DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of genetic diversity and relationships among waxy maize inbred lines in Korea using SSR markers

  • Sa, Kyu-Jin (Department of Applied Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Park, Jong-Yeol (Maize Experiment Station, Gangwondo Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Park, Ki-Jin (Maize Experiment Station, Gangwondo Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Lee, Ju-Kyong (Department of Applied Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2010.03.07
  • Accepted : 2010.05.20
  • Published : 2010.08.30

Abstract

Information regarding the genetic diversity and genetic relationships among elite inbred lines is necessary to improve new cultivars in maize breeding programs. In this study, genetic diversity and genetic relationships were investigated among 84 waxy maize inbred lines using 50 SSR markers. A total of 269 alleles were identified at all the loci with an average of 5.38 and a range between 2 and 13 alleles per locus. The gene diversity values varied from 0.383 to 0.923 with an average of 0.641. The cluster tree generated using the described SSR markers recognized two major groups at 32% genetic similarity. Group I included 33 inbred lines while group II included 51 inbred lines. The clustering patterns of most of the waxy maize inbred lines did not clearly agree with their source, pedigree or geographic location. The average GS among all inbred lines was 35.7 ${\pm}$ 10.8. Analysis of waxy maize inbred lines collected from Korea and China at 50 SSR loci revealed higher values of average number of alleles (4.9) and gene diversity (0.638) in Korean inbred lines as compared to Chinese inbred lines (3.5 and 0.563, respectively). The information obtained from the present studies would be very useful for maize breeding programs in Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. Akagi H, Yokozaki Y, Inagaki A and Fujimura T (1997) Highly polymorphic microsatellites of rice consist of AT repeats, and a classification of closely related cultivars with these microsatellite loci. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94: 61-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050382
  2. Ajmone-Marsan, Castiglioni P, Fusari F, Kuiper M and Motto M (1998) Genetic diversity and its relationship to hybrid performance in maize as revealed by RFLP and AFLP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96: 219-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050730
  3. Anderson JA, Churchill GA, Autrique JE, Tanksley SD and Sorrells ME (1993) Optimizing parental selection for genetic linkage maps. Genome 36: 181-186. https://doi.org/10.1139/g93-024
  4. Dellaporta SL, Wood J and Hicks JB (1983) A simple and rapid method for plant DNA preparation. Version II. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1: 19-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02712670
  5. Dice LR (1945) Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26: 297-302. https://doi.org/10.2307/1932409
  6. Enoki H, Sato H and Koinuma K (2002) SSR analysis of genetic diversity among maize inbred lines adapted to cold regions of Japan. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104: 1270-1277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-001-0857-1
  7. Fedoroff N, Wessler S and Shure M (1983) Isolation of the transposable maize controlling elements Ac and Ds. Cell 35: 235-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(83)90226-X
  8. Gethi JG, Labate JA, Lamkey KR, Smith ME and Kresoovich S (2002) SSR variation in important U.S. maize inbred lines. Crop Sci. 42: 951-957. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.0951
  9. Hallauer AR, Russell WA and Lamkey KR (1988) Corn breeding. pp 463-564. In G.F. Sprague and JW Dudley (ed). Corn and Corn Improvement. 3rd ed. Agron., Monogr. 18. Madison, WI, USA.
  10. Huang XQ, Borner A, Roder MS and Ganal MW (2002) Assessing genetic diversity of wheat (Triticum asetivum L.) germplasm using microsatellite markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105: 699-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-002-0959-4
  11. Klosgen RB, Gierl A, Schwarz-Sommer Z, Saedler H (1986) Molecular analysis of the waxy locus of Zea mays. Mol. Gen. Genet. 203: 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333960
  12. Lanza LLB, de Souza Jr CL, Ottoboni LMM, Vieira MLC and de Souza AP (1997) Genetic distance of inbred lines and prediction of maize single-cross performance using RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94: 1023-1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050510
  13. Le Clerc V, Bazante F, Baril C, Guiard J and Zhang D (2005) Assessing temporal changes in genetic diversity of maize varieties using microsatellite markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 110: 294-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1834-2
  14. Lu H and Bernardo R (2001) Molecular marker diversity among current and historical maize inbreds. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103: 613-617. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00002917
  15. Melchinger AE, Lee M, Lamkey KR, Hallauer AR and Woodman WL (1990) Genetic diversity for restriction fragment length polymorphism and heterosis for two diallel sets of maize inbreds. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80: 488-496.
