DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Metabolic Profiling of Urine Samples from Colorectal Cancer Patients Before and After Surgical Treatments

  • Chae, Young-Kee (Department of Chemistry and Institute for Chemical Biology, Sejong University) ;
  • Kang, Woo-Young (Department of Chemistry and Institute for Chemical Biology, Sejong University) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Hwan (Department of Internal Medicine, Eulji University College of Medicine) ;
  • Joo, Jong-Eun (Department of Pathology, Eulji University College of Medicine) ;
  • Han, Joon-Kil (Department of Surgery, Eulji University College of Medicine) ;
  • Hong, Boo-Whan (Department of Surgery, Eulji University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2009.12.14
  • Published : 2010.06.20

Abstract

Metabolites of urine samples from 6 colorectal cancer patients were analyzed by two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy, where the samples were collected before and after the surgical treatments per patient. NMR data were analyzed with the help of the metabolome database and the statistics software. Urine samples before and after the treatments showed significantly different metabolic profiles from each other. We were able to compare 10 different metabolites. Most of the assigned metabolites of every patient showed a tendency of increase after the surgery except for a few cases. The amount of changes in individual metabolites varied significantly from patient to patient, but the combination of such changes could be used to distinguish the condition before the surgery from after, which could be done by PCA analysis. The analysis via $^{1}H-^{13}C$ HSQC spectra proved to be applicable in assessing and classifying global metabolic profiles of the urines from colorectal cancer patients.

Keywords

References

  1. E. C. Chan, P. K. Koh, M. Mal, P. Y. Cheah, K. W. Eu, A. Backshall, R. Cavill, J. K. Nicholson, H. C. Keun, J. Proteome Res. 8, 352-361, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/pr8006232
  2. J. K. Nicholson, J. C. Lindon, E. Holmes, Xenobiotica 29, 1181-1189, (1999). https://doi.org/10.1080/004982599238047
  3. C. Denkert, J. Budczies, T. Kind, W. Weichert, P. Tablack, J. Sehouli, S. Niesporek, D. Konsgen, M. Dietel, O. Fiehn, Cancer Res. 66, 10795-10804, (2006). https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0755
  4. V. Petrik, A. Loosemore, F. A. Howe, B. A. Bell, M. C. Papadopoulos, British Journal of Neurosurgery 20, 275-280, (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/02688690600999620
  5. J. Yang, G. Xu, Y. Zheng, H. Kong, T. Pang, S. Lv, Q. Yang, Journal of Chromatography B 813, 59-65, (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.09.032
  6. A. Moreno, M. Rey, J. M. Montane, J. Alonso, C. Arus, NMR Biomed. 6, 111-118,(1993). https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.1940060202
  7. D. B. Longley, W. L. Allen, P. G. Johnston, Biochim Biophys Acta 1766, 184-196,(2006).
  8. T. W. M. Fan, Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, 28, 161-219. (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6565(95)01017-3
  9. S. Y. Park, B. S. Hwang, K. H. Ji, J.-R. Rho, J. Kor. Magn. Reson. 11, 122-128, (2007).
  10. W. Y. Kang, Y. K. Chae, J. Kor. Magn. Reson. 13, 7-14, (2009). https://doi.org/10.6564/JKMRS.2009.13.1.007
  11. I. A. Lewis, S. C. Schommer, B. Hodis, K. A. Robb, M. Tonelli, W. M. Westler, M. R.Sussman, J. L. Markley, Analytical Chemistry 79, 9385-9390, (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/ac071583z
  12. F. Delaglio, S. Grzesiek, G. W. Vuister, G. Zhu, J. Pfeifer, A. Bax, J. Biomol. NMR 6, 277-293, (1995).
  13. T. D. Goddard, D. G. Kneller, 3 ed. University of California, San Francisco.
  14. Q. Cui, I. A. Lewis, A. D. Hegeman, M. E. Anderson, J. Li, C. F. Schulte, W. M.Westler, H. R. Eghbalnia, M. R. Sussman, J. L. Markley, Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 162-164, (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0208-162
  15. M. R. Viant, E. S. Rosenblum, R. S. Tieerdema, Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 4982-4989. (2003). https://doi.org/10.1021/es034281x
  16. M. Piotto, F. M. Moussallieh, B. Dillmann, A. Imperiale, A. Neuville, C. Brigand, J. P. Elbayed , K. Bellocq, I. J. Namer, Metabolomics 5, 292-301, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-008-0151-1

Cited by

  1. Applications of NMR spectroscopy based metabolomics: a review vol.17, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.6564/JKMRS.2013.17.1.001
  2. Semiautomated Device for Batch Extraction of Metabolites from Tissue Samples vol.84, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1021/ac203390v