Liver Fluke Prevention and Control in the Northeast of Thailand Through Action Research

Wongba, N;Thaewnongiew, K;Phathee, K;Laithavewat, L;Duangsong, R;Promthet, S;Tangsawad, S

  • Published : 20110500

Abstract

The aim of this action research was to enhance people's potential to prevent and control liver fluke infestation. The subjects were a total of 96 participants comprising 20 community leaders, 74 individuals handling and preparing food, and 2 officials from the Local Administration. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaire and the results of stool examination of the participants were recorded. The main methods used to collect qualitative data were focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. For qualitative data analysis, the researchers undertook a qualitative content analysis. For quantitative data, conventional descriptive statistics were used and the mean differences with the 95% CI before and after the study were compared. The results in the early stage found that the participants were not aware of the fact that eating raw fish might be the cause of developing cholangiocarcinoma. 94.8% of participants however knew that eating raw fish might be cause having liver fluke infection which can be treated be taking an antihelminthic drug. They perceived that it is way of life since their ancestors already consumed raw fish because they found it to be delicious. However, through participating in this study, it was realized how dangerous it is to get infected with the liver fluke. Participants also learned the life cycle of liver fluke. They talked about this within their families, and communicated as well as cooperated with others to strengthen a network of a club concentrating on not eating raw fish. The communities and the Sub-district Administrative Organization supported the project. In conclusion, it is advisable to improve the behavior of participants in villages so that they became aware how to prevent and control liver fluke infection and therefore the development of cholangiocarcinoma.

Keywords

References

  1. Chokewanichpong V, Sarakhan A, Sangrajrang S (2009). Study of behaviors and attitudes related to eating raw freshwater fish and cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer J, 162 , 162-175.
  2. Elo S, Kyngas H (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. J. Adv. Nurs, 62, 107-115 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
  3. Honjo S, Srivatanakul P, Sriplung H, et al (2005). Genetic and environmental determinants of risk for cholangiocarcinoma via O. viverrini in a densely infested area in Nakhon Phanom, northeast Thailand. Int. J Cancer, 14, 854 - 860.
  4. Guba G, Lincoln S (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
  5. Kato K, Miura M (1954). Comparative examination. Jpn J parasitol , 3:35.
  6. Mairiang E, Haswell-Elkins MR, Mairiang P, et al (1993). Reversal of biliary tract abnormalities associated with O.viverrini infection following praziquantel treatment. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg, 87, 194-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0035-9203(93)90489-D
  7. National Cancer Institute (2008). Situation of cholangiocarcinoma and liver cancer patients Thailand . Available at http://www.nci.go.th/File_download/nci%20Cancer/2008.pdf
  8. Ohshima H, Bandaletova TY, Brouet I, et al (1994). Increased nitrosamine and nitrate biosynthesis mediated by nitric oxide synthase induced in hamsters infected with liver fluke (O. viverrini). Carcinogenesis, 4, 271-275.
  9. Office of Disease Prevention and Control 6 Khon Kaen (2009). The survey result of prevalence of parasite disease in Northeast, Thailand. (Non-Publish).
  10. Yeoh K, Sriamporn S, Sithithaworn p, et al. (2009). Liver fluke in fection and liver cancer in Thailand. Abstract. Annals of Oncology, 20, 93.
  11. Parkin M, Ohshima H, Srivatanakul P, et al (1993). Cholangiocarcinoma: Epidemiology, Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis and Prevention. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2, 537-544,
  12. Wongratancheewin S, Sermswan RW, Sirisinha S (2003). Immunology and molecular biology of O. viverrini infection. Acta Trop, 88, 195-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2003.02.002