Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science (한국산림과학회지)

Korean Society of Forest Science (한국산림과학회)
권호 표지

Effect of Different Irrigation Period on Photosynthesis and Growth Performances of Containerized Seedling of Eucalyptus pellita and Acacia mangium

관수 주기가 Eucalyptus pellita와 Acacia mangium 용기묘의 광합성 및 생장에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Soo-Won (Forest Practice Research Center, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Cho, Min-Seok (Forest Practice Research Center, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Gil-Nam (Department of Environment and Forest Resources, Chungnam National University)
  • 이수원 (국립산림과학원 산림생산기술연구소) ;
  • 조민석 (국립산림과학원 산림생산기술연구소) ;
  • 김길남 (충남대학교 산림자원학)
  • Received : 2010.03.31
  • Accepted : 2010.05.03
  • Published : 2010.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The objective of this study was to find optimal water condition of containerized seedling production of two tropical species for high seedling quality. This study was conducted to investigate photosynthesis, water use efficiency(WUE), Stomatal conductance(gs) and growth performances of containerized seedlings of Eucalyptus pellita and Acacia mangium growing under three different irrigation periods (1 time/1 day, 1 time/2 days and 1 time/3 days). E. pellita showed outstanding photosynthetic capacities at 1time/1day irrigation and A. mangium showed good photosynthetic capacity at all treatments. As irrigation period were shortened, gs of two species increased, while WUE of two species decreased. Root collar diameter and height of two species were the highest at 1 time/1 day irrigation, while the lowest at 1 time/3 days irrigation. As irrigation period were shortened, H/D ratio, biomass and seedling quality index (DQI) of two species increased but T/R ratio of two species showed the opposite tendency. These results showed that 1 time/1 day irrigation is optimal water condition of containerized seedling production of two tropical species and irrigation controlling is very important for growth and seedling quality of containerized seedling.

본 연구에서는 Eucalyptus pellita와 Acacia mangium 용기묘를 대상으로 관수 주기 처리를 통해 3가지 수준(1회/1일, 1회/2일, 1회/3일)으로 수분 조건을 달리하여 광합성, 수분이용효율, 기공전도도 및 생장 특성 변화를 조사 분석하였으며, 열대림 두 수종에 대한 용기 양묘 시 최적의 수분 환경을 구명 하고자 하였다. 그 결과, E. pellita는 1회/1일 관수 처리구에서 우수한 광합성 능력을 보였으며, A. mangium은 세 처리구 모두 좋은 광합성 능력을 나타냈다. 두 수종 모두 관수 주기가 짧을수록 기공전도도는 높아진 반면, 수분이용효율은 낮은 값을 보였다. 근원경과 간장 생장은 두 수종 모두 1회/1일 관수 처리구에서 높았으며 관수 주기가 짧을수록 높은 생장을 나타냈다. H/D율, 물질생산량 및 묘목품질지수(DQI)도 같은 경향을 보였으나, T/R율은 반대의 경향을 나타냈다. 1회/1일 관수 처리구는 건전하게 양묘된 묘목으로 평가할 수 있으며, 세 처리구 중 가장 우수한 묘목을 생산할 수 있는 수분 조건으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 국립산림과학원. 2005. 열대림 조성.관리에 관한 연구보고서 -인도네시아 KTH사 조림지를 중심으로-. 국립산림과학원. pp. 154.
  2. 권기원, 조민석, 김길남, 이수원, 장경환. 2009. 시비 처리에 따른 상수리나무(Quercus acutissima) 용기묘와 노지묘의 광합성 및 생장 특성. 한국임학회지 98(3): 331-338.
  3. 김판기, 이용섭, 정동준, 우수영, 성주한, 이은주. 2001. 광도가 내음성이 서로 다른 3수종의 광합성 생리에 미치는 영향. 한국임학회지 90(4): 476-487.
  4. 김판기, 이은주. 2001. 광합성의 생리상태(1) -광도와 엽육내 $CO_2$분압 변화에 대한 광합성 반응-. 한국농림기상학회지 3(2): 126-133.
  5. 농업기술연구소. 1988. 토양분석법: 토양, 식물체 토양미생물. 농청진흥청 농업기술연구소. pp. 450.
