DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Modern-day medical professionalism: historical background, evolution of the concepts, and a critique on the statements

현대 의학전문직업성: 역사적 배경, 개념변화, 선언문 비판

  • Choi, Bomoon (Division of Humanities & Social Sciences of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
  • 최보문 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학/의학전문대학원 인문사회의학과)
  • Published : 2011.11.10

Abstract

Modern day medical professionalism has been advocated by multiple professional organizations and individual scholars. Most of the statements publicly issued emphasize particular moral traditions and the highest professional standards along with doctors' social role to recover society's trust, which have proved ineffective in bringing any change. Based on the perspective that medical professionalism is a norm of practice, acknowledged and shared by the majority of current ordinary doctors, the author traced the emergence of modern professionalism to challenge the legitimacy of those virtue-based arguments within a historical context. With the increasing complexities of both society and the health care system, new types of health clinics have been practiced especially by young generation doctors. As these are explored, several factors related with those stated professionalism that are creating conflicts are discussed. It is criticized that those statements demand individual doctors to adhere to the ideal professionalism regardless of any circumstances, so that it excludes any discussion about professionalism from the broader social contextual background. Given that professionalism is a context-dependent concept, it is stressed that modern day medical professionalism is required to evolve along with societal change. As medicine is recognized as a system in which numerous societal areas are involved, medical professionalism is expected to be rewritten into a consensus-based, more realistic and explicit compact.