  16. Melchinger AE, Boppenmmaier J, Dhillon BS, Pollmer WG and Herrmann RG (1992) Genetic diversity for RFLPs in European maize inbreds: II. Relation to performance of hybrids within versus between heterotic groups for forage traits. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84: 672-681.
  17. Messmer MM, Melchinger AE, Herrmann RG and Boppenmaier J (1993) Relationships among early European maize inbreds. II. Comparison of pedigree and RFLP data. Crop Sci. 33: 944-950. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183X003300050014x
  18. Moeller DA and Schaal BA (1999) Genetic relationships among Native American maize accessions of the great plains assessed by RAPDs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 1061-1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051415
  19. Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 70: 3321-3323. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321
  20. Nelson OE and Rines HW (1962) The enzymatic deficiency in the waxy mutant of maize. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 9: 297-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-291X(62)90043-8
  21. Park JS, Park JY, Park KJ, Lee JK (2008) Genetic Diversity Among Waxy Corn Accessions in Korea Revealed by Microsatellite Markers. Korean J. Breed. Sci. 40: 250-257.
  22. Pejic I, Ajmone-Marsan P, Morgante M, Kozumplick V, Castiglioni P, Taramino G, Motto M (1998) Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs, RAPDs, SSR, and AFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97: 1248-1255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051017
  23. Powell W, Morgante M, Andre C, Hanafey M, Vogel J, Tingey S and Rafalski A (1996) The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Mol. Breed. 2: 225-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00564200
  24. Prasad M, Varshney RK, Roy JK, Balyan HS and Gupta PK (2000) The use of microsatellites for detecting DNA polymorphism, genotype identification and genetic diversity in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100: 584-592.
  25. Rafalski JA, Vogel JM, Morgante M, Powell W, Andre C and Tingey SV (1996) Generating and using DNA markers in plants. In: Birren B, Lai E (eds), Non-mammalian genomic analysis. A practical guide. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 75-134.
  26. Reif JC, Warburton ML, Xia XC, Hoisington DA, Crossa J, Taba S, Muminovic J, Bohn M, Frisch M and Melchinger AE (2006) Groping of accessions of Mexican races of maize revisited with SSR markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 113: 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-006-0283-5
  27. Rohlf FJ (2000) NTSYS- pc: Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version: 2.1. Exeter Software, New York.
  28. Senior ML, Murphy JP, Goodman MM and Stuber C (1998) Utility of SSRs for determining genetic similarities and relationships in maize using an agarose gel system. Crop Sci. 38: 1088-1098. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800040034x
  29. Smith JSC, Chin ECL, Shu H, Smith OS, Wall SJ, Senior ML, Mitchell SE, Kresovich S and Ziegler J (1997) An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular marker in maize (Zea mays L.): comparison with RFLPs and pedigree. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050544
  30. Sprague GF, Brimhall B and Hixon RM (1943) Some effects of the waxy gene in corn on properties of the endosperm starch. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 35: 817-822. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1943.00021962003500090008x
  31. Taramino G and Tingey S (1996) Simple sequence repeats for germplasm analysis and mapping in maize. Genome 39: 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1139/g96-038
  32. Warburton ML, Xianchun X, Crossa J, Franco J, Melchinger AE, Frisch M, Bohn M and Hoisington D (2002) Genetic characterization of CIMMYT inbred maize lines and open pollinated populations using large scale fingerprinting methods. Crop Sci. 42: 1832-1840. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.1832
  33. Xia XC, Reif JC, Melchinger AE, Frisch M, Hoisington DA, Beck K, Pixley K and Warburton ML (2005) Genetic diversity among CIMMYT maize inbred lines investigated with SSR markers: II. Subtropical, tropical midaltitude, and highland maize inbred lines and their relationships with elite U.S. and European maize. Crop Sci. 45: 2573-2582. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.0246
  34. Xie C, Warburton M, Li M, Li X, Xiao M, Hao Z and Zhang S (2008) An analysis of population structure and linkage disequilibrium using multilocus data in 187 maize inbred lines. Mol. Breeding 21: 407-418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-007-9140-8
  35. Zhao W, Chung JW, Ma KH, Kim TS, Kim SM, Shin DI, Kim CH, Koo HM, Park YJ (2009) Analysis of Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Rice Cultivars from Korea, China and Japan using SSR Markers. GENES & GENOMICS 31: 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03191201

Cited by

  1. QTL analysis for eating quality-related traits in an F 2:3 population derived from waxy corn × sweet corn cross vol.63, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.63.325
  2. Genetic Variation of Common Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) Collected from East Asia Based on Simple Sequence Repeats (SSRs) vol.8, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.9787/pbb.2020.8.2.186