  6. 박종호, 권기원, 김세빈. 2007. 인도네시아에서의 산업조림과 A/R CDM 사업 경제성 분석. 한국임학회지 96(3):348-359.
  7. 배재수, 배기강. 2009. 개도국 산림전용으로 인한 온실가스 배출량 감축 및 산림탄소축적 증진 활동의 탄소배출권 잠재력 평가. 한국임학회지 98(3): 263-271.
  8. 산림청. 2001. 해외조림 투자환경 및 수익성 분석에 관한 연구. 산림청. pp. 345.
  9. 성주한, 제선미, 김선희, 김영걸. 2009. 염화칼슘 처리가 산딸나무 잎의 광합성 기구, 기공전도도 및 형광이미지 특성에 미치는 영향. 한국농림기상학회지 11(4): 143-150.
  10. 시그마 플롯. 2000. 필사이언스. pp. 136.
  11. 이수원, 최정호, 유세걸, 김석권, 배종향, 한석교. 2006. 상토 조성이 활엽수 용기묘의 생장특성에 미치는 영향. 한국생물환경조절학회 15(3): 244-249.
  12. 이철호, 신창호, 김규식, 최명석. 2006. 광강도에 따른 음나무 유묘의 생장 및 광합성 특성. 한국약용작물학회지 14(4): 244-249.
  13. 임종환, 우수영, 권미정, 천정화, 신준환. 2006. 한라산 구상나무 건전개체와 쇠약개체의 온도변화에 따른 광합성능력과 수분이용효율. 한국임학회지 95(6): 705-710.
  14. 제선미, 손석규, 우수영, 변광옥, 김찬수. 2006. 다른 광도에서 생육한 죽절초의 광합성 기구, 엽록소 함량차이. 한국농림기상학회지 8(2): 54-60.
  15. 조민석. 2008. 광도 변화가 온대중부 주요 활엽수종의 생리 및 생장에 미치는 영향. 충남대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 pp. 81.
  16. 최수임, 배재수, 정병헌. 2006. 기후변화협약 하에서 목제품 탄소계정 논의 동향 및 국내 탄소배출량에 미치는 영향 분석. 한국임학회지 95(4): 405-411.
  17. Ashraf, M., M. Arfan, M. Shahbaz, M. Ahmad, and A. Jamil. 2002. Gas exchange characteristics and water relations in some elite skra cultivars under water deficit. Photosynthetica 40(4): 615-620. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024368522742
  18. Atkin, O.K., Schortemeyer, M., McFarlane, N. and Evans, J.R. 1998. Variation in the components of relative growth rate in ten Acacia species from contrasting environments. Plant, Cell and Environment 21(10): 1007-1017. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1998.00356.x
  19. Barker, M.G., Press, M.C. and Brown, N.D. 1997. Photosynthetic characteristics of dipterocarp seedlings in three tropical rain forest light environments: a basis for niche partitioning. Oecologia 112(4): 453-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050332
  20. Bayala, J., Dianda, M., Wilson, J., Ouèdraogo, S.J. and Sanon, K. 2009. Predicting field performance of five irrigated tree species using seedling quality assessment in Burkina Faso, West Africa. New Forests 38(3): 309-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-009-9149-4
  21. Court-Picon, M., Gadbin-Henry, C., Guibal, F. and Roux, M. 2004. Dendrometry and morphology of Pinus pinea L. in lower province (France): adaptability and variability of provenances. Forest Ecology and Management 194: 319-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.024
  22. Davis, A.S. and Jacobs, D.F. 2005. Quantifying root system quality of nursery seedlings and relationship to outplanting performance. New Forests 30: 295-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-005-7480-y
  23. Deans, J.D., Mason, W.L., Cannell, M.G.R., Sharpe, A.L. and Sheppard, L.J. 1989. Growing regimes for bare-root stock of Sitka spruce, Douglas fir and Scots pine. 1. Morphology at the end of the nursery phase. Forestry 62: 53-60.
  24. Downes, G., Beadle, C. and Worledge, D. 1999. Daily stem growth patterns in irrigated Eucalyptus globulus and E-nitens in relation to climate. Trees 14(2): 102-111.
  25. FAO. 2006. Global forest resources assessment 2005. Rome. Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations.
