Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems (한국산업정보학회논문지)

Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems (한국산업정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Empirical Study on Influence of SCM Integration Factors on Visibility and Business Performance

SCM 통합요인이 가시성과 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구

  • 김은정 (동의대학교 경영정보학과) ;
  • 김종원 (동의대학교 경영정보학과)
  • Received : 2010.02.10
  • Accepted : 2010.03.20
  • Published : 2010.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Competition among enterprises has been more intensified as one among supply chains in the rapidly changing environment. This study investigated the influence of the supply chain integration factors, such as integration of functions inside an enterprise, integration of suppliers, and integration of customers, on the internal and external visibility, and non-financial and financial performances of enterprises. To test these relationships, the survey was conducted on suppliers, manufacturers, and distributors in Korea which have been implementing SCM. Eighty-one questionnaires were collected and used for this study. The study results using the covariance structure analysis are showed as follows. First, the integration of suppliers had a significant influence on both the internal and the external visibility of enterprises, while the integration of functions inside an enterprise had a significant impact on only the internal visibility of enterprises, and the integration of customers on only the external visibility. Second, the internal and external visibility of enterprises had significant impacts on non-financial performance of enterprises. However, the internal and external visibility of enterprises didn't give any direct or indirect influence on the financial performance of enterprises. Third, the non-financial performance of enterprises had a significant impact on financial performance of enterprises.

최근 급변하는 경쟁 환경에서 기업과 기업 간의 경쟁 차원을 넘어서 공급사슬과 공급사슬과의 경쟁으로 발전하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 공급사슬 통합요인인 기업내부 기능 간 통합, 공급자 통합, 고객 통합이 기업내부 가시성과 기업외부 가시성 및 기업의 비재무적 성과와 재무적 성과에 미치는 영향을 검증하였다. 실증연구를 위해서 국내 SCM을 실행하고 있는 공급업체 제조업체, 유통업체들을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하여 총 81부의 설문자료를 최종 분석하였다. 공변량 구조모형분석을 실시한 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 공급자 통합은 기업내부 가시성과 기업외부 가시성에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으나, 기업내부 기능 간 통합은 기업내부 가시성에만, 고객 통합은 기업외부 가시성에만 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 기업내부 가시성과 기업외부 가시성은 기업의 비재무적 성과에는 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으나, 재무적 성과에는 직접적으로 유의한 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 기업의 비재무적 성과는 재무적 성과에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김계수, "e-supply chain management system 구축 전략의 실행방안에 관한 연구: 제조업을 중심으로," 품질경영학회지, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2004, pp.98-116.
  2. 김수욱, "공급사슬 통합 유형과 다각화 전략의 연계," 경영학연구, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2005, pp.471-496.
  3. 김수욱, 장정주, 이성호, 최강화, "공급사슬 관리 및 기업 성과에 미치는 영향," 대한경영학회지, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2006, pp987-1014.
  4. 김종원, 김은정, "SCM 기업들의 IT전략이 IT투자와 경영성과에 미치는 영향," 한국산업정보학회논문지, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2009, pp.59-71.
  5. 김철수, 김연태, 서창수, 장용식, "The Empirical Study on Web-based Demand Chain Integration Strategy Enhancing Competitive Edge: Efficiency and Customer, Satisfaction," 경영정보학회 하계통합학술대회 논문집, 한국경영정보학회, 2004.
  6. 김형기, 문종범, 최창열, "공급사슬 통합요인이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증분석," e비즈니스연구, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2008, pp.3-25.
  7. 박규성, 내부 공급사슬의 효과적 통합을 위한 촉진요인에 관한 실증연구, 서울대학교 석사학위논문, 2005.
  8. 박상욱, 김수욱, "수요 불확실성과 공급 불확실성의 상호 작용이 공급 사슬 비용에 미치는 효과에 대한 연구," 한국경영과학회지, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2005, pp.81-92.
  9. Anderson, J. and Gerving, D.W., "Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach," Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 103, No.3, 1988, pp.411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  10. Bowersox, D.J. and P.J. Daugherty, "Logistics Paradigms : The Impact of Information Technology", Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1995, pp.65-80.
  11. Bowersox, D.J. and Closs, D.J., Logistics Management : The Integrated Supply Chain Process, McGraw-Hill Companies, 1996.
  12. Bowersox, D.J., Theodore, P.S., and Ptricia J.D., "Lean Launch: Managing Product Introduction Risk Through Response-Based Logistics," Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 16, No. 6, 1999, pp.557-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-6782(99)00016-8
  13. Falk, R.F. and Miller, N.B., A Primer for Soft Modeling, University of Akron Press, Akron Ohio, 1992.
  14. Hung R.Y.,"Business Process Management as Competitive Advantage: A Review and Empirical Study," Total Quality Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2006, pp.21-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360500249836
  15. Johnson, H.T. and Kaplan, R.S., Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. 1987.
  16. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P., "The Balanced Scorecard Measures That Drive Performance," Harvard Business Review, January-February 1992, pp.71-79.
  17. Kim, J.W. and Kim, E.J. "An Empirical Study on the Impacts of Partnership between SCM Implementation Enterprises on Business Performance,"International Journal of Strategic Management, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2009, pp. 104-117.
  18. Lambert, D.M. and Terrance, L.P., "Supply Chain Metrics," The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2001, pp.1-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090110806190
  19. Narasimhan, R. and Carter, J.R., "Linking Business Unit and Material Souring Strategies, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1998, pp.155-171.
  20. Narasimhan, R. and Kim, S.W., "Information System Utiliation Strategy for Supply Chain Integration," Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2001, pp.51-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00003.x
  21. Narver, J.C. and Stanley, F.S., "The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, No. 4, 1990, pp.20-35. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251757
  22. Nunnally, J.C., Psychometric Theory, 2nd Ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.
  23. Soejarto, A., "Setting the Stage for Real-Time Enterprise Transformation," Gartner Group, 2003.
  24. Stevens, G., "Integrating the Supply Chain,"International Journal of Physical Distribution and Materials Management, Vol. 19, No. 8, 1989, pp.3-8. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000000329
  25. Stevens, G.C., "Successful Supply Chain Management," Management Decision, Vol. 28, No. 8, 1990, pp.25-30.
  26. Straub, D., Limayem, W., and Karahana, E., "Measuring System Usage: Implications for IS Theory Testing,"Management Science, Vol. 41, No. 8, 1995, pp.1328-1342. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.8.1328
  27. Venkatraman, N. and Ramanujam, V., "Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Rsearch: A Comparison of Approach," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, No. 4, 1986, pp.801-814.
  28. Wisner, J.D. and Stanley, L.L., "Internal Relationships and Activities Associated with High Level of Purchasing Service Quality," The Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 35, No. 3, 1999, pp.25-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1999.tb00059.x