Keywords

References

  1. Sigerist H. Civilization and disease. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1915.
  2. Abraham F. Medical education in the United States and Canada: a report to the Carnegie Foundation for the advancement of teaching. Kim S, translator. Paju: Hangilsa; 2005.
  3. Edelstein L. The Hippocratic oath, text, translation and interpretation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press; 1943.
  4. Jonsen AR. A short history of medical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.
  5. Wynia MK. The short history and tenuous future of medical professionalism: the erosion of medicine's social contract. Perspect Biol Med 2008;51:565-578. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.0.0051
  6. Baker R, Caplan A, Emanuel L, Latham S. The American medical ethics revolution: how the AMA's code of ethics has transformed physicians' relationships to patients, profe-ssionals, and society. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1999.
  7. Paul S. The social transformation of American medicine. Lee JC, translator. Seoul: Myeonggyeong; 1996.
  8. Fox RC. The sociology of medicine: a participant observer's view. Cho HI, translator. Seoul: Nanam; 1989.
  9. Evetts J. The sociological analysis of professionalism: occupational change in the modern world. Int Sociol 2003;18:395-415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580903018002005
  10. Relman AS. The new medical-industrial complex. N Engl J Med 1980;303:963-970. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198010233031703
  11. Kassirer JP. On the take: how medicine's complicity with big business can endanger your health. Choi BM, translator. Seoul: Yangmun; 2008.
  12. Lundberg GD. Medicine: a profession in trouble? JAMA 1985; 253:2879-2880. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1985.03350430091036
  13. Hafferty FW, Levinson D. Moving beyond nostalgia and motives: towards a complexity science view of medical professionalism. Perspect Biol Med 2008;51:599-615. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.0.0044
  14. Swick HM. Toward a normative definition of medical professionalism. Acad Med 2000;75:612-616. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200006000-00010
  15. ABIM Foundation; American Board of Internal Medicine; ACP-ASIM Foundation; American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine; European Federation of Internal Medicine. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:243-246. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-136-3-200202050-00012
  16. ACS Task Force on Professionalism. Code of professional conduct. J Am Coll Surg 2003;197:603-604.
  17. American Academy of Pediatrics; Committee on Bioethics; Fallat ME, Glover J. Professionalism in pediatrics: statement of principles. Pediatrics 2007;120:895-897. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-2229
  18. Kearney RA. Defining professionalism in anaesthesiology. Med Educ 2005;39:769-776. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02233.x
  19. Rowley BD, Baldwin DC Jr, Bay RC, Karpman RR. Professionalism and professional values in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000;(378):90-96.
  20. Woodruff JN, Angelos P, Valaitis S. Medical professionalism: one size fits all? Perspect Biol Med 2008;51:525-534. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.0.0056
  21. Chung CW. Current situation of medical professionalism education in Korean medical schools. Korean J Med Educ 2004;16:259-267. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2004.16.3.259
  22. Shah N, Anderson J, Humphrey HJ. Teaching professionalism: a tale of three schools. Perspect Biol Med 2008;51:535-546. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.0.0041
  23. Hilton S. Education and the changing face of medical professionalism: from priest to mountain guide? Br J Gen Pract 2008;58:353-361. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp08X280128
  24. Cohen JJ. Professionalism in medical education, an American perspective: from evidence to accountability. Med Educ 2006; 40:607-617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02512.x
  25. Brennan TA, Rothman DJ, Blank L, Blumenthal D, Chimonas SC, Cohen JJ, Goldman J, Kassirer JP, Kimball H, Naughton J, Smelser N. Health industry practices that create conflicts of interest: a policy proposal for academic medical centers. JAMA 2006;295:429-433. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.4.429
  26. Campbell EG, Weissman JS, Ehringhaus S, Rao SR, Moy B, Feibelmann S, Goold SD. Institutional academic industry relationships. JAMA 2007;298:1779-1786. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.15.1779
  27. Rothman DJ. Academic medical centers and financial conflicts of interest. JAMA 2008;299:695-697. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.6.695
  28. Rothman DJ, McDonald WJ, Berkowitz CD, Chimonas SC, DeAngelis CD, Hale RW, Nissen SE, Osborn JE, Scully JH Jr, Thomson GE, Wofsy D. Professional medical associations and their relationships with industry: a proposal for controlling conflict of interest. JAMA 2009;301:1367-1372. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.407
  29. Cohen JJ, Cruess S, Davidson C. Alliance between society and medicine: the public's stake in medical professionalism. JAMA 2007;298:670-673. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.6.670
  30. Lawson WD. Professionalism: the golden years. J Prof Issues Eng Pract 2004;130:26-36. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2004)130:1(26)
  31. Hafferty FW, Castellani B. The increasing complexities of professionalism. Acad Med 2010;85:288-301. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c85b43
  32. Brainard AH, Brislen HC. Viewpoint: learning professionalism. A view from the trenches. Acad Med 2007;82:1010-1014. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ACM.0000285343.95826.94
  33. Daniel M. Human, transhuman, posthuman: implications of evolution-by-design for human security. J Hum Secur 2008; 4:4-20.
  34. Sullivan P. Putting your doctor, or a whole team of them, on retainer. The New York Times. 2011 April 29; business section.
  35. Bishop JP, Rees CE. Hero or has-been: is there a future for altruism in medical education? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2007;12:391-399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9064-4
  36. Karatani K. Ethics 21. Song TW, translator. Seoul: Sahoe-pyeongnon; 2001.
  37. Glannon W, Ross LF. Are doctors altruistic? J Med Ethics 2002;28:68-69. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.28.2.68
  38. General Medical Council. The new doctors: guidance on foundation training [Internet]. London: General Medical Council; 2009 [cited 2011 Oct 14]. Available from: http://www.gmc-uk.org/New_Doctor09_FINAL.pdf_27493417.pdf_39279971.pdf.
  39. Jonsen AR. The new medicine and the old ethics. Lee IH, Kim YJ, translators. Suwon: Munhwa Design; 2007.
  40. Shaw K, Cassel CK, Black C, Levinson W. Shared medical regulation in a time of increasing calls for accountability and transparency: comparison of recertification in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. JAMA 2009;302: 2008-2014. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1620
  41. Chantler C, Ashton R. The purpose and limits to professional self-regulation. JAMA 2009;302:2032-2033. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1644
  42. Ham C, Alberti KG. The medical profession, the public, and the government. BMJ 2002;324:838-842. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7341.838
  43. Hafferty F. Viewpoint: the elephant in medical professionalism's kitchen. Acad Med 2006;81:906-914. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ACM.0000238230.80419.cf
  44. Kinghorn WA, McEvoy MD, Michel A, Balboni M. Professionalism in modern medicine: does the emperor have any clothes? Acad Med 2007;82:40-45. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ACM.0000249911.79915.4d
  45. World Health Organization. Definition of health [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000 [cited 2011 Oct 14]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/aboutwho/en/definition.html.
  46. Freidson E. Professionalism, the third logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2001.

Cited by

  1. 대한소아청소년정신의학회 의료윤리규정: 왜 필요한가? vol.27, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5765/jkacap.2016.27.1.2
  2. Development of the codes and guidelines of medical ethics in Korea vol.60, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2017.60.1.8
  3. 북미 의학교육 사례가 한의학 교육에 주는 시사점 vol.31, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.15521/jkmh.2018.31.2.091