  26. Gazal, R.M., C.A. Blanche, and W.M. Carandang. 2004. Root growth potential and seedling morphological attributes of narra (Pteracarpus indicus Willd.) transplants. Forest Ecology and Management 195: 259-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.03.023
  27. Grime, J.P. and Hunt, R. 1975. Relative growth-rate: its range and adaptive significance in a local flora. Journal of Ecology 63: 393-422. https://doi.org/10.2307/2258728
  28. Hernandez, J.A., Olmos, E., Corpas, F.J., Sevilla, F. and del Rio, L.A. 1995. Salt-induced oxidative stress in chloroplasts of pea plant. Plant Science 105(2): 151-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(94)04047-8
  29. Hughes, A.P. and P.R. Freeman. 1967. Growth analysis using frequent small harvests. Journal of Applied Ecology 4: 553-560. https://doi.org/10.2307/2401356
  30. Kozlowski, T.T., Kramer, P.J. and Pallardy, S.G. 1991. The Physiology of Woody Plants. A.P. New York. pp. 811.
  31. Katterer, T., A. Fabiaob, M. Madeirab, C. Ribeiroc, and E. Steena. 1995. Fine-root dynamics, soil moisture and soil carbon content in a Eucalyptus globulus plantation under different irrigation and fertilisation regimes. Forest Ecology and Management 74: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(95)03529-J
  32. Lambers, H. and Poorter, H. 1992. Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: a search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Advances in Ecological Research 23: 187-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60148-8
  33. Lee Y.K., Lee, D.K., Woo, S,Y., Park, P.S., Jang, Y.H. and Abraham, E.R.G. 2006. Effect of Acacia plantations on net photosynthesis, tree species composition, soil enzyme activities, and microclimate on Mt. Makiling. Photosynthetica 44(2): 299-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-006-0022-9
  34. Mattsson, A. 1996. Predicting field performance using seedling quality assessment. New Forests 13: 227-252.
  35. Muraoka, A., Tang, Y., Koizumi, H. and Washitani, I. 1997. Combined effects of light and water availability on photosynthesis and growth of Arisaema heterophyllum in the forest understory and an open site. Oecologia 112(1): 26-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050279
  36. SAS Institute Inc, 2000. SAS/STAT TM Guide for Personal Computer. Version 8 Edition. SAS Institute Inc., N. C. pp. 1026.
  37. Seiler, J.R. and Johson, J.D. 1988. Physiological and morphological responses of three half-sib families of loblolly pine to water-stress conditioning. Forest Science 34(2): 487-495.
  38. Semchenko, M., Hutchings, M.J. and John, E.A. 2007. Challenging the tragedy of the commons in root competition: confounding effects of neighbour presence and substrate volume. Journal of Ecology 95(2): 252-260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01210.x
  39. Suitor, S., Potts, B.M., Brown, P.H., Gracie, A.J., Rix, K.D. and Gore, P.L. 2010. The impact of flower density and irrigation on capsule and seed set in Eucalyptus globulus seed orchards. New Forests 39(1): 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-009-9159-2
  40. Sestak, Z., Catsk, J. and Jarvis, P.G. 1971. Plant Photosynthetic Production Manual of Methods. The Hague. Hertogenbosch. pp. 818.
  41. Takemura, T., Hanagata, N., Sugihara, K., Baba, S., Karube, I. and Dubinsky, Z. 2000. Physiological and biochemical responses to salt stress in the mangrove, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza. Aquatic Botany 68(1): 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(00)00106-6
  42. Walters, G.A. and Bartholomew, D.P. 1990. Adaptation of Acacia koa leaves and phyllodes to changes in photosynthetic photon flux density. Forest Science 36(4): 1050-1060.
  43. Warren, C.R. and Adams, M.A. 2005. What determines interspecific variation in relative growth rate of Eucalyptus seedlings?. Oecologia 114(3): 373-381.
  44. Wright, I.J., Reich, P.B. and Westoby, M. 2001. Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high- and low-rainfall and high- and low-nutrient habitats. Functional Ecology 15(4): 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00542.x
  45. Xu, S.M., Liu, L.X., Woo, K.C. and Wang, D.L. 2007. Changes in photosynthesis, xanthophyll cycle, and sugar accumulation in two North Australia tropical species differing in leaf angles. Photosynthetica 45(3): 348-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-007-0059-4