adduction and abduction. We measured the peak torque, total work, average power of bilateral sides, peak torque relationship to body weight, and the ratio between unilateral agonist and antagonist. Results: The isokinetic strength deficits assessed in ratio of peak torque to body weight for group 1 and group 2 respectively were; $28.48{\pm}23.76%$ and $29.12{\pm}32.81%$ for abduction (p=0.929), $7.20{\pm}13.98%$ and $18.94{\pm}19.52%$; for adduction (p=0.021), $16.88{\pm}13.76%$ and $25.80{\pm}24.07%$; for external rotation (p=0.221), and $14.1{\pm}25.67%$ and $29.02{\pm}35.06%$ for internal rotation (p=0.059). For average power and total work, group 2 showed a significantly greater deficit for adduction and internal rotation than group 1. Conclusion: Those with rotator cuff tears have more isokinetic muscle strength deficits than those with stage 1 or 2 impingement syndrome. Progression from stage 1 and 2 impingement syndrome to stage 3 may result in greatest changes in strength deficits for internal rotation and adduction.

목적: 1, 2단계 충돌 증후군과 회전근 개 파열이 있는 환자 사이의 근력 결핍 차이를 비교하였다. 대상 및 방법: 43명의 1, 2단계 충돌 증후군 환자 군 (1군)과 21명의 회전근 개 파열 환자 군 (2군)을 대상으로 하였다. 외회전, 내회전, 외전과 내전의 근력을 $60^{\circ}/sec$ 등속성 검사로 평가했다. 몸무게로 보정한 양측의 최대 우력, 총 일의 양, 평균 근력과 동측의 주동근과 길항근의 비율을 측정하였다. 결과: 양 군에서 몸무게로 보정한 최대 우력의 결핍은 외전에서 각각 $28.48{\pm}23.76%$ (1군), $29.12{\pm}32.81%$ (2군) (p=0.929), 내전에서 $7.20{\pm}13.98%$, $18.94{\pm}19.52%$ (p=0.021), 외회전에서 $16.88{\pm}13.76%$, $25.80{\pm}24.07%$ (p=0.221), 내회전에서 $14.15{\pm}25.67%$, $29.02{\pm}35.06%$ (p=0.059)로 측정되었다. 평균 근력과 총 일의 양에서 2군은 1군과 비교하여 내전력과 내회전력의 결핍이 유의하게 증가되었다. 결론: 2군에서 1군보다 더 큰 근력 결핍을 보였다. 1, 2단계 충돌 증후군 에서 3단계로 진행 시내회전과 내전 근력 결핍 변화가 더 크게 나타날 가능성이 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chun JM, Song JS, Sohn DW: Clinical Outcome and Causative Factors in Patients of Structural Failure after Rotator Cuff Repair. J Korean Shoulder Elbow Soc, 11: 29-36, 2008. https://doi.org/10.5397/CiSE.2008.11.1.029
  2. Erol O, Ozcakar L, Celiker R: Shoulder rotator strength in patient with stage1-2 subacromial impingement: Relationship to pain, disability, and quality of life. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 17: 893-897, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.05.043
  3. Greenfield BH, Donatelli R, Wooden MJ, Wilkes J: Isokinetic evaluation of shoulder rotational strength between the plane of scapula and the frontal plane. Am J Sports Med, 18: 124-128, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659001800202
  4. Joy CM, Joanne R, Darren D, Ken F, Stuart P: The impact of rotator cuff pathology on isometric and isokinetic strength, function and quality of life. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 13: 593-598, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.03.009
  5. Kevin EW, Michael MR, James RA: The Athlete's Shoulder. 2nd ed. Churchill Livingstone: 719-748, 2009.
  6. Kim HM, Teefey SA, Zelig A, Galatz LM, Keener JD, Yamaguchi K: Shoulder Strength in Asymptomatic Individuals with Intact Compared with Torn Rotator Cuffs. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 91: 289-296, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00219
  7. Ko SH, Rhee YG, Jeon HM, Lee CC: The Usefulness of all Arthroscopic Repair with Biceps Incorporation in Massive sized Fullthickness Rotator Cuff tears. J Korean Shoulder Elbow Soc, 10: 106-111, 2007. https://doi.org/10.5397/CiSE.2007.10.1.106
  8. Leroux JL, Codine P, Thomas E, Pocholle M, Mailhe D, Blotman F: Isokinetic Evaluation of Rotational Strength in Normal Shoulders and Shoulders With Impingement syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 304: 108-115, 1994.
  9. Neer CS 2nd: Impingement lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 173: 70-77, 1983.
  10. Park JY, Lee WS, Lee ST: The strength of the rotator cuff before and after subacromial injection of lidocaine. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 17 (Suppl 1): S8-S11, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.06.010
  11. Stephanie MP, Charles LG, Louis JS: After rotator cuff tears, the remaining (intact) tendons are mechanically altered. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 18: 52-57, 2009.

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Rotational Strength in Shoulders with Anterior Instability and Normal Shoulders Using Isokinetic Testing vol.15, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5397/CiSE.2012.15.2.79
  2. Correlation between Subscapularis Tears and the Outcomes of Physical Tests and Isokinetic Muscle Strength Tests vol.19, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2016.19.2.90