The effects of action observation and motor imagery of serial reaction time task(SRTT) in mirror neuron activation

연속 반응 시간 과제 수행의 행위 관찰과 운동 상상이 거울신경활성에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Sang-Yeol (Department of Physical Therapy, Gimhae college university) ;
  • Lee, Myung-Hee (Department of Physical Therapy, Daegu Health College) ;
  • Bae, Sung-Soo (Department of Physical Therapy, Daegu University) ;
  • Lee, Kang-Seong (Department of prosthetics and orthotics, Hanseo University) ;
  • Gong, Won-Tae (Department of Physical Therapy, Gumi college university)
  • 이상열 (김해대학 물리치료과) ;
  • 이명희 (대구보건대학 물리치료과) ;
  • 배성수 (대구대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 이강성 (한서대학교 의료보장구학과) ;
  • 공원태 (구미1대학 물리치료과)
  • Received : 2010.06.08
  • Accepted : 2010.07.27
  • Published : 2010.08.31

Abstract

Purpose : The object of this study was to examine the effect of motor learning on brain activation depending on the method of motor learning. Methods : The brain activation was measured in 9 men by fMRI. The subjects were divided into the following groups depending on the method of motor learning: actually practice (AP, n=3) group, action observation (AO, n=3) group and motor imagery (MI, n=3) group. In order to examine the effect of motor learning depending on the method of motor learning, the brain activation data were measured during learning. For the investigation of brain activation, fMRI was conducted. Results : The results of brain activation measured before and during learning were as follows; (1) During learning, the AP group showed the activation in the following areas: primary motor area located in precentral gyrus, somatosensory area located in postcentral gyrus, supplemental motor area and prefrontal association area located in precentral gyrus, middle frontal gyrus and superior frontal gyrus, speech area located in superior temporal gyrus and middle temporal gyrus, Broca's area located in inferior parietal lobe and somatosensory association area of precuneus; (2) During learning, the AD groups showed the activation in the following areas: primary motor area located in precentral gyrus, prefrontal association area located in middle frontal gyrus and superior frontal gyrus, speech area and supplemental motor area located in superior temporal gyrus and middle temporal gyrus, Broca's area located in inferior parietal lobe, somatosensory area and primary motor area located in precentral gyrus of right cerebrum and left cerebrum, and somatosensory association area located in precuneus; and (3) During learning, the MI group showed activation in the following areas: speech area located in superior temporal gyrus, supplemental area, and somatosensory association area located in precuneus. Conclusion : Given the results above, in this study, the action observation was suggested as an alternative to motor learning through actual practice in serial reaction time task of motor learning. It showed the similar results to the actual practice in brain activation which were obtained using activation of mirror neuron. This result suggests that the brain activation occurred by the activation of mirror neuron, which was observed during action observation. The mirror neurons are located in primary motor area, somatosensory area, premotor area, supplemental motor area and somatosensory association area. In sum, when we plan a training program through physiotherapy to increase the effect during reeducation of movement, the action observation as well as best resting is necessary in increasing the effect of motor learning with the patients who cannot be engaged in actual practice.

Keywords

References

  1. 김태호, 박상범, 하준호. 골프퍼팅과제에 대한 운동심상과 행위 관찰의 학습촉진효과 차이. 한국사회체육학회지. 2009;36:643-53.
  2. 박민철. 정신훈련이 편마비환자의 상지기능 향상에 미치는 영향. 부산가톨릭대학교 보건과학대학원 석사학위청구논문. 2006.
  3. 배성수 외 34명. 신경. 근육. 관절의 치료, 고유수용성신경근촉진법; 근거에 의한 진단과 중재. 서울. 도서출판 대학서림. 2009.
  4. 이명희. 신호 형태약 수면 의존성 학습이 운동수행 능력과 뇌 활성화에 미치는 영향. 대구대학교 대학원 박사학위 청구논문. 2009.
  5. Ashford D, Bennet S, Davids K. Observational modeling effects for movement dynamics and movement outcome measures across differing task constraints: A meta analysis. Journal of motor behavior. 2006;38:185-205. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.38.3.185-205
  6. Bandura A. Social learning through imitation. In MR Jones (Ed.). Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln. NE: University of Nebraska Press. 1962.
  7. Braun SM, Beurskens AJ, Borm PJ et al. The effects of mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2006;87(6):842-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.034
  8. Breslin G, Hodges NJ, Williams AM et al. Modelling relative motion to faciitate intra-limb coordination. Human Movement Science. 2005;24(3):446-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2005.06.009
  9. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR et al. Action observation activates premotor and parietal area in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2001;13(2):400-4.
  10. Gazzaniga MS, Ivry RB, Mangun GR. Cognitive Neuroscience(2). New York. W.W.Norton & Company. Ltd. 2002.
  11. Halsband U, Lange RK. Motor learning in man: a review of fimctional and clinical studied. Journal of physiology, Paris. 2006;99(4-6):414-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.007
  12. Hashimoto K, Higuchi K, Nakayama Y et al. Ability for basic movement as an early predictor of functioning related to activities of daily living in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007; 21(4):353-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968306297870
  13. Iacoboni M Neural mechanisms of imitation. Cerrent opinion in Neurobiology. 2005;15(6):632-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2005.10.010
  14. Molnar-Szakacs I, Kaplan J, Greenfield PM et al. Observing complex action sequences: The role of the fronto-parietal mirror neuron system. Neurolmage. 2006;33:923-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.07.035
  15. Cheng YW, Tzeng OJL, Hung D et al. Modulation of spinal excitability during observation of bipedal location. Neuroreport. 2005;16(15):1711-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000183325.13618.5f
  16. Mulder T, Hochstenbach JBH, van Heuvelen MJG et al. Motor imagery: The relation between age and imagery capacity. Human Movement Science. 2007;26(2):203-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2007.01.001
  17. Orban P, Peigneux P, Lungu O, Albouy G et al. The multifaceted nature of the relationship between performance and brain activity in motor sequence learning. Neuroimage. 2010;49(1):694-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.055
  18. Orrell AJ, Eves FF, Masters RS et al. Implicit sequence learning processes after unilateral stroke. Neuropsychologica. Rehabilitation. 2007;17(3):335-54.
  19. Page SJ, Levine P, Leonard AC. Effects of mental practice on affected limb use and function in chronic strock. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2005;86(3):399-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.10.002
  20. Papadelis C, Kourtidou-Papadeli C, Bamidis P et al. Effects of imagery training on cognitive performance and use of physiological measures as an assessment tool of mental effort. Brain and Cognition. 2007; 64(1):74-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2007.01.001
  21. Perry A, Bentin S. Mirror activity in the human brain while observing hand movement: A Comparison between EEG desynchronization in the $\mu$-range and previous fMRI results. Brain research. 2009; 1282: 126-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.059
  22. Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2001;2(9): 661-70. https://doi.org/10.1038/35090060
  23. Rizzolatti G. The mirror neuron system and its function in humans. Anat Embryol. 2005;210:419-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-005-0039-z
  24. Smith D, Holmes P. The effect of imagery modality on golf putting performance. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 2004;26:385-95.
  25. Stevens JA, Stoykov ME. Using motor imagery in the rehabilitation of hemiparesis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2003;84(7): 1090-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00042-X
  26. Tremblay C, Robert M, Pascual-Leone A et al. Action observation and execution: intracranial recordings in a hmnan subject. Neurology. 2004; 63:937-8. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000137111.16767.C6