DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Problems and their solutions of the proposed health management service act

건강관리서비스 법안의 문제점과 해결방안

  • Lee, Joongyub (Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Byung-Joo (Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • 이중엽 (서울대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 박병주 (서울대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실)
  • Published : 2011.01.10

Abstract

To deal with the burden of chronic illnesses, the Korean government has planned to adopt the Health Management Service Act (HMS) to reduce risk factors related to lifestyle, including diet and physical activity with reinforcement of dietitians and physical education instructors and other health professionals. We welcome the strategy to expand human resources for preventing cardio-cerebrovascular events (CVE); however, the delivery system of the HMS has stimulated heated debate. The current legislative bill lacks a comprehensive perspective of clinical preventive medicine. It states that HMS is not a medical service, and therefore the HMS facilities are not medical institutions and can be operated independently from medical professionals. By excluding medical specialists who could integrate information from patients in order to prevent CVEs, the bill is incompatible with the main purpose of HMS and will fail to achieve its goal. To suggest a solution to the debate, a patient-centered, evidence-based approach should be established in order to make an arena where all disciplines related to chronic disease prevention can contribute to the HMS. The participation of medical doctors who are fundamental to healthcare is essential for the successful establishment of an HMS delivery system in Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. Korea Health Industry Development Institute. The study of developmental strategy for the health management service market. Seoul: Korea Health Industry Development Institute; 2009.
  2. Korea Health Industry Development Institute. Estimation for the market size of health management service and U-healthcare. Seoul: Korea Health Industry Development Institute; 2009.
  3. Korea Health Industry Development Institute. Symposium: successful implementation of health management service. Seoul: Korea Health Industry Development Institute; 2010.
  4. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Behavioral counseling in primary care to promote physical activity: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:205-207. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-137-3-200208060-00014
  5. Sorensen JB, Skovgaard T, Puggaard L. Exercise on prescription in general practice: a systematic review. Scand J Prim Health Care 2006;24:69-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813430600700027
  6. Ehrsam R, Hoerler-Koerner U, Stoffel S, Melges T, Ainsworth B. Exercise prescription for the overweight and the obese: how to quantify and yet keep it simple. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43:951-953. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2008.055657
  7. Pinet BM, Prud'homme D, Gallant CA, Boulay P. Exercise intensity prescription in obese individuals. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008;16:2088-2095. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2008.272
  8. Matzen RN, Lang RS. Clinical preventive medicine. St. Louis: Mosby;1993. 1263 p.

Cited by

  1. 통합건강관리간호사 역할규명을 위한 직무분석: 연 회원제 건강관리 서비스 중심 vol.22, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2016.22.2.129