DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pilot research on species composition of Korean purse seine catch at cannery

가공공장에서 수행한 한국 다랑어 선망 어획물 종조성에 대한 예비 연구

  • Lee, Sung-Il (Fisheries Resources Management Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI)) ;
  • Kim, Zang-Geun (Fisheries Resources Management Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI)) ;
  • Sohn, Haw-Sun (Cetacean Research Institute, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI)) ;
  • Yoo, Joon-Taek (Fisheries Resources Management Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI)) ;
  • Kim, Mi-Jung (Biotechnology Research Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI)) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Woo (Fisheries Resources Management Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI)) ;
  • Kim, Doo-Nam (Fisheries Resources Management Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI)) ;
  • Moon, Dae-Yeon (Fisheries Resources Management Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI))
  • 이성일 (국립수산과학원 자원관리과) ;
  • 김장근 (국립수산과학원 자원관리과) ;
  • 손호선 (국립수산과학원 고래연구소) ;
  • 유준택 (국립수산과학원 자원관리과) ;
  • 김미정 (국립수산과학원 생명공학과) ;
  • 이동우 (국립수산과학원 자원관리과) ;
  • 김두남 (국립수산과학원 자원관리과) ;
  • 문대연 (국립수산과학원 자원관리과)
  • Received : 2011.09.29
  • Accepted : 2011.10.21
  • Published : 2011.11.30

Abstract

A preliminary study on species composition of a Korean purse seine catch landed at cannery was conducted in April 2011. In the cannery, all tuna catch are sliding through a sorting grid panel that filters and drops fish in the buckets by size class (above 9kg, 3.4-9kg, 1.8-3.4kg, 1.4-1.8kg and below 1.4kg). In cannery processing, species sorting was made for skipjack tuna and yellowfin tuna only from catches greater than 3.4kg during filtering but not for bigeye tuna because of difficulties in species identification between bigeye tuna and yellowfin tuna under frozen state. As no species identification was carried out for catch groups less than 3.4kg in the cannery process, this study focused on sorting out skipjack tuna and yellowfin tuna from these groups and then identifying bigeye tuna from all size groups of yellowfin tuna. Using the mixture rate of species obtained from the samples taken, species composition of the landed catch was estimated. As results, cannery research showed 95% for skipjack tuna, 3% for yellowfin tuna and 2% for bigeye tuna in species composition, while vessel logbook data represented 96%, 3% and 1% for skipjack tuna, yellowfin tuna and bigeye tuna, respectively. The proportion of bigeye tuna identified in the cannery was slightly higher than shown in logbook data by 1%.

Keywords

References

  1. Fonteneau, A., 1975. Note sur les problemes d' identification du bigeye dans les statistiques de peche. Rec. Doc Scient ICCAT, Vol IV pp. 8.
  2. Fonteneau, A., 2008. Species composition of tuna catches taken by purse seiners. WCPFC-SC4-2008/STWP- 2, pp. 13.
  3. Itano, D.G., 2005. A handbook for the identification of yellowfin and bigeye tunas in Brine Frozen Condition v5. 1-32.
  4. Kwon, Y., D.H. An, J.B. Lee, C.I. Zhang and D.Y. Moon, 2008. Standardization of CPUE for bigeye (Thunnus obesus) and yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) tunas by the Korean longline fishery in the Indian Ocean. J. Kor. Soc. Fish. Tech., 44 (3), 194-206. https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2008.44.3.194
  5. Kwon, Y., D.H. An, D.Y. Moon, S.J. Hwang and J.B. Lee, 2009. An ecological risk assessment for the effect of the Korean tuna longline fishery in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean. J. Kor. Soc. Fish. Tech., 45 (1), 22-33. https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2008.45.1.022
  6. Lennert-Cody, C.E., M.N. Maunder, P.K. Tomlinson, A. Aires-de-Silva, A. Perez and M. McCracken, 2011. Poststratified estimators of total catch for the purseseine fishery port-sampling data. IATTC SAC-02 -10, pp. 8.
  7. Moon, D.Y., W.S. Yang, S.S. Kim, J.R. Koh and E.J. Kim, 2005. Characteristics of the Korean tuna purse seine fishery in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean. J. Kor. Soc. Fish. Tech., 41 (4), 263-270. https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2005.41.4.263
  8. National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI), 2007. Development of distant-water fishing ground 50 years. Haein Press, Busan, pp. 15 -16.
  9. Satoh, K., H. Okamoto, T. Fukuda, N. Kenji, Y. Sasaki and T. Oshima, 2010. Accuracy of species identification of yellowfin and bigeye in three canneries Kingdon of Thailand. WCPFC-SC6- 2010/ST-WP-04, pp. 15.
  10. Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC), 2008. Conservation and management measure for bigeye and yellowfin tuna in the western an central Pacific ocean. CMM 2008-01, pp. 42.
  11. Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC), 2009. Conservation and management measure to monitor landings of purse seine vessels at ports so as to ensure reliable catch data by species. CMM 2009-10, pp. 2.
  12. Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC), 2011. Scientific Committee Seventh Regular Session summary report. pp. 165.

Cited by

  1. Age and Growth of the Skipjack Tuna Katsuwonus pelamis in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean vol.48, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2015.0377
  2. The fishing characteristics of Korean tuna purse seine fishery in the Pacific Ocean vol.51, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2015.51.3.414
  3. Changes in fishing characteristics and distributions of Korean tuna purse seine fishery by oceanographic conditions in the Pacific Ocean vol.52, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2016.52.2.149
  4. Occurrence of skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) larvae in Korean waters vol.51, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2015.51.1.079
  5. Catch characteristics of the Korean tuna longline fishery in the Atlantic ocean vol.50, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2014.50.